The crop physiology of Helianthus tuberosus L.: A model orientated view

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 11-32

  Denoroy, P ^a,b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

development; fructan; growth; Helianthus tuberosus L.; Jerusalem artichoke; model; reserves; tuber

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; FOOD PRODUCTS; FRUCTOSE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANTS (BOTANY);

FRUCTAN; HELIANTHUS TUBEROSUS; JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE; STOLONISATION; TUBERISATION;

CROPS;

CYNARA SCOLYMUS; HELIANTHUS TUBEROSUS;

EID: 0030465894     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0961-9534(96)00006-2     Document Type: Article

References (114)

1. 1. W. Pilnik and G. J. Vervelde, Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) as a source of fructose, a natural alternative sweetener. Z. Acker Pflanzenbau 142, 153-160 (1976).
2. 2. P. T. Delbetz, Du Topinambour. Culture, Panification et Distillation de ce Tubercule. A. Goin, Paris, 174 pp. (1867).
3. 3. H. Morrenhof and C. B. Bus, Aardper, een potentieel nieuw gewas-teeltonderzoek 1986-1989. Verslag, 99, Research Station for Arable Farming and Field Production of Vegetable (PAGV), Lelystad, 66 pp. (1990).
4. 4. G. Zonin, Materie prime agricole per la produzione del bioetanolo: il topinambur. Tesi del Universita Degli Studi, Facolta di Agraria, Bologna, 316 pp. (1986).
5. 5. J. E. Carrasco, Experience on Jerusalem Artichoke tuber conversion into ethanol. Topinambour (Jerusalem Artichoke), Proc. First EEC Workshop on Jerusalem Artichoke, G. Grassi, G. Gosse (eds), Madrid 30 September-1 October 1987, ECC Report EUR 11855, Luxembourg (1988).
6. 6. J. Barloy and J. Fernandez, Synthesis on Jerusalem Artichoke projects. Topinambour (Jerusalem artichoke) Proc. 2nd ECC Workshop on Jerusalem Artichoke, G. Gosse, G. Grassi (eds), Rennes 6-8 December 1988. EEC Report EUR 13405, Luxembourg (1991).
7. 7. M. D. Stauffer, B. B. Chubey and D. G. Dorrell, Growth, yield and compositional characteristics of Jerusalem artichoke as they relate to biomass production. Fuels from Biomass and Wastes. D. L. Klasss, G. H. Emert (eds), Ann Arbor Science Publishers Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, 79 pp. (1981).
8. 8. E. Baillarge, Le Topinambour. Ses Usages, sa Culture. Flammarion, Paris (1942).
9. 9. J. Zubr, Methanogenic fermentation of fresh and ensiled plant materials. Biomass 11, 159-171 (1986).
10. 10. T. Kieboom and B. Kuster, Inuline en fructose als grondstof voor (nieuwe) chemische produkten. Koolhydraten in Nederland, 1988/3 (1988).
11. 11. A. Fuchs, Unulin and inulin containing crops. Studies in Plant Sciences, Vol. 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 417 pp. (1993).
12. 12. R. K. M. Hay and N. W. Offer, Helianthus tuberosus as an alternative forage crop for cool maritime regions - a preliminary study of the yield and nutritional quality of shoot tissues from perennial stands. J. Sci. Food Agric. 60, 2, 213-221 (1992).
13. 13. P. D. Rawate and R. M. Hill, Extraction of a high-protein isolate from Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) tops and evaluation of its nutrition potential. J. agric. Food Chem. 33, 1, 29-31 (1985).
14. 14. C. Moule, V. Tsvetoukhine, G. Dupuis, M. Renault, Contribution a l'etude du topinambour-ensilage. INRA, Rennes, 83 pp. (1967)
15. 15. J. S. D. Bacon and J. Edelman, The carbohydrates of the Jerusalem artichoke and other Compositae. Biochem. J. 48, 114-126 (1951).
