Learning preference models from data: on the problem of label ranking and its variants

CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, Courses and Lectures

Volumn 504, Issue , 2008, Pages 283-304

  Hüllermeier, Eyke ^a   Fürnkranz, Johannes ^b  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^b DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868707122     PISSN: 02541971     EISSN: 23093706     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-211-85432-7_12     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. C. Alonso, JJ. Rodríguez, and B. Pulido. Enhancing consistency based diagnosis with machine learning techniques. In: Proc. 10th Conference of the Spanish Association for Artificial Intelligence, pages 312-321. Springer, 2004.
2. William W. Cohen, Robert E. Schapire, and Yoram Singer. Learning to order things. In Michael I. Jordan, Michael J. Kearns, and Sara A. Solla, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. The MIT Press, 1998.
3. Jon Doyle. Prospects for preferences. In Computational Intelligence, volume 20, Pages 111-136, 2004.
4. J. Fodor and M. Roubens. Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994.MATH
5. J. Fürnkranz. Round robin classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2: 721-747, 2002.
6. J. Fürnkranz and E. Hüllermeier. Pairwise preference learning and ranking. In Proc. ECML-2003, 13th European Conference on Machine Learning, Cavtat-Dubrovnik, Croatia, September 2003.
7. P. Haddawy, V. Ha, A. Restificar, B. Geisler, and J. Miyamoto. Preference elicitation via theory refinement. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 4: 317-337, 2003.
8. S. Har-Peled, D. Roth, and D. Zimak. Constraint classification: a new approach to multiclass classification. In: Proceedings 13th Int. Conf. on Algorithmic Learning Theory, pages 365-379, Lübeck, Germany, 2002. Springer.
9. Sariel Har-Peled, Dan Roth, and Dav Zimak. Constraint classification for multiclass classification and ranking. In Suzanna Becker, Sebastian Thrun, and Klaus Obermayer, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15 (NIPS-02) pages 785-792, 2003.
10. R. Herbrich, T. Graepel, P. Bollmann-Sdorra, and K. Obermayer. Supervised learning of preference relations. In Proceedings FGML-98, German National Workshop on Machine Learning, pages 43-47, 1998.
11. E. Hüllermeier and J. Fürnkranz. Comparison of ranking procedures in pairwise preference learning. In Proc. IPMU-04, Perugia, Italy, 2004.
12. Eyke Hüllermeier and Johannes Fürnkranz. Learning label preferences: Ranking error versus position error In Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis VI, Madrid, 2005, Springer.
13. T. Joachims. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-02) pages 133-142. ACM Press, 2002.
14. T. Joachims, L. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, and G. Gay. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR-05) 2005.
15. Dorian Pyle. Data Preparation for Data Mining. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 1999.
16. F. Radlinski and T. Joachims. Learning to rank from implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-05) 2005.
17. Gerald Tesauro. Connectionist learning of expert preferences by comparison training. In D. Touretzky, editor, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 1 (NIPS-88), pages 99-106. Morgan Kaufmann, 1989.
18. J. Wang. Artificial neural networks versus natural neural networks: a connectionist paradigm for preference assessment. Decision Support Systems, 11: 415-429, 1994.
19. TF. Wu, CJ. Lin, and RC. Weng. Probability estimates for multi-class classification by pairwise coupling. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5: 975-1005, 2004.