An unwelcome user? or how to negotiate the use of a risky space

Journal of Risk Research

Volumn 15, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1261-1279

  Flanquart, Hervé ^a,b  

^a MRSH   (France)

^b MESHS   (France)

Author keywords

constructionist approach; danger; industry; maritime port; risk

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTIONIST APPROACH; DANGER; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; INDUSTRIAL SITES; LEISURE ACTIVITIES; LOCAL AUTHORITIES; MAJOR INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS; MARITIME PORT; SANDY BEACH;

ACCIDENTS; INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE; INDUSTRY; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; PORTS AND HARBORS; RISKS;

RISK PERCEPTION;

EID: 84868699314     PISSN: 13669877     EISSN: 14664461     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2011.609316     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Beck, U. 1992. World risk society, Cambridge: Polity Press.
2. Boghossian, P. 2006. Fear of knowledge. Against relativism and constructivism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Chateauraynaud, F., and Torny, D. 2005. Les sombres précurseurs. Une sociologie pragmatique de l'alerte et du risque [Sombre precursors. A pragmatic sociology of warning and risk]. Paris: Editions de l'EHESS.
4. Douglas, M. 1992. Risk and blame. Essays in cultural theory, London: Routledge.
5. Douglas, M., and, Wildavski, A. 1984. Risk and culture. An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
6. Elias, N. 1982. The civilizing process: State formation and civilization, Malden: Blackwell.
7. Elias, N. 1994. The civilizing process: The history of manners and state formation and civilization, Malden: Blackwell.
8. Ewald, F. 1986. L'Etat providence [The Welfare State]. Paris: Grasset.
9. Festinger, L. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
10. Flanquart, H., A.-P. Hellequin, and P. Vallet. 2007a. Faire ou ne pas faire confiance aux gestionnaires du risque? Le cas dun village entouré de sites Seveso [Risk managers: Do we trust them or not? The case of a village surrounded by Seveso sites]. Territoires en mouvement 1: 70-82.
11. Flanquart, H, Hellequin, A.-P, and, Vallet, P. Petits arrangements avec la peur: se souvenir ou pas des accidents industriels dans un village entouré dusines Seveso [Coming to terms with fear: Remembering or not industrial accidents in a village surrounded by Seveso sites]. Paper presented at Colloque Risques Industriels majeurs. Sciences Humaines et sociales. December 6-7 2007b. France: Université de Toulouse III.
12. Ford, B.J. 1996. BSE. The facts, London: Corgi.
13. Foucault, M. 1991. Governmentality. In The Foucault effect, Edited by: Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. 87-104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Giddens, A. 1990. The consequences of modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
15. Gilbert, C. 2003. La fabrique des risques [The risks factory]. Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie 114, 55-72.
16. Gjernes, T. 2008. Perception of risk and uncertainty among Sámi women involved in reindeer herding in Northern Norway. Health, Risk & Society, 10: 505-516.
17. Latour, B. 1995. We have never been modern, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Le Blanc, A., S. Frère Séverine, A.-P. Hellequin, H. Flanquart, F. Gonthier, and I. Calvo-Mendieta. 2009. Le jeu de la concertation autour des sites Seveso: une analyse des dispositifs de gouvernance locale dans lagglomération dunkerquoise [The interplay of consultation surrounding classified Seveso sites: An analysis of the local government systems in Dunkirk area]. Vertigo special issue 6.
19. Luhmann, N. 1993. Risk: A sociological theory, Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.
20. Lupton, D. 1999a. Risk, London: Routledge.
21. Lupton, D. 1999b. Introduction: Risk and sociocultural theory. In Risk and sociocultural theory, Edited by: Lupton, D. 1-11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Parkhill, K.A., Pidgeon, N.F., Henwood, K.L., Simmons, P., and, Venables, D. 2009. From the familiar to the extraordinary: Local residents perceptions of risk when living with nuclear power in the UK. Royal Geographical Society, Journal Compilation,: 39-58.
23. Peretti-Watel, P. 2003. Sociologie du risque [Risk sociology]. Paris: Armand Colin. Philips of Worth Matravers
24. Nicholas, J. Bridgeman, and, Ferguson-Smith, M. 2000. The BSE inquiry. House of commons, London: HMSO.
25. Piattelli Palmarini, M. 1995. La réforme du jugement ou comment ne plus se tromper [The reform of assessment or how to avoid making mistakes]. Paris: Odile Jacob.
26. Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R., and, Slovic, P. 2003. The social amplification of risk, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Pollak, M. 1988. Les homosexuels et le sida. Sociologie d'une épidémie [Homosexuals and AIDS. Sociology of an epidemic]. Paris: Métailié.
28. Renn, O. 2008. An ethical appraisal of hormesis: Toward a rational discourse on acceptability of risks and benefits. Human & Experimental Toxicology, 27: 627-642. (Pubitemid 352764066)
29. Renn, O., Klinke, A., and, van Asselt, M. 2011. Coping with complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: A synthesis. AMBIO, 40: 231-246.
30. Rorty, R. 1998. Truth and progress Vol. 3, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Setbon, M. 2000. La normalisation paradoxale du sida [The paradoxical normalization of AIDS]. Revue Franaise de Sociologie 41: 61-78.
32. Sica, A. 1984. Sociogenesis versus psychogenesis: The unique sociology of Norbert Elias. Mid-American Review of Sociology, 9: 49-78.
33. Schnapper, D. 1999. La compréhension sociologique: Démarche de l'analyse typologique[Sociological interpretation], Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
34. Souques, M. 2009. Faut-il avoir peur des champs é lectromagnétiques liés l'électricité? [Should we be afraid of electromagnetic fields generated by electricity?]. Scince et pseudo-scinces 285, 32-40.
35. Suraud, M.-G. 2007. La catastrophe d'AZF De la concertation la contestation [The AZF catastrophe. From consultation to protest]. Paris: La documentation franaise.
36. Taylor-Gooby, P., and, Zinn, J.O. 2006. Current directions in risk research: New developments in psychology and sociology. Risk Analysis, 26: 397-411.
37. Teuber, A. 1990. Justifying risk. Daedalus, Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 119: 237-251.
38. Tulloch, J., and, Lupton, D. 2003. Risk and every day life, London: Sage.
39. Weber, M. 1965. Essais sur la théorie des sciences [Essays on the theory of science]. Paris: Plon.
40. Wynne, B. 1996. May the sheep safety graze?. In Risk, environment and modernity, Edited by: Lash, S., Szerszinski, B. and Wynne, B. 44-83. London: Sage.