16. 16. N. Kosaric, G. P. Cosentino, A. Wieczorek and Z. Duvnjak, The Jerusalem Artichoke as an agricultural crop. Biomass 5, 1-36 (1984).
17. 17. M. Ben Chekroun, Evolution hivernale des glucides (inuline et polyfructosanes) dans les tubercules de topinambour (Helianthus tuberosus L.) et la racine de chicoree (Cichorium intybus L.). Thèse Universite de Limoges, 146 pp. (1990).
18. 18. M. Pavlides, Bibliography. Topinambour (Jerusalem Artichoke), Proc. first EEC workshop on Jerusalem Artichoke, G. Grassi and G. Gosse (eds), Madrid, 30 September-1 October 1987, ECC Report EUR 11855, Luxembourg (1988).
19. 19. C. J. Swanton, P. B. Cavers, D. R. Clements and M. J. Moore, The biology of candian weeds, 101. Helianthus tuberosus L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 72, 4, 1367-1382 (1992).
20. 20. N. Kosaric, A. Wieczorek, G. P. Cosentino and Z. Duvnjak, Industrial processing and products from the Jerusalem Artichoke. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 32, 1-24 (1985).
21. 21. G. Gosse and G. Grassi, Topinambour (Jerusalem artichoke), EEC Report EUR 13405, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 150 pp. (1991).
22. 22. G. Grassi and G. Gosse, Topinambour (Jerusalem artichoke), EEC Report EUR 11855, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 213 pp. (1988).
23. 23. M. Suzuki and N. J. Chatterton, Science and Technology of Fructans. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1993).
24. 24. H. van Keulen and J. Wolf, Modelling of agricultural production: weather, soils and crops. Simulation monograph 25, PUDOC, Wageningen, 464 pp. (1986).
25. 25. J.-M. Allirand, M. Chartier, G. Gosse, M. Lauransot and P. Bonchretien, Jerusalem Artichoke productivity modelling. Topinambour (Jerusalem Artichoke), Proc. First EEC Workshop on Jerusalem Artichoke, G. Grassi and G. Gosse (eds), Madrid, 30 September-1 October 1987. ECC Report EUR 11855, Luxembourg (1988).
26. 26. T. Becquer, Contribution a une modelisation d'elaboration de la biomasse chez le topinambour (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Memoire de D.A.A. Productions Vegetales et Amelioration des Plantes, E.N.S.A. Rennes, 43 pp. + appendix (1985).
27. 27. E. Lemercier, Elaboration de la biomasse chez le topinambour et bilan glucidique a differents stades du developpement. These Univesite Rennes I, 110 pp. + appendix (1987).
28. 28. C. J. T. Spitters, Modelling crop growth and tubers yield in Helianthus tuberosus. Topinambour (Jerusalem Artichoke), Proc. First EEC Workshop on Jerusalem Artichoke, G. Grassi and G. Gosse (eds), Madrid, 30 September-1 October 1987, ECC Report EUR 11855, Luxembourg (1988).
29. 29. P. Denoroy, Jerusalem artichoke productivity modelling, Inulin and inulin containing crops. Studies in Plants Science 3, 45-50 (1993).
30. 30. A. N. Hang and G. C. Gilliland, Growth and carbohydrate characteristics of Jerusalem artichoke in irrigated Central Washington. Agricultural Research Center. Washington State University, 10 pp. (1982).
31. 31. P. Denoroy, Le topinambour (Helianthus tuberosus L.): synthese bibliographique. INRA Bioclimatologie, Grignon, 79 pp. + 73 pp. (1994).
32. 32. C. B. Heiser, D. Smith, S. Clevenger and W. C. Martin, The North American Sunflower, Chap. 28, pp. 126-131, in Memoirs of the Torrey Botanical Club, 218 p. (1969).
