Growth and yield performance of Jerusalem artichoke clones in a semiarid region of China

Agronomy Journal

Volumn 104, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1538-1546

  Liu, Zu Xin ^a   Spiertz, J H J ^b   Sha, Jing ^a   Xue, Shuai ^a   Xie, Guang Hui ^a  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HELIANTHUS TUBEROSUS;

EID: 84869072827     PISSN: 00021962     EISSN: 14350645     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2012.0091     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Baker, R.J. 1988. Differential response to environmental stress. In: B.S. Weir et al., editors, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Quantitative Genetics, Raleigh, NC. 30 May-5 June 1987. Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland, MA. p. 492-504.
2. Baldini, M., F. Danuso, A. Monti, T. Amaducci, P. Stevanato, and G.D. Mastro. 2006. Chicory and Jerusalem artichoke productivity in different areas of Italy, in relation to water availability and time of harvest. Ital. J. Agron. 1:291-308. doi:10.4081/ija.2006.291
3. Baldini, M., F. Danuso, A. Rocca, E. Bulfoni, A. Monti, and G.D. Mastro. 2011. Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) productivity in different Italian growing areas: A modelling approach. Ital. J. Agron. 6:126-132.
4. Baldini, M., F. Danuso, M. Turi, and G.P. Vannozzi. 2004. Evaluation of new clones of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) for inulin and sugar yield from stalks and tubers. Ind. Crops Prod. 19:25-40. doi:10.1016/S0926-6690(03)00078-5
5. Cheng, Y., W.G. Zhou, C.F. Gao, K. Lan, Y. Gao, and Q.Y. Wu. 2009. Biodiesel production from Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) tuber by heterotrophic microalgae Chlorella protothecoides. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 84:777-781. doi:10.1002/jctb.2111
6. Clarke, J.M., T.F. Townley-Smith, T.N. McCaig, and D.G. Green. 1984. Growth analysis of spring wheat cultivars of varying drought resistance. Crop Sci. 24:537-541. doi:10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400030026x
7. Curt, M.D., P. Aguado, M. Sanz, G. Sànchez, and J. Fernàndez. 2006. Clone precocity and the use of Helianthus tuberosus L. stems for bioethanol. Ind. Crops Prod. 24:314-320. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2006.06.003
8. Denoroy, P. 1996. The crop physiology of Helianthus tuberosus L.: A model oriented view. Biomass Bioenergy 11:11-32. doi:10.1016/0961-9534(96)00006-2
9. Ercoli, L., M. Marriotti, and A. Masoni. 1992. Protein concentrate and ethanol production from Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Agric. Mediterr. 122:340-351.
10. Fernández, J., M.D. Curt, and M. Martinez. 1988. Productivity of several Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) clones in Soria (Spain) for two consecutive years (1987 and 1988). In: G. Gosse and G. Grassi, editors, Topinambour (Jerusalem artichoke). Rep. EUR 13405. Commiss. Eur. Commun., Luxembourg. p. 61-66.
11. Fischer, R.A., and R. Maurer. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars: I. Grain yield response. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 29:897-907. doi:10.1071/AR9780897
12. Huang, X., J. Ge, and Y. Shen. 2004. A review of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) developing in Qinghai plateau. (In Chinese with English abstract.) Acta Agric. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2:35-38.
13. Kays, S.J., and F. Kultur. 2005. Genetic variation in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) flowering date and duration. HortScience 40:1675-1678.
14. Kays, S.J., and S.F. Nottingham. 2008. Biology and chemistry of Jerusalem artichoke. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
15. Kiehn, F.A., and B.B. Chubey. 1993. Variability in agronomic and compositional characteristics of Jerusalem artichoke. In: A. Fuchs, editor, Inulin and inulin-containing crops. Elsevier, Amsterdam. P.1-9.
16. Klass, D.L. 1998. Biomass for renewable energy, fuels, and chemicals. Academic Press, San Diego.
17. Lehtomäki, A. 2006. Biogas production from energy crops and crop residues. Jyväskylä Stud. Biol. Environ. Sci. 163. Univ. of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland. https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/bitstream/handle/123456789/13152/9513925595.pdf.
18. Lelio, H., C. Rebora, and L. Gomez. 2009. Ethanol potential production from Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) irrigated with urban waste water. (In Spanish with English abstract.) Rev. Fac. Cienc. Agrari. Univ. Nac. Cuyo 41:123-133
19. Li, X., S. Hou, M. Su, M. Yang, S. Shen, G. Jiang, et al. 2010. Major energy plants and their potential for bioenergy development in China. Environ. Manage. 46:579-589. doi:10.1007/s00267-010-9443-0
20. Liu, Z.X., L.P. Han, S. Yosef, and G.H. Xie. 2011. Genetic variation and yield performance of Jerusalem artichoke germplasm collected in China. Agric. Sci. China 10:668-678. doi:10.1016/S1671-2927(11)60049-7
21. Losavio, N., N. Lamascese, and A.V. Vonella. 1997. Water requirements and nitrogen fertilization in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) grown under Mediterranean conditions. Acta Hortic. 449:205-210.
