Psychologists Are Open to Change, yet Wary of Rules

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 639-642

  Fuchs, Heather M ^a   Jenny, Mirjam ^b   Fiedler, Susann ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERFURT   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON COLLECTIVE GOODS   (Germany)

Author keywords

publication bias; publication practices; replication

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869026653     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1745691612459521     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Fanelli D.Do pressures to publish increase scientists' bias? An empirical support from US States Data.PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e10271.
2. Fanelli D.Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries.Scientometrics. 2011;90:891-904.
3. Fiedler K.Voodoo correlations are everywhere-Not only in neuroscience.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2011;6:163-171.
4. Francis G.Too good to be true: Publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2012;19:151-156.
5. Judgment and Decision Making. Glöckner A.Hilbig B., ed. 2011:705-881.
6. Hartshorne J. K.,Schachner A.Tracking replicability as a method of post-publication open evaluation.Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. 2012;6:1-14.
7. John L. K.,Loewenstein G.,Prelec D.Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling.Psychological Science. 2012;23:524-532.
8. Kruschke J. K.Bayesian assessment of null values via parameter estimation and model comparison.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2011;6:299-312.
9. Matthews W. J.What might judgment and decision making research be like if we took a Bayesian approach to hypothesis testing?.Judgment and Decision Making. 2011;6:843-856.
10. Nosek B.,Bar-Anan Y.Scientific Utopia: I. Opening scientific communication.Psychological Inquiry. 2012;:217-243.
11. Renkewitz F.,Fuchs H. M.,Fiedler S.Is there evidence of publication biases in JDM research?.Judgment and Decision Making. 2011;6:870-881.
12. Simmons J. P.,Nelson L. D.,Simonsohn U.False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.Psychological Science. 2011;22:1359-1366.
13. Perspectives on Psychological Science. Spellman B. A., ed. 2012:58-94.
14. Wetzels R.,Matzke D.,Lee M. D.,Rouder J. N.,Iverson G. J.,Wagenmakers E. J.Statistical evidence in experimental psychology.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2011;6:291-298.
15. Wicherts J. M.,Kievit R. A.,Bakker M.,Borsboom D.Letting the daylight in: Reviewing the reviewers and other ways to maximize transparency in science.Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. 2012;6:20.
16. Yong E.Replication studies: Bad copy.Nature. 2012;485:298-300.