33. 33. F. Le Cochec, Variabilite genetique, heritabilite et correlations de 15 caracteres d'une population de clones de topinambour (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Agronomie 90, 10, 797-806 (1990).
34. 34. W. J. M. Meijer, E. W. J. M. Mathijssen and G. E. L. Borm, Crop characteristics and inulin production of Jerusalem artichoke and chicory. Inulin and inulin containing crops. Studies in Plants Science 3, 29-38 (1993).
35. 35. A. C. Cassells and M. Deadman, Multiannual, multilocal trials of Jerusalem artichoke in the south of Ireland: soil, pH and potassium. Inulin and inulin containing crops. Studies in Plants Science 3, 21-27 (1993).
36. 36. L. D. Incoll and T. F. Neales, The stem as a temporary sink before tuberization in Helianthus tuberosus. J. exp. Bot. 21, 67, 469-476 (1970).
37. 37. C. J. T. Spitters, M. Lootsma and M. van de Waart, The contrasting growth pattern of early and late varieties in Helianthus tuberosus. Topinambour (Jerusalem Artichoke), Proc. First EEC Workshop on Jerusalem Artichoke, G, Grassi and G. Gosse (eds). Madrid, September-1 October 1987, ECC Report EUR 11855, Luxembourg (1988).
38. 38. C. J. Pollock, Fructans and the metabolism of sucrose in vascular plants. New Phytol. 104, 1, 1-24 (1986).
39. 39. C. J. T. Spitters, Genetic variation in growth pattern and yield formation in Helianthus tuberosus L. EUCARPIA. Proc. Workshop on Evaluation of Genetic Resources for Industrial Purposes, FAL, Braunschweig-Volkenrode (1987).
40. 40. J. Zubr and H. S. Pedersen, Characteristics of growth and development of different Jerusalem artichoke cultivars. Inulin and inulin containing crops. Studies in Plants Science 3, 11-19 (1993).
41. 41. J. Fernandez, M. D. Curt and M. Martinez, Productivity of several Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) clones in Soria (Spain) for two consecutive years (1987 and 1988). Topinambour (Jerusalem artichoke), Proc. 2nd ECC Workshop on Jerusalem Artichoke, G. Gosse and G. Grassi (eds), Rennes, 6-8 December 1988, EEC Report EUR 13405. Luxembourg (1991).
42. 42. G. Gosse, C. Varlet-Grancher, R. Bonhomme, M. Chartier, J. M. Allirand and G, Lemaire, Production maximale de matiere seche et rayonnement intercepte par un couvert vegetal. Agronomie 6, 1, 47-56 (1986).
43. 43. J. Barloy, Techniques of cultivation of the Jerusalem Artichoke. Topinambour (Jerusalem Artichoke), Proc. First EEC Workshop on Jerusalem Artichoke, G. Grassi and G. Gosse (eds), Madrid, 30 September-1 October 1987. ECC Report EUR 11855, Luxembourg (1988).
44. 44. J. C. Couduroux, Etude du mecanisme physiologique de la tuberisation chez le topinambour (Helianthus tuberosus L.), These Universite Clermont-Ferrand, Masson, Paris, 355 pp. (1966).
45. 45. J. P. Milord, Cycle de developpement de deux varietes de topinambour (Helianthus tuberosus L.) en conditions naturelles. Evolution physiologique et conservation des tubercules durant la periode hivernale. These Universite Limoges, 88pp. (1987).
46. 46. F. K. Claver, Effecto de algunos reguladores del crecimiento y de la temperatura sobre la formacion de vastagos y tuberculos de topinambur. Phyton 23, 1, 5-9 (1966).
47. 47. M. Gendraud, Tuberisation, dormance et synthese in situ des RNA chez le topinambour (Helianthus tuberosus cv. D19). Biol. Plant. 17, 17-22 (1975).
48. 48. W. W. Garner and H. A. Allard, Further studies in photoperiodism, the response of the plant to relative length of day and night. J. Agric. Res. 23, 11, 871-920 (1923).