22. Lyu, S.W., and S.D. Song. 1986. Biomass production and phosphorus inflow in three perennial herb populations in the basin of the Mt. Geumoh. Korean J. Bot. 29:95-107.
23. Mecella, G., P. Scandella, U. Neri, N.D. Blasi, R. Moretti, A. Troisi, et al. 1996. The productive and chemical evolution of the Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) under various conditions of irrigation. Agric. Mediterr. 126:233-239.
24. Meijer, W.J.M., and E.W.J.M. Mathijssen. 1991. The relationship between flower initiation and sink strength of stems and tubers of Jerusalem artichoke. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 39:123-135.
25. Mimiola, G. 1988. Test of topinambour cultivation in southern Italy. In: G. Grassi and G. Gosse, editors, Topinambour (Jerusalem artichoke). Rep EUR 11855. Commiss. Eur. Commun., Luxembourg. p. 53-60.
26. Monti, A., M.T. Amaducci, and G. Venturi. 2005. Growth response, leaf gas exchange and fructans accumulation of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) as affected by different water regimes. Eur. J. Agron. 23:136-145. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2004.11.001
27. Pimsaen, W., S. Jogloy, B. Suriharn, T. Kesmala, V. Pensuk, and A. Patanothai. 2010. Genotype by environment (G×E) interactions for yield components of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Asian J. Plant Sci. 9:11-19. doi:10.3923/ajps.2010.11.19
28. Qin, Z., Q. Zhuang, X. Zhu, X. Cai, and X. Zhang. 2011. Carbon consequences and agricultural implications of growing biofuel crops on marginal agricultural lands in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45:10765-10772. doi:10.1021/es2024934
29. Rodrigues, M.A., J.E. Sousa, J.E. Cabanas, and M. Arrobas. 2007. Tuber yield and leaf mineral composition of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) grown under different cropping practices. Span. J. Agric. Res. 5:545-553.
30. Rutkauskas, G. 2005. Research on the characteristics of energy plant biofuel and combustion ability subject to harvest time. In: V. Kucinskas, editor, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on New Technological Processes and Investigation Methods for Agricultural Engineering, Raudondvariz, Lithuania. 8-9 Sept. 2005. Inst. Agric. Eng., Raudondvariz, Lithuania. p. 350-356.
31. Sang, T., and W.X. Zhu. 2011. China's bioenergy potential. GCB Bioenergy 3:79-90. doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01064.x
32. SAS Institute. 2005. SAS user' guide: Statistic. Version 9.13, SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
33. Sawicka, B., and W. Michaek. 2005. Evaluation and productivity of Helianthus tuberosus L. in the conditions of the central-east Poland. Electron. J. Polish Agric. Univ. 8(3):42. www.ejpau.media.pl/volume8/issue3/art-42.html.
34. Schittenhelm, S. 1999. Agronomic performance of root chicory, Jerusalem artichoke, and sugarbeet in stress and nonstress environments. Crop Sci. 39:1815-1823. doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.3961815x
35. Schmer, M.R., K.P. Vogel, R.B. Mitchell, and R.K. Perrin. 2008. Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105:464-469. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704767105
36. Serieys, H., I. Souyris, A. Gil, B. Poinso, and A. Bervillé. 2010. Diversity of Jerusalem artichoke clones (Helianthus tuberosus L.) from the INRA-Montpellier collection. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 57:1207-1215. doi:10.1007/s10722-010-9560-x
37. Sluiter, A., B. Hames, D. Hyman, C. Payne, R. Ruiz, C. Scarlata, et al. 2008. Determination of total solids in biomass and total dissolved solids in liquid process samples. Tech. Rep. NREL TP-510-42621. Natl. Renew. Energy Lab., Golden, CO.
38. Stauffer, M.D., B.B. Chubey, and D.G. Dorrell. 1981. Growth, yield and compositional characteristics of Jerusalem artichoke as they relate to biomass production. In: D.L. Klass and G.H. Emert, editors, Fuels from biomass and wastes. Ann Arbor Sci. Publ., Ann Arbor, MI. p. 79-97.
39. Stolzenburg, K. 2006. Topinambur (Helianthus tuberosus L.): Rohstofffür die Ethanolgewinnung. Landesanstalt für Pflanzenbau, Forchheim, Germany.
40. Tian, Y.S., L.X. Zhao, H.B. Meng, L.Y. Sun, and J.Y. Yan. 2009. Estimation of un-used land potential for biofuels development in People's Republic of China. Appl. Energy 86:S77-S85. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.06.007
41. Tutt, M., and J. Olt. 2011. Suitability of various plant species for bioethanol production. Agron. Res. 9(Spec. Iss. 1):261-267.
42. Umetrics. 2002. User's guide to Simca-P+. Version 11.5. Umetrics AB, Umea, Sweden.
43. Yan, W., and I. Rajcan. 2002. Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci. 42:11-20. doi:10.2135/cropsci2002.0011
44. Zhao, G.M., Z.P. Liu, H. Wang, and B. Zhang. 2009. Studies on the use of saline heterologous aquaculture waste water to develop biofuel plant (Jerusalem artichoke) in salinized coastal areas. (In Chinese with English abstract.) Agric. Res. Arid Areas 27:107-111.
45. Zhuang, D.F., D. Jiang, L. Liu, and Y.H. Huang. 2011. Assessment of bioenergy potential on marginal land in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15:1050-1056. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.041