Changes in Defense of an Alien Plant Ambrosia artemisiifolia before and after the Invasion of a Native Specialist Enemy Ophraella communa

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 2012, Pages

  Fukano, Yuya ^a   Yahara, Tetsukazu ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA; ARTICLE; CHRYSOMELIDAE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOLUTION OF INCREASED COMPETITIVE ABILITY HYPOTHESIS; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HYPOTHESIS; NONHUMAN; OPHRAELLA COMMUNA; PLANT DEFENSE; PLANT EVOLUTION; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT HERBIVORE INTERACTION; PLANT PARAMETERS; PLANT SEED; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPECIES INVASION;

AMBROSIA; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOSYSTEM; HERBIVORY; JAPAN; NORTH AMERICA; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA; OPHRAELLA COMMUNA;

EID: 84868709237     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049114     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Cronk QC, Fuller J (1995) Plant Invaders. The Threat to Natural Ecosystems. London: Chapman and Hall.
2. Williamson M (1996) Biological Invasions (Population and Community Biology Series). Chapman an. London: Chapman and Hall.
3. Elton CS (1958) The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. London: Methuen.
4. Keane RM, Crawley MJ, (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17: 164-170.
5. Wolfe LM, (2002) Why alien invaders succeed: support for the escape-from-enemy hypothesis. The American naturalist 160: 705-711.
6. Liu H, Stiling P, (2006) Testing the enemy release hypothesis: a review and meta-analysis. Biological Invasions 8: 1535-1545.
7. Mitchell CE, Power AG, (2003) Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421: 625-627.
8. Agrawal AA, Kotanen PM, (2003) Herbivores and the success of exotic plants: a phylogenetically controlled experiment. Ecology Letters 6: 712-715.
9. Colautti RI, Ricciardi A, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HJ, (2004) Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecology Letters 7: 721-733.
10. Liu H, Stiling P, Pemberton RW, (2007) Does enemy release matter for invasive plants? evidence from a comparison of insect herbivore damage among invasive, non-invasive and native congeners. Biological Invasions 9: 773-781.
11. van Kleunen M, Fischer M, (2009) Release from foliar and floral fungal pathogen species does not explain the geographic spread of naturalized North American plants in Europe. Journal of Ecology 97: 385-392.
12. Blossey B, Nötzold R, (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. Journal of Ecology 83: 887-889.
13. Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS, (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230: 895-899.
14. Blair AC, Wolfe LM, (2004) The evolution of an invasive plant: an experimental study with Silene latifolia. Ecology 85: 3035-3042.
15. Stastny M, Schaffner U, Elle E, (2005) Do vigour of introduced populations and escape from specialist herbivores contribute to invasiveness? Journal of Ecology 93: 27-37.
16. Buschmann H, Edwards PJ, Dietz H, (2005) Variation in growth pattern and response to slug damage among native and invasive provenances of four perennial Brassicaceae species. Journal of Ecology 93: 322-334.
17. Cripps MG, Hinz HL, McKenney JL, Price WJ, Schwarzländer M, (2009) No evidence for an "evolution of increased competitive ability" for the invasive Lepidium draba. Basic and Applied Ecology 10: 103-112.
18. Huang W, Siemann E, Wheeler GS, Zou J, Carrillo J, et al. (2010) Resource allocation to defence and growth are driven by different responses to generalist and specialist herbivory in an invasive plant. Journal of Ecology 98: 1157-1167.
19. Hull-Sanders HM, Clare R, Johnson RH, Meyer GA, (2007) Evaluation of the evolution of increased competitive ability (EICA) hypothesis: loss of defense against generalist but not specialist herbivores. Journal of Chemical Ecology 33: 781-799.
20. Müller-Schärer H, Schaffner U, Steinger T, (2004) Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19: 417-422.
21. Joshi J, Vrieling K, (2005) The enemy release and EICA hypothesis revisited: incorporating the fundamental difference between specialist and generalist herbivores. Ecology Letters 8: 704-714.
22. Doorduin LJ, Vrieling K, (2011) A review of the phytochemical support for the shifting defence hypothesis. Phytochemistry reviews: proceedings of the Phytochemical Society of Europe 10: 99-106.
23. Parker JD, Burkepile DE, Hay ME, (2006) Opposing effects of native and exotic herbivores on plant invasions. Science 311: 1459-1461.
24. Strayer DL, Eviner VT, Jeschke JM, Pace ML, (2006) Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends in ecology & evolution 21: 645-651.
25. Julien MH, Griffiths MW (1998) Biological control of weeds: a world catalogue of agents and their target weeds. ed. 4. Wallingford, UK: 4CABI Publishing. p.
26. Siemann E, Rogers WE, (2003) Increased competitive ability of an invasive tree may be limited by an invasive beetle. Ecological Applications 13: 1503-1507.