49. 49. N. Mezencev, Premiers resultats des essais 1984 AZF/AFME sur topinambours/betteraves en Midi-Pyrenees. AZF/CdF Chimie, Toulouse, 26 pp. (1985).
50. 50. J. Barloy, Etudes sur les bases genetiques, agronomiques et physiologiques de la culture de topinambour (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Rapport COMES-AFME 1982-1983, Laboratoire d'Agronomie, INRA, Rennes, 41 pp. (1984).
51. 51. J. Zubr, Jerusalem Artichoke as a field crop in northern Europe. Topinambour (Jerusalem Artichoke), Proc. First EEC Workshop on Jerusalem Artichoke, G. Grassi and G. Gosse (eds), Madrid, 30 September-1 October 1987. ECC Report EUR 11855, Luxembourg (1988).
52. 52. V. Tsvetoukhine, Contribution a l'etude de varietes de Topinambour. Annal. Amelior. Plant. 10, 3, 275-307 (1960).
53. 53. F. Cors and A. Falisse, Etude des perspectives de culture du topinambour en region limoneuse belge. Centre de Recherche Phytotechnique sur les Proteagineux et Oleagineux, Faculte de Science, Gembloux, 72 pp. (1980).
54. 54. C. J. T. Spitters and H. K. Morrenhof, Growth analysis of cultivars of Helianthus tuberosus L. EEC contract Report No. EN3B-0040-NL (1987).
55. 55. J. Fernandez, P. Mazon, M. Ballesteros, N. Carreras, Summary of the research on Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) in Spain along the 7 last years. Topinambour (Jerusalem Artichoke), Proc. first EEC workshop on Jerusalem Artichoke, G. Grassi and G. Gosse (eds), Madrid, 30 September-1 October 1987, ECC Report EUR 11855. Luxembourg (1988).
56. 56. J. Barloy, J. Le Pierres, Productivite de differents clones de topinambour (Helianthus tuberosus L.) a Rennes pendant deux annees (1987-1988). Topinambour (Jerusalem Artichoke), Proc. 2nd ECC Workshop on Jerusalem Artichoke, G. Gosse and G. Grassi (eds), Rennes, 6-8 December 1988, EEC Report EUR 13405. Luxembourg (1991).
57. 57. K. Hogetsu, Y. Oshima, B. Midorikawa, K. Tezuka, M. Sakamoto, I. Mototani and I. Kimura, Growth analytical studies on the artificial communities of Helianthus tuberosus with different densities. Jpn. J. Bot. 17, 278-305 (1960).
58. 58. G. Soja and G. Dersch, Plant development and hormonal status in the Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Ind. Crop Prod. 1, 219-228 (1993).
59. 59. F. Jouis, Contribution a l'etude de la mise en place de l'indice foliaire chez le Topinambour (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Memoire de D.E.A. Sciences Agronomiques, Universite Rennes I, 45 pp. (1985).
60. 60. J. Edelman, Physiological and biochemical aspects of carbohydrate metabolism during tuber growth. The growth of the potato. Proc. 10th Easter School in Agricultural Science, J. D. Ivins and F. L. Milthorpe (eds). University of Nottingham, London (1963).
61. 61. J. Y. Le Friant, Contribution a l'etude de l'interception lumineuse par un couvert de topinambour. Repartition temporelle de la matiere seche. DEA Sciences Agronomiques. ENSAR-Universite Rennes I, 60 pp. + appendix (1983).
62. 62. R. Lemeur, A method for simulating the direct solar radiation regime in sunflower, Jerusalem artichoke, corn and soybean canopies using actual stand structure data, Agric. Meteorol., 12, 229-247 (1973).
63. 63. A. Ehrgashev, Intensity and dynamics of formation of the products of photosynthesis by Jerusalem artichoke. Fiziol. i biokhim. kul'turnykh rastenij 8, 3, 299-303 (1976).
