Insights into the morphology of the Serra da Cangalha impact structure from geophysical modeling

Meteoritics and Planetary Science

Volumn 47, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1659-1670

  Vasconcelos, M A R ^a   Wunnemann K ^b   Crosta A P ^a   Molina, E C ^c   Reimold, W U ^b   Yokoyama, E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869083510     PISSN: 10869379     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/maps.12001     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adepelumi A. A., Fontes S. L., Schnegg P. A., and Flexor J. M. 2005a. An integrated magnetotelluric and aeromagnetic investigation of the Serra da Cangalha impact crater, Brazil. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 150:159-181.
2. Adepelumi A. A., Flexor J. M., and Fontes S. L. 2005b. An appraisal of the Serra da Cangalha impact structure using the Euler deconvolution method. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 40:1149-1157.
3. Amsden A. A., Ruppel H. M., and Hirt C. W. 1980. SALE: Simplified ALE computer program for fluid flow at all speeds, LA-8095. Los Alamos, New Mexico: Los Alamos National Laboratory. 101 p.
4. Artemieva N., Krap T., and Milkereit B. 2004. Investigating the Lake Bosumtwi impact structure: Insight from numerical modeling. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems 5:Q11016, doi:10.1029/2004GC000733.
5. Assumpção M., Lima T. M., and Tomás L. A. R. 1986. O sismo de Araguapaz de 14.01.1986 e o Lineamento Transbrasiliano. In: 34 Congresso Brasileiro de Geologia, Goiânia, Anais. Goiânia, SBG 6: 2573-2580.
6. Bizzi L. A., Schobbenhaus C., Vidotti R. M., and Gonçalves J. H. 2003. Geologia, tectônica e recursos minerais do Brasil. Brasilia: CPRM. 692 p.
7. Collins G. S., Melosh H. J., and Ivanov B. A. 2004. Modeling damage and deformation in impact simulations. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 39:217-231.
8. Cooper G. R. J. 2002. An improved algorithm for the Euler deconvolution of potential field data. The Leading Edge 21:1197-1198.
9. Cordani U. G., D'Agrella-Filho M. S., Brito-Neves B. B., and Trindade R. I. F. 2003. Tearing up Rodinia: the Neoproterozoic palaeogeography of South American cratonic fragments. Terra Nova 15:350-359.
10. Elbeshausen D., Wünnemann K., and Collins G. S. 2009. Scaling of oblique impacts in frictional targets: Implications for crater size and formation mechanisms. Icarus 204:716-731.
11. Goldin T. J., Wünnemann K., Melosh H. J., and Collins G. S. 2006. Hydrocode modeling of the Sierra Madera impact structure. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 41:1947-1958, doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2006.tb00462.x.
12. Grieve R. A. F. 1998. Extraterrestrial impacts on Earth: the evidence and the consequences. In Flux with time and impact effects, edited by Grady M. M., Hutchison R., McCall G. J. H., and Rothery D. A. Geological Society of London Special Publication 140. London: Meteorites: Geological Society of London. pp. 105-131.
13. Grieve R. A. F. and Pesonen L. J. 1992. The terrestrial impact cratering record. Tectonophysics 216:1-30.
14. Grieve R. A. F. and Pilkington M. 1996. The signature of terrestrial impacts. AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics 16:399-420.
15. Hasui Y., and Ponçano W. L. 1978. Geossuturas e sismicidade no Brasil. In Anais do 2 Congresso Brasileiro de Geologia de Engenharia, São Paulo. São Paulo: ABGE/IPT 1. pp.331-338.
16. Hsu S.-K., Coppens D., and Shyu C.-T. 1998. Depth to magnetic source using the generalized analytic signal. Geophysics 63:1947-1957.
17. Ivanov B. A. and Kostuchenko V. N. 1997. Block oscillation mode crater collapse (abstract #1868). 27th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. CD-ROM.
18. Ivanov B. A., Deniem D., and Neukum G. 1997. Implementation of dynamic strength models into 2D hydrocodes: Application for atmospheric breakup and impact cratering. International Journal of Impact Engineering 17:375-386.
19. Kane M. F. 1962. A comprehensive system of terrain corrections using a digital computer. Geophysics 27:455-462.
20. Keating P. and Pilkington M. 2004. Euler deconvolution of the analytical signal and its application to magnetic interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting 52:165-182.
21. Kenkmann T., Vasconcelos M. A. R., Crósta A. P., and Reimold W. U. 2011. The complex impact structure Serra da Cangalha, Tocantins State, Brazil. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 46:875-889.
22. Marini O. J., Fuck R. A., Dardenne M. A., and Dani J. C. 1984. Província Tocantins: Setores central e sudeste. In O pré-Cambriano do Brasil, edited by Almeida F. F. M. and Hasui Y. São Paulo: Edgar Blucher. pp. 205-264.
23. McHone J. F. 1986. Terrestrial impact structures: Their detection and verification with two new examples from Brasil. Ph.D. thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
24. Melosh H. J. 1979. Acoustic fluidization: A new geologic process. Journal of Geophysical Research 84:7513-7520.
25. Melosh H. J. 1989. Impact cratering: A geologic process. New York: Oxford University Press. 245 p.
26. 2. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 42, 2079-2098.
27. Melosh H. J. and Ivanov B. A. 1999. Impact crater collapse. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science 27:385-415.
28. Minty B. R. S. 1991. Simple micro-leveling for aeromagnetic aeromagnetic data. Exploration Geophysics 22:591-592.