27. Zangerl AR, Stanley MC, Berenbaum MR, (2008) Selection for chemical trait remixing in an invasive weed after reassociation with a coevolved specialist. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 4547-4552.
28. Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR, (2005) Increase in toxicity of an invasive weed after reassociation with its coevolved herbivore. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 15529-15532.
29. Hisauchi K (1950) Naturalized plants. Tokyo: Kagakutosyo syuppan. p.
30. Bassett IJ, Crompton CW, (1975) The biology of canadian weeds: 11. Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. and A. psilostachya DC. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 55: 463-476.
31. Futuyma DJ, (1990) Observations on the Taxonomy and Natural History of Ophraella Wilcox (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), with a Description of a New Species. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 98: 163-186.
32. MacKay J, Kotanen PM, (2008) Local escape of an invasive plant, common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.), from above-ground and below-ground enemies in its native area. Journal of Ecology 96: 1152-1161.
33. MacDonald AAM, Kotanen PM, (2010) The effects of disturbance and enemy exclusion on performance of an invasive species, common ragweed, in its native range. Oecologia 162: 977-986.
34. Takizawa H, Saito A, Saito K, Hirano Y, Ohno M, (1999) Invading insect, Ophraella communa LeSage, 1986: range expansion and life history in Kanto district, Japan. Gekkan-Mushi 338: 26-31.
35. Yamazaki K, Imai C, Natuhara Y, (2000) Rapid population growth and food-plant exploitation pattern in an exotic leaf beetle, Ophraella communa LeSage (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), in western Japan.pdf. Applied Entomology and Zoology 35: 215-223.
36. Moriya S, Shiyake S, (2001) Spreading the distribution of an exotic ragweed beetle, Ophraella communa LeSage. Japanese Journal of Entomology 4: 99-102.
37. Moloney KA, Holzapfel C, Tielbörger K, Jeltsch F, Schurr FM, (2009) Rethinking the common garden in invasion research. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 11: 311-320.
38. Hodgins KA, Rieseberg L, (2011) Genetic differentiation in life-history traits of introduced and native common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) populations. Journal of evolutionary biology 24: 2731-2749.
39. Franks SJ, (2009) Genetics, Evolution, and Conservation of Island Plants. Journal of Plant Biology 53: 1-9.
40. Kato A, Ohbayashi N, (2008) Insect communities associated with an invasive plant, the common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L., in western Japan. Japanese Journal of Environmental Entomology 19: 125-132.
41. Genton BJ, Kotanen PM, Cheptou PO, Adolphe C, Shykoff JA, (2005) Enemy release but no evolutionary loss of defence in a plant invasion: an inter-continental reciprocal transplant experiment. Oecologia 146: 404-414.
42. Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers WE, Siemann E, et al. (2005) Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144: 1-11.
43. Dietz H, Edwards PJ, (2006) Recognition that causal processes change during plant invasion helps explain conflicts in evidence. Ecology 87: 1359-1367.
44. Atwood J, Meyerson L, (2011) Beyond EICA: understanding post-establishment evolution requires a broader evaluation of potential selection pressures. NeoBiota 10: 7.
45. Hendry AP, Kinnison MT, (1999) Perspective: The Pace of Modern Life: Measuring Rates of Contemporary Microevolution. Evolution 1999: 6.
46. Stockwell CA, Hendry AP, Kinnison MT, (2003) Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 94-101.
47. Maron J, Vilà M (2008) Exotic plants in an altered enemy landscape: effects on enemy resistance. In: Specialization, speciation and radiation. In: Kelley J, Tilmon J, editors. Specialization, speciation, and radiation: the evolutionary biology of herbivorous insects. California: University of California Press. 280-295.
48. Orians CM, Ward D, (2010) Evolution of plant defenses in nonindigenous environments. Annual review of entomology 55: 439-459.
49. Franks SJ, Avise JC, Bradshaw WE, Conner JK, Etterson JR, et al. (2008) The Resurrection Initiative: Storing Ancestral Genotypes to Capture Evolution in Action. BioScience 58: 870.
50. Gaudeul M, Giraud T, Kiss L, Shykoff JA, (2011) Nuclear and chloroplast microsatellites show multiple introductions in the worldwide invasion history of common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia. PloS one 6: e17658.
51. Meggs WJ, Dunn KA, Bloch RM, Goodman PE, Davidoff AL, (1996) Prevalence and nature of allergy and chemical sensitivity in a general population. Archives of environmental health 51: 275-282.
52. Palmer WA, Goeden RD, (1991) The Host Range of Ophraella communa Lesage (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin 45: 115-120.
53. Kiss L (2007) Why is biological control of common ragweed, the most allergenic weed in Eastern Europe, still only a hope? In: Vincent C, Goettel M, G L, editors. Biological control: a global perspective.Wallingford: CABI. 80-91.
54. R Development Core Team (2010) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna Austria.