64. 64. G. Soja and E. Haunold, Leaf gas exchange and tuber yield in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) cultivars. Field Crop Res. 26, 241-252 (1991).
65. 65. J. Barloy, Yield elaboration of Jerusalem Artichoke. Topinambour (Jerusalem Artichoke), Proc. First EEC Workshop on Jerusalem Artichoke, G. Grassi and G. Gosse (eds), Madrid, 30 September-1 October 1987, ECC Report EUR 11855, Luxembourg (1988).
66. 66. S. Schubert and R. Feuerle, Effect of shading on carbohydrate metabolism of shoot and inulin storage in tubers of two cultivars of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Proc. 2nd ESA Congress, Warwick, pp. 138-139 (1992).
67. 67. C. J. Swanton and P. B. Cavers, Biomass and nutrient allocation pattern in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus). Can. J. Bot. 67, 2880-2887 (1989).
68. 68. G. J. Seiler, Protein and mineral concentrations in tubers of selected genotypes of wild and cultivated Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Econ. Bot. 44, 3, 322-335 (1990).
69. 69. G. Soja and P. Liebhard, Yield, nutrient and sugar analysis during tuber formation of three different varieties of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) at different stages of maturity. Bodenkultur 35, 4, 317-327 (1984).
70. 70. G. J. Seiler, Protein and mineral concentration of selected wild sunflower species. Agron. J. 76, 289-294 (1984).
71. 71. P. J. Newton, B. A. Myers and D. W. West, Reduction in growth and yield of Jerusalem artichoke caused by soil salinity. Irrig. Sci. 12, 213-221 (1991).
72. 72. R. Diehl, G. Dupuis and V. Stvetoukhine, Recherches sur le topinambour. Station d'Amelioration des Plantes, ENSA, Rennes (1947).
73. 73. M. Mesken, Introduction of flowering, seed production, and evaluation of seedlings and clones of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Topinambour (Jerusalem Artichoke), Proc. First EEC Workshop on Jerusalem Artichoke, G. Grassi and G. Gosse (eds), Madrid, 30 September-1 October 1987. ECC Report EUR 11855, Luxembourg (1988).
74. 74. J. Amzile, Evolution saisonniere des matières azotees dans les tubercules de topinambour (H. tuberosus L.) et la racine de chicorée (Cichorium intybus L.). These Universite de Limoges, 119 pp. (1990).
75. 75. C. Gallard, Contribution a l'etude de la tuberisation chez le topinambour (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Memoire de D.E.A. Sciences Agronomiques, Universite Rennes I, 107 pp. (1985).
76. 76. M. Dambroth, F. Hoppner and A. Bramm, Investigations about tuber formation and tuber growth in Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Landbauforsch. Voelkenrode 42, 4, 207-215 (1992).
77. 77. O. A. Korovkin, Development rythm and morphological index for Helianthus tuberosus L. for various planting densities, Izv. Timiryazevsk. S-Kh.Akad. 2, 29-35 (1985).
78. 78. W. J. M. Meijer and E. W. J. M. Mathijssen, The relation between flower initiation and sink strength of stems and tubers of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Neth. J. agric. Sci. 39, 123-135 (1991).
79. 79. J. C. Couduroux, Dormance induite par une inhibition prolongee chez le Topinambour., C.R. Acad. Sci. Serie III. Sci. Vie 266, 480-483 (1972).
80. 80. H. L. van de Sande Bakhuyzen and H. G. Wittenrood, Factoren van bloem-en knolvorming bij topinambour (project 143). Verslag C.I.L.O over 1951, pp.135-148 (1952).
81. 81. J. P. Nitsch. Photoperiodisme et tuberisation. Bull. Soc. Fr. Physiol. Veg. 12, 233-246 (1966).
82. 82. H. G. Wittenrood, Een photoperiodisch ongevoelig jeugstadium bij topinambour. Verslag C.I.L.O over 1953, pp. 136-143 (1954).
