Melodic contour identification training in cochlear implant users with and without a competing instrument

Seminars in Hearing

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 399-409

  Galvin, Johnj ^a   Eskridge, Elizabeth ^a   Oba, Sandy ^a   Fu, Qian Jie ^a  

^a Division of Communication and Auditory Neuroscience   (United States)

Author keywords

cochlear implant; music; training

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOIMMUNE INNER EAR DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; INNER EAR DISEASE; INSTRUMENT; MALE; MELODIC CONTOUR IDENTIFICATION TRAINING; MUSIC; PERCEPTION; PITCH; TRAINING;

EID: 84869125563     PISSN: 07340451     EISSN: 10988955     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329227     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Gfeller K., Witt S., Woodworth G., Mehr M. A., Knutson J. Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol: 2002; 111 349 356
2. Looi V., McDermott H., McKay C., Hickson L. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users. Ear Hear: 2008; 29 421 434
3. McDermott H. J. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif: 2004; 8 49 82
4. Bregman A. S. Auditory Scene Analysis, the Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge, MA The MIT Press: 1999; 125 130
5. Zhu M., Chen B., Galvin J. J. III, Fu Q. J. Influence of pitch, timbre and timing cues on melodic contour identification with a competing masker (L). J Acoust Soc Am: 2011; 130 3562 3565
6. Galvin J. J. III, Fu Q. J., Nogaki G. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear: 2007; 28 302 319
7. Galvin J. J. III, Fu Q. J., Oba S. I. Effect of a competing instrument on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am: 2009; 125 EL98 EL103
8. Looi V., She J. Music perception of cochlear implant users: a questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program. Int J Audiol: 2010; 49 116 128
9. Galvin J. J. III, Fu Q. J., Shannon R. V. Melodic contour identification and music perception by cochlear implant users. Ann N Y Acad Sci: 2009; 1169 518 533
10. Gfeller K., Witt S., Adamek M., et al. Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol: 2002; 13 132 145
11. Moore D. R., Amitay S., Hawkey D. J. Auditory perceptual learning. Learn Mem: 2003; 10 83 85
12. Amitay S., Hawkey D. J., Moore D. R. Auditory frequency discrimination learning is affected by stimulus variability. Percept Psychophys: 2005; 67 691 698
13. Amitay S., Irwin A., Moore D. R. Discrimination learning induced by training with identical stimuli. Nat Neurosci: 2006; 9 1446 1448
14. Moore D. R., Halliday L. F., Amitay S. Use of auditory learning to manage listening problems in children. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci: 2009; 364 409 420
15. Chan J. C., Freed D. J., Vermiglio A. J., Soli S. D. Evaluation of binaural functions in bilateral cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol: 2008; 47 296 310
16. Nilsson M., Soli S. D., Sullivan J. A. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am: 1994; 95 1085 1099
17. Galvin J. J. III, Fu Q. J., Oba S. Effect of instrument timbre on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am: 2008; 124 EL189 EL195
18. Fu Q. J., Galvin J. J. III. Computer-assisted speech training for cochlear implant patients: feasibility, outcomes, and future directions. Semin Hear: 2007; 28 141 149
19. Fu Q. J., Galvin J. J. III. Maximizing cochlear implant patients' performance with advanced speech training procedures. Hear Res: 2008; 242 198 208