Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the American nursing activity scale in an intensive care unit

Journal of Advanced Nursing

Volumn 68, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 2750-2755

  Luiking, Marie Louise ^a   van Linge, Roland ^b   Bras, Leo ^a   Grypdonck, Maria ^b,c   Aarts, Leon ^d  

^a ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^d LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Clinical autonomy; Dutch language; Instrument development; Intensive care; Nursing activity scale; Psychometric evaluation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MALE; NETHERLANDS; NURSING STAFF; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84869087357     PISSN: 03092402     EISSN: 13652648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06024.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Ashley J. (1976) Hospitals, Paternalism and the Role of the Nurse. Teachers College Press, New York.
2. Beecroft P.C., Kunzman L. & Krozek C. (2001) RN internship: outcomes of a one-year pilot program. Journal of Nursing Administration31, 575-582.
3. Clark C.L. (2004) The professional socialization of graduating students in generic and two-plus-two baccalaureate completion nursing programs. Journal of Nursing Education43(8), 346-351.
4. Flaherty J.A., Gaviria F.M., Pathak D., Mitchell T., Wintrob R., Richman J.A. & Birz S. (1988) Developing instruments for cross-cultural psychiatric research. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases176, 257-263.
5. George V., Burke L., Rodgers B., Duthie N., Hoffmann M., Koceja V., Kramer A., Maro J., Minzlaff P., Pelcznski S., Schmidt M., Westen B., Zielke J., Brukwitzki G. & Gehring L. (2002) Developing staff nurse shared leadership behavior in professional nursing practice. Nursing Administration Quarterly26(3), 44-59.
6. Kelly K.K. (2001) Nursing Activity Scale. In Measurement of Nursing Outcomes 2nd edn, Volume 1, Measuring Nursing Performance in Practice, Education and Research (Waltz C.A. & Jenkins L.S., eds), Springer Publishing Company, New York, pp. 253-266.
7. Koning A.J. & Franses P.H. (2003) Confidence Intervals for Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha, ERIM Report Series Research in Management. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/431 on 14 October 2009.
8. Krugman M. & Preheim G. (1999) Longitudinal evaluation of professional nursing practice design. Journal of Nursing Administration29(5), 10-20.
9. Martin P.A. (1995) Evaluation of shared governance. Journal of Shared Governance1(3), 11-15.
10. Polit D.F. (2010) Statistics and Data Analysis for Nursing Research. Pearson, Boston.
11. Schutzenhofer K.K. (1987) The measurement of professional autonomy. Journal of Professional Nursing3, 278-283.
12. Wade G.H. (1999) Professional nurse autonomy: concept analysis and application to nursing education. Journal of Advanced Nursing30, 310-318.
13. Weston M. (2009) Validity of instruments for measuring autonomy and control over nursing practice. Journal of Nursing Scholarship41(1), 87-94.