83. 83. D. Charnay and B. M. Bongen-Ottoko, Acide abscissique et dormance chez le topinambour. I -Variations de la teneur en acide abscissique dans les tubercules d'Helianthus tuberosus au cours de la levee de dormance part le froid ou l'anoxie. Physiol. veg. 15, 3, 403-412 (1977).
84. 84. K. K. Khazhakyan, A. G. Devedzhyan and M. K. Chailakhyan, Regulation of tuber formation in Jerusalem artichoke by mean of physiological active compounds. Doklady Akad. Nauk. SSSR 248, 4, 1021-1024 (1979).
85. 85. D. Charnay and J. C. Courduroux, Relation entre l'acide abscissique endogene et la tuberisation du topinambour. Physiol. veg. 24, 6, 655-662 (1986).
86. 86. M. Kh. Chailakhyan, Hormonal regulation of reproductive development in higher plants. Biol. Plant. 27, 4/5, 292-302 (1985).
87. 87. H. L. van de Sande Bakhuyzen and H. G. Wittenrood, Bloem-,zaad-en knolvorming van topinambourrassen (project 143). Verslag C.I.L.O over 1950, pp. 154-160 (1951).
88. 88. H. Toxopeus, Improvement of planttype and biomass productivity of Helianthus tuberosus L. Final Report to the EEC, DGXII (1991).
89. 89. H. L. van de Sande Bakhuyzen and H. G. Wittenrood, Het tot bloei en zaadvorming brengen van topinambourrassen (project 143). Verslag C.I.L.O over 1949, pp. 137-144 (1950).
90. 90. K.-F. Zhao, A.-H. Zhang, S.-B. Zou and M.-L. Li, Studies on the photoperiodic responses in short-day plant Helianthus tuberosus. Acta Bot. Sin. 26, 4, 392-396 (1984).
91. 91. F. Le Cochec, Les possibilites de production de graines de topinambour, Jerusalem artichoke and other bioenergy resources, Proc. 1st Int. Conf., Korean Sc. Found., Suwon, 26-28 June 1985, Ajou University, 6 pp. (1985).
92. 92. C. Laberge and W. E. Sackston, Adaptability and diseases of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) in Quebec. Can. J. Plant Sci. 67, 1, 349-353 (1987).
93. 93. L. C. Westley, The effect of inflorescence bud removal on tuber production in Helianthus tuberosus L. (Asteraceae). Ecology 74, 1, 2136-2144 (1993).
94. 94. S. M. Strepkov, The dynamics of formation of carbohydrates in the vegetative organs of Helianthus tuberosus L. Biokhimiya 25, 2, 219-226 (1960).
95. 95. J. Edelman and T. G. Jefford, The mechanism of fructosan metabolism in higher plants as exemplified in Helianthus tuberosus. New Phytol. 67, 517-531 (1968).
96. 14C assimilates in Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus). J. Plant Physiol. 134, 218-223 (1989).
97. 97. A. Wiemken, M. Frehner, F. Keller and W. Wagner, Fructan metabolism enzymology and compartmentation. Curr. Top. Plant Biochem. Physiol. 5, 17-37 (1986).
98. 98. A. J. Koops and H. H. Jonker, Purification and characterization of the enzymes of fructan biosynthesis of Helianthus tuberosus 'Colombia' I Fructan:fructan fructosyl transferase., J. exp. Bot. 45, 280, 1623-1631 (1994).
99. 99. N. C. Carpita, F. Keller, D. M. Gibeaut, T. L. Housley and P. Matile, Synthesis of inulin oligomers in tissue slices, protoplasts and intact vacuoles of Jerusalem artichoke. J. Plant Physiol. 138, 2, 204-210 (1991).
100. 100. M. W. Shaw, K. Lodge and P. John, Modelling inulin metabolism. Inulin and inulin containing crops. Studies in Plants Science 3, 297-308 (1993).
