Person (mis)perception: Functionally biased sex categorization of bodies

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 279, Issue 1749, 2012, Pages 4982-4989

  Johnson, Kerri L ^a   Iida, Masumi ^b   Tassinary, Louis G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Body perception; Person perception; Sex categorization; Sexual dimorphism; Waist to hip ratio

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; PERCEPTION; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM;

EID: 84869100865     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2060     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Brewer, M. B. 1988 A dual process model of impression formation. In Advances in social cognition, vol. 1 (eds R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull), pp. 1-36. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Rule, N. O., Ambady, N., Adams Jr, R. B. & Macrae, C. N. 2008 Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 95, 1019-1028. (doi:10.1037/a0013194)
3. Freeman, J. B., Ambady, N., Rule, N. O. & Johnson, K. L. 2008 Will a category cue attract you? Motor output reveals dynamic competition across person construal. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 137, 673-690. (doi:10. 1037/a0013875)
4. Johnson, K. L. & Tassinary, L. G. 2005 Perceiving sex directly and indirectly: meaning in motion and morphology. Psychol. Sci. 16, 890-897. (doi:10.1111/j. 1467-9280.2005.01633.x)
5. Johnston, L., Miles, L. & Macrae, C. N. 2010 Male or female? An investigation of factors that modulate the visual perception of another's sex. In Social psychology of visual perception (eds E. Balcetis & G. D. Lassiter), pp. 103-122. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
6. Runeson, S. & Frykholm, G. 1983 Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 112, 595-615. (doi:10.1037/0096-3445.112.4.585)
7. Chouchourelou, A., Matsuka, T., Harber, K. & Shiffrar, M. 2006 The visual analysis of emotional actions. Soc. Neurosci. 1, 63-74. (doi:10.1080/174709 10600630599)
8. Pollick, F. E., Lestou, V., Ryu, J. & Cho, S. B. 2002 Estimating the efficiency of recognizing gender and affect from biological motion. Vision Res. 20, 2345-2355. (doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00196-7)
9. Gunns, R. E., Johnston, L. & Hudson, S. M. 2002 Victim selection and kinematics: a point-light investigation of vulnerability to attack. J. Nonverbal Behav. 26, 129-158. (doi:10.1023/A:1020744915533)
10. Miller, S. L., Maner, J. K. & Becker, D. V. 2010 Selfprotective biases in group categorization: what shapes the psychological boundary between 'us' and 'them'? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 99, 62-77. (doi:10.1037/a0018086)
11. Zebrowitz, L. A. & Collins, M. A. 1997 Accurate social perception at zero acquaintance: the affordances of a Gibsonian approach. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 1, 204-223. (doi:10.1207/s15327957)
12. Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T. & Schaller, M. 2011 Human threat management systems: self-protection and disease avoidance. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35, 1042-1051. (doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.011)
13. Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Geiskevicius, V., Becker, D. V. & Schaller, M. 2010 Goal-driven cognition and functional behavior: the fundamental motives framework. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 19, 63-67. (doi:10.1177/ 0963721409359281)
14. Archer, J. 2004 Sex differences in aggression in realworld settings: a meta-analytic review. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 4, 291-322. (doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291)
15. Sell, A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Sznycer, D., von Rueden, C. & Gurven, M. 2009 Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 575-584. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1177)
16. Daly, M. & Wilson, M. 2003 Evolutionary psychology of lethal interpersonal violence. In The international handbook of research on violence (edsW. Heitmeyer & J. Hagan), pp. 709-734. New York, NY: Wesview.
17. Haselton, M. G. & Buss, D. M. 2000 Error management theory: a new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78, 81-91. (doi:10,1037110022-3514.78.1.81)
18. Haselton, M. G. & Nettle, D. 2006 The paranoid optimist: an integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 10, 47-66. (doi:10.1207/ s15327957pspr1001_3)
19. Johnson, K. L. & Tassinary, L. G. 2007 Compatibility of basic social perceptions determines perceived attractiveness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 5246-5251. (doi:10.1073/ pnas.0608181104)
20. Johnson, K. L., Lurye, L. E. & Tassinary, L. G. 2010 Sex categorization among preschool children: increasing sensitivity to sexually dimorphic cues. Child Dev. 81, 1346-1355. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01476.x)
21. Clauser, C. E., Tebbetts, I. O., Bradtmiller, B., McConville, J. T. & Gordon, C. C. 1987-1988 Measurer's handbook: US army anthropometric survey (technical report NATICK/TR-88/043, AD A202 721). Natick, MA: US Army.
22. Gordon, C. C., Bradtmiller, B., Churchill, T., Clauser, C. E., McConville, J. T., Tebbetts, I. O. & Walker, R. A. 1988 Anthropometric survey of US army personnel: methods and summary statistics (technical report NATICK/TR89/044, AD A225 094). Natick, MA: US Army.
23. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G. &Aiken, L. S. 2003Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M. & Ware, J. H. 2004 Applied longitudinal analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
25. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, S. S. & Congdon, R. 2011 HLM 7 for WINDOWS (computer software). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
26. Raudenbush, S. W. & Bryk, A. S. 2002 Hierarchical linear models, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
27. Todorov, A., Dotsch, R., Wigboldus, D. H. J. & Said, C. P. 2011 Data-driven methods for modeling social perception. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 5/10, 775-791. (doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00389.x)
28. Karremans, J. C., Dotsch, R. & Corneille, O. 2011 Romantic relationship status biases memory of faces of attractive opposite-sex others: evidence from a reversecorrelation paradigm. Cognition 121, 422-426. (doi:10. 1016/j.cognition.2011.07.008)
29. Schaller, M., Faulkner, J., Park, J. H., Neuberg, S. L. & Kenrick, D. T. 2004 Impressions of danger influence impressions of people: an evolutionary perspective on individual and collective cognition. J. Cult. Evol. Psychol. 2, 231-247. (doi:10.1556/JCEP.2.2004.3-4.4)
30. Gross, J. W. & Levenson, R. W. 1995 Emotion elicitation using films. Cogn. Emot. 9, 87-108. (doi:10.1080/ 02699939508408966)
31. Purdie-Vaughns, V. & Eibach, R. 2008 Intersectional invisibility: the ideological sources and social consequences of non-prototypicality. Sex Roles 50, 337-391. (doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4)
32. Strossner, S. J. 1996 Social categorization by race or sex: effects of perceived non-normalcy on response times. Soc. Cogn. 14, 247-276. (doi:10.1521/soco. 1996.14.3.247)
33. Smith, E. R. & Zarate, M. A. 1992 Exemplar-based model of social judgment. Psychol. Rev. 99, 3-21. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.3)
34. Lick, D. J., Johnson, K. L. & Gill, S. V. In press. Deliberate changes to gendered body motion influence basic social perceptions. Social Cogn.
35. Johnson, K. L., McKay, L. & Pollick, F. E. 2011 Why 'he throws like a girl' (but only when he's sad): emotion affects sex-decoding of biological motion displays. Cognition 119, 265-280. (doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011. 01.016)
36. Shouten, B., Troje, N. F. & Verfaille, K. 2011 The facing bias in biological motion perception: structure, kinematics, and body parts. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 73, 130-143. (doi:10.3758/s13414-010-0018-1)
37. Tassinary, L. G. & Hansen, K. A. 1998 A critical test of the waist-to-hip-ratio hypothesis of female physical attractiveness. Psychol. Sci. 9, 150-155. (doi:10.1111/ 1467-9280.00029)