Performance-based earthquake engineering: opportunities and implications for geotechnical engineering practice

Geotechnical Special Publication

Volumn , Issue 181, 2008, Pages

  Kramer, Steven L ^a  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE AREA; COLLABORATIVE EFFORTS; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; ENGINEERING PRACTITIONERS; GEOTECHNICAL; GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS; GROUND MOTIONS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; PERFORMANCE-BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; PHYSICAL DAMAGES; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE; SYSTEM RESPONSE;

CIVIL ENGINEERING; DYNAMICS; EARTHQUAKES; ENGINEERING; ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS; SOILS;

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING;

EID: 84868945927     PISSN: 08950563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1061/40975(318)213     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Algermissen, S. T. and Perkins, D. M., (1976). "A probabilistic estimate of maximum acceleration in rock in the contiguous United States," U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 76-416, 45 pp.
2. American Society of Civil Engineers (2000). "Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings," FEMA Publication 356, ASCE, Reston, Virginia.
3. Applied Technology Council (1978) "Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings," ATC 3-06, NSF 78-8, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City,
4. Applied Technology Council (1996). "Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings," ATC-40, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
5. Applied Technology Council (1997a). "NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings," FEMA Publication 273, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
6. Applied Technology Council (1997b). "NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings," FEMA Publication 274, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
7. EC 8 (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, European Norm. European Committee for Standardisation, European Committee for Standardisation Central Secretariat, rue de Stassart 36, B-1050 Brussels.
8. Applied Technology Council (1997). "Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of concrete Buildings," ATC-40, NSF 78-8, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
9. Baker, J.W. (2007). "Probabilistic structural response assessment using vector-valued intensity measures," Earthquake Eng. and Struct.l Dyn., 36, 1861-1883.
10. Bazzurro, P. and Cornell, C.A. (2002). "Vector-valued probabilistic seismic hazard analysis," Proceedings, Seventh U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts.
11. Bommer, J.J., and Abrahamson, N.A. (2006). "Why do modern probabilistic seismic-hazardanalyses often lead to increased hazard estimates?" Bull. Seismol.l Soc. of America, 96, 1,976-1,977.
12. Bray, J.D. And Travasarou, T. (2007) "Simplified Procedure For Estimating Earthquake-Induced Deviatoric Slope Displacements," J. of Geotech. Geoenv. Eng., ASCE, Vol. 133, No. 4, 381-392.
13. Burland, J.B. and Wroth, C.P. (1974). "Settlement of buildings and associated damage," Settlement of structures, British Geotech. Soc., Pentech Press, London.
14. California Department of Transportation (2003). "Contract cost data, a summary of cost by items for highway construction projects," Business, Transportation, and Housing Agency, Dept. of Transportation, State of California.
15. Conte, J.P. and Zhang, Y. (2007). "Performance Based Earthquake Engineering: Application to an Actual Bridge-Foundation-Ground System," L'Ingineria Sismica in Italia, (CD-ROM), XII Convegno ANIDIS Associazione Nazionale Italiano di Ingineria Sismica.
16. Cornell, C.A. (1968). "Engineering seismic risk analysis," Bull. Seismol.l Soc. of America, 58, 1583-1606.
17. Cornell, C.A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R.O., and Foutch, D.A. (2002). "Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines," J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 128(4), 526-533.
18. Department of Energy (1994). "Natural phenomena hazards design and evaluation criteria for Department of Energy Facilities", DOE-STD-1020-94, U. S. Dept. of Energy, Washington, D. C.
19. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2000a). "Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings." Report No. FEMA-350, SAC Joint Venture, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
20. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2000b). "Recommended seismic evaluation and upgrade criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings." Report No. FEMA-351, SAC Joint Venture, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
21. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2000c). "Recommended post-earthquake evaluation and repair criteria for welded steel moment-frame buildings." Report No. FEMA-352, SAC Joint Venture, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
22. Jalayer, F. (2003). "Direct probabilistic seismic analysis: Implementing non-linear dynamic assessments," Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 244 pp.
23. Kayen, R. E., and Mitchell, J. K., (1997). "Assessment of liquefaction potential during earthquakes by Arias intensity," J. Geotech. Geoenv. Eng., 123(12), 1162- 1174.
24. Kramer, S.L. and Mitchell, R.A. (2003). "Ground motion intensity measures for liquefaction hazard evaluation," Earthquake Spectra, 22(2), 413-438.
25. Kramer, S.L. and Mayfield, R.T. (2005). "Performance-based liquefaction hazard evaluation," Proceedings, GeoFrontiers 2005, ASCE, Austin, Texas, 18 pp.
26. Kramer, S.L., Mayfield, R.T., and Anderson, D.G. (2006). "Performance-based liquefaction hazard evaluation: Implications for codes and standards," Proceedings, Eighth U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Eng., San Francisco, Paper No. 888.
27. Kramer, S.L. and Mayfield, R.T. (2007). "The return period of liquefaction," J. Geotech. Geoenv. Eng., ASCE, Vol. 133, No. 7, pp. 1-12.
28. Kuramoto, H. (2006). "Seismic design codes for buildings in Japan," J. Disaster Res., 1(3), 341-356.
29. Luco, N. and Cornell, C. A. (1998). "Seismic drift demands for two SMRF structures with brittle connections", Structural Engineering World Wide 1998, Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, England, 1998, Paper T158-3.
30. Mackie, K.R. and Stojadinovich, B. (2006). "Fourway: Graphical tool for performance-based earthquake engineering," J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 132(8), 1274-1283,
31. Marrone, J., Ostadan, F., Youngs, R., and Litehiser, J. (2003). "Probabilistic liquefaction hazard evaluation: Method and application." Proc., 17th Int. Conf. Struct. Mech. in Reactor Tech. (SMiRT 17), Prague, Czech Republic, Paper No. M02-1.
32. Mazzoni, S, McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., and Fenves, G. L. (2006). "Open system for earthquake engineering simulation: User command language manual", Berkeley, California (http://opensees.berkeley.edu/OpenSees/ manuals/usermanual/index.html)
33. SEAOC (1959). Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary (SEAOC Blue Book), Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, California.
34. SEAOC (1995). "Vision 2000: Performance-Based Seismic Engineering of Buildings," Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, California.
35. Skempton, A.W. and MacDonald (1956). "Allowable settlement of buildings," Proc. Inst. Civ. Engrs., Pt. III, 5, 727-768.
36. Taghavi, S. and Miranda, E. (2003). "Probabilistic study of peak floor acceleration demands in linear structures," Proceedings, Appl. of Stat. and Prob. in Civil Engineering, ICASP9, Der Kiureghian, Madanat, and Pestana (eds.), Millpress, Rotterdam.
37. th World Conf. on Earthquake Eng., Vancouver, Canada, Paper No. 2326, Aug 1-6.
38. Yang, Z., Elgamal, A. and Parra E. (2003). "Computational model for cyclic mobility and associated shear deformation", J. Geotech. Geoenv. Eng., ASCE, 129 (12), 1119-1127.