101. 101. J. Edelman and A. G. Dickerson, The metabolism of fructose polymers in plants. Transfructosylation in tubers of Helianthus tuberosus L. Biochem. J. 98, 787-794 (1966).
102. 102. J. Edelman and T. G. Jefford, The metabolism of fructose polymers in plants. 4. Beta-fructofuranosidases of tubers of Helianthus tuberosus L. Biochem. J. 93, 148-161 (1964).
103. 103. T. G. Jefford and J. Edelman, Changes in content and composition of the fructose polymers of Helianthus tuberosus L. during growth of daughter plants. J. exp. Bot. 12, 35, 177-187 (1960).
104. 2 by illuminated shoot of Helianthus tuberosus L. with special reference to fructose polymers. C. R. Acad. Bulg. Sci. 15, 627 (1962).
105. 105. D. G. Dorrell and B. B. Chubey, Irrigation, fertilizer, harvest dates and storage effects on the reducing sugar and fructose concentrations of Jerusalem artichoke tubers. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57, 591-596 (1977).
106. 106. G. V. Ustimenko, Z. I. Usanova and O. A. Ratushenko, The role of leaves and shoots at different position on tuber formation in Jerusalem Artichoke. Izv. Timiryazevsk. S.-Kh. Akad. 3, 67-76 (1976).
107. 107. J. Barloy and E. Lemercier, Contribution a l'etude de l'evolution des glucides non structuraux chez le topinambour au cours du cycle de vegetation, Topinambour (Jerusalem artichoke), Proc. 2nd ECC Workshop on Jerusalem Artichoke, G. Gosse and G. Grassi (eds), Rennes, 6-8 December 1988, EEC Report EUR 13405, Luxembourg (1991).
108. 108. P. Denoroy, J.M. Allirand, M. Chartier and G. Gosse, Modelisation de la production de tiges et tubercules chez le topinambour. Biomass for Energy and Industry, Proc. 5th Europ. Conf., pp. 1.489-1.493, G. Gosse, G. Grassi and G. Dos Santos (eds), Lisbon, 9-13 October 1989. Elsevier, London (1990).
109. 109. J. Zubr, Performance of different Jerusalem Artichoke cultivars in Denmark (1982-1984). Topinambour (Jerusalem artichoke), Proc. 2nd ECC Workshop on Jerusalem Artichoke, G. Gosse and G. Grassi (eds), Rennes, 6-8 December 1988, EEC Report EUR 13405, Luxembourg (1991).
110. 110. S. M. MacCarter and S. J. Kays, Diseases limiting production of Jerusalem artichokes in Georgia. Plant Dis. 68, 4, 299-302 (1984).
111. 111. J. R. Conde, J. L. Tenorio, B. Rodriguez-Maribona and L. Ayerbe, Tuber yield of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) in relation to water stress. Biomass and Bioenergy 1, 3, 1-142 (1991).
112. 112. S. Schittenhelm, Productivity of Helianthus tuberosus under low versus high input conditions. Topinambour (Jerusalem artichoke), Proc. 2nd ECC Workshop on Jerusalem Artichoke, G. Gosse and G. Grassi (eds), Rennes, 6-8 December 1988, EEC Report EUR 13405, Luxembourg (1991).
113. 113. J. R. Conde, J. L. Tenorio, B. Rodriguez-Maribona, R. Lansac and L, Ayerbe, Effect of water stress on tuber and biomass productivity. Topinambour (Jerusalem Artichoke), Proc. First EEC Workshop on Jerusalem Artichoke, G. Grassi and G. Gosse (eds), Madrid, 30 September-1 October 1987, ECC Report EUR 11855, Luxembourg (1988).
114. 114. G. Soja, G. Dersch and W. Praznick, Harvest dates, fertilizer and varietal effects on yield, concentration and molecular distribution of fructan in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L,). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 165, 181-189 (1990).