29. Nabighian M. N. 1972. The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with poligonal cross section: Its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation. Geophysics 37:507-517.
30. Nabighian M. N. 1974. Additional comments on the analytical signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross section. Geophysics 39:85-92.
31. Ojeda H. and Bembon F. C. 1966. Mapeamento geológico em semidetalhe do sudoeste de Riachão. Relatório interno da Petrobrás 260, 73 p.
32. Parasnis D. S. 1986. Principles of applied geophysics, 4th ed. London: Chapman & Hall.
33. Pesonen L. J., Elo S., Lehtinen M., Jokinen T., Puranen R., and Kivekäs L. 1999. Lake Karikkoselkä impact structure, central Finland: New geophysical and petrographic results. In Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution II, edited by Dressler B. O. and Sharpton V. L. Geological Society of America Special Paper 339. Boulder, Colorado: Geological Society of America. pp. 131-147.
34. Pierazzo E., Vickery A. M., and Melosh H. J. 1997. A reevaluation of impact melt production. Icarus 127:408-423.
35. Pilkington M., and Grieve R. A. F. 1992. The geophysical signature of terrestrial impact craters. Reviews of Geophysics 30:161-181.
36. Pilkington M., and Hildebrand A. R. 2003. Transient and disruption cavity dimensions of complex terrestrial impact structures derived from magnetic data. Geophysical Research Letters 30:2087, doi: 10.1029/2003GL018294.
37. Rasmussen R., and Pedersen L. B. 1979. End corrections in potential field modeling. Geophysical Prospecting 27:749-760.
38. Ravat D., Kirkham K., and Hildenbrand T. G. 2002. A source-depth separation filter: Using the Euler method on the derivatives of total intensity magnetic anomaly data. The Leading Edge 21:360-365.
39. Reid A. B., Allsop J. M., Granser H., Millett A. J., and Somerton I. W. 1990. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics 55:80-91.
40. Reynolds J. M. 2000. An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 796 p.
41. Roest W. R., Verhoef J., and Pilkington M. 1992. Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal. Geophysics 57:116-125.
42. Spector A. and Grant F. S. 1970. Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic data. Geophysics 35:293-302.
43. Talwani M., and Heirtzler D. 1964. Computation of magnetic anomalies caused by two-dimensional structures of arbitrary shape. In: Computers in the mineral industry. Stanford, California: School of Earth Sciences, Stanford University.
44. Tawani M., Worzel J. L., and Landisman M. 1959. Rapid gravity computations for two-dimensional bodies with application to the Mendocino submarine fracture zone. Journal of Geophysical Research 64:49-59.
45. Telford W. M., Geldart L. P, Sheriff R. E., and Keys D. A. 1991. Applied geophysics. New York: Cambridge University Press. 860 p.
46. Thompson D. T. 1982. EULDPH-A new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics 47:31-37.
47. Thompson S. L. and Lauson H. S. 1972. Report SC-RR-710714. Albuquerque, New Mexico: Sandia Labs. 119 p.
48. Tsikalas F., Gudlaugsson S. T., Faleide J. I., and Eldholm O. 2002. The Mjolnir marine impact crater porosity anomaly. Deep-sea Research 49:1103-1120.
49. Ugalde H., Danuor S. K., and Milkereit B. 2007. Integrated 3-D model from gravity and petrohysical data at the Bosumtwi impact structure, Ghana. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 42:859-866.
50. Ussami N., and Molina E. C. 1993. Gravity map of Brazil II: Regional and residual gravity anomalies and their correlation with major tectonic provinces. Journal of Geophysical Research 98:2199-2208.
51. Vasconcelos M. A. R. 2012. Estudo geofísico de quatro prováveis estruturas de impacto localizadas na Bacia do Parnaíba e detalhamento geológico/geofísico da estrutura de Serra da Cangalha/TO. PhD. thesis, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
52. Vasconcelos M. A. R., Góes A. M., Crósta A. P., Kenkmann T., and Reimold W. U. 2010a. Serra da Cangalha impact structure, Parnaíba basin, northeastern Brazil: Target characterization and stratigraphic estimates of the uplift (abstract #1868). 41st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. CD-ROM.
53. Vasconcelos M. A. R., Crósta A. P., and Molina E. C. 2010b. Geophysical characteristics of four possible impact structures in the Parnaíba Basin, Brazil: Comparison and implications. In Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution IV, edited by Gibson R. L. and Reimold W. U. GSA Special Paper 465. Boulder, Colorado: Geological Society of America. pp. 201-217.
54. Wünnemann K. and Ivanov B. A. 2003a. Numerical modelling of the impact crater depth-diameter dependence in an acoustically fluidized target. Planetary and Space Science 51:831-845.
55. Wünnemann K., Morgan J. V., and Jödicke H. 2005. Is Ries crater typical for its size? An analysis based on old and new geophysical data and numerical modeling. In Large meteorite impacts III, edited by Kenkmann T., Hörz F., and Deutsch A. Washington, D.C.: Geological Society of America. pp. 67-83.
56. Wünnemann K., Collins G. S., and Melosh H. J. 2006. A strain-based porosity model for use in hydrocode simulations of impacts and implications for transient crater growth in porous targets. Icarus 180: 514-527.
57. Wünnemann K., Kühn H., Janle P., and Kenkmann T. 2011. The Waqf as Suwwan impact crater, Jordan: Numerical modeling of crater formation and gravity data (abstract #1700). 42nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. CD-ROM.