Identifying specific non-attending groups in breast cancer screening - population-based registry study of participation and socio-demography

BMC Cancer

Volumn 12, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Jensen, Line F ^a   Pedersen, Anette F ^a   Andersen, Berit ^b   Vedsted, Peter ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b RANDERS REGIONAL HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Inequality; Mammography; Non participation; Screening; Socio demography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BREAST CANCER; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HUMAN; IMMIGRANT; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MISCELLANEOUS NAMED GROUPS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; SCREENING SITE DISTANCE; SINGLE WOMAN; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL STATUS; TENANT; UNEMPLOYMENT;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DENMARK; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; REGISTRIES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84868693135     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712407     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-518     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Nystrom L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjold B, Rutqvist LE. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 2002, 359:909-919. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08020-0, 11918907.
2. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002, 137:347-360.
3. Olsen O, Gotzsche PC. Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 2001, 358:1340-1342. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06449-2, 11684218.
4. Vejborg I, Mikkelsen E, Garne JP, Bak M, Lernevall A, Mogensen NB, Schwartz W, Lynge E. Mammography screening in Denmark. Dan Med Bull 2011, 58:C4287.
5. Zackrisson S, Andersson I, Manjer J, Janzon L. Non-attendance in breast cancer screening is associated with unfavourable socio-economic circumstances and advanced carcinoma. Int J Cancer 2004, 108:754-760. 10.1002/ijc.11622, 14696103.
6. Lagerlund M, Maxwell AE, Bastani R, Thurfjell E, Ekbom A, Lambe M. Sociodemographic predictors of non-attendance at invitational mammography screening-a population-based register study (Sweden). Cancer Causes Control 2002, 13:73-82. 10.1023/A:1013978421073, 11899121.
7. von Euler-Chelpin M, Olsen AH, Njor S, Vejborg I, Schwartz W, Lynge E. Socio-demographic determinants of participation in mammography screening. Int J Cancer 2008, 122:418-423. 10.1002/ijc.23089, 17893881.
8. Bulliard JL, de Landtsheer JP, Levi F. Profile of women not attending in the Swiss Mammography Screening Pilot Programme. Breast 2004, 13:284-289. 10.1016/j.breast.2004.03.001, 15325662.
9. Aro AR, De Koning HJ, Absetz P, Schreck M. Psychosocial predictors of first attendance for organised mammography screening. J Med Screen 1999, 6:82-88.
10. Maxwell CJ, Bancej CM, Snider J. Predictors of mammography use among Canadian women aged 50-69: findings from the 1996/97 National Population Health Survey. CMAJ 2001, 164:329-334. 80725, 11232132.
11. Luengo-Matos S, Polo-Santos M, Saz-Parkinson Z. Mammography use and factors associated with its use after the introduction of breast cancer screening programmes in Spain. Eur J Cancer Prev 2006, 15:242-248. 10.1097/01.cej.0000199503.30818.e6, 16679867.
12. Coughlin SS, Leadbetter S, Richards T, Sabatino SA. Contextual analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening and factors associated with health care access among United States women, 2002. Soc Sci Med 2008, 66:260-275. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.09.009, 18022299.
13. Bare ML, Montes J, Florensa R, Sentis M, Donoso L. Factors related to non-participation in a population-based breast cancer screening programme. Eur J Cancer Prev 2003, 12:487-494. 10.1097/00008469-200312000-00007, 14639126.
14. Engelman KK, Hawley DB, Gazaway R, Mosier MC, Ahluwalia JS, Ellerbeck EF. Impact of geographic barriers on the utilization of mammograms by older rural women. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002, 50:62-68. 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50009.x, 12028248.
15. Jackson MC, Davis WW, Waldron W, McNeel TS, Pfeiffer R, Breen N. Impact of geography on mammography use in California. Cancer Causes Control 2009, 20:1339-1353. 10.1007/s10552-009-9355-6, 19449107.
16. Coughlin SS, King J. Breast and cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by county-level commuting time to work and use of public transportation, 2004 and 2006. BMC Publ Health 2010, 10:146.
17. Aro AR, De Koning HJ, Absetz P, Schreck M. Two distinct groups of non-attenders in an organized mammography screening program. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001, 70:145-153. 10.1023/A:1012939228916, 11768605.
18. Kjellen M, von Euler-Chelpin M. Socioeconomic status as determinant for participation in mammography screening: assessing the difference between using women's own versus their partner's. Int J Public Health 2010, 55:209-215. 10.1007/s00038-010-0137-4, 20340039.
19. Coleman MP, Forman D, Bryant H, Butler J, Rachet B, Maringe C, Nur U, Tracey E, Coory M, Hatcher J, et al. Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995-2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet 2011, 377:127-138. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62231-3, 3018568, 21183212.
20. Timmermans B. The Danish Integrated Database for Labor Market Research: Towards Demystification for the English Speaking Audience 2010, Aalborg.
21. Statistics Denmark Projections on immigrants and decendants http://www.dst.dk/en/Statistik/dokumentation/Declarations/projections-of-immigrants-and-descendants.aspx, Statistics Denmark.
22. OECD Project on Income Distribution and Poverty What are equivalence scales? http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/52/35411111.pdf, OECD Project on Income Distribution and Poverty.
23. Gjerstorff ML. The Danish Cancer Registry. Scand J Public Health 2011, 39:42-45. 10.1177/1403494810393562, 21775350.
24. Esri ArcGIS Network Analyst http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/extensions/networkanalyst/index.html, Esri.
25. Vedsted P, Olesen F, Hollnagel H, Bro F, Kamper-Jørgensen F. General practice in Denmark [In Danish] 2005, TPL, Copenhagen.
26. Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol 2004, 159:702-706. 10.1093/aje/kwh090, 15033648.
27. Barros AJ, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003, 3:21. 10.1186/1471-2288-3-21, 521200, 14567763.
28. Wetherill GB, Duncombe P, Kenward M. Regression Analysis with Applications 1986, Capman and Hall, London.
29. Donner A, Klar N. Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomisation Trials in Health Research 2000, Hodder Arnold, London.
30. Pedersen CB. The Danish Civil Registration System. Scand J Public Health 2011, 39:22-25. 10.1177/1403494810387965, 21775345.
31. Rahman S, Price JH, Dignan M, Rahman S, Lindquist PS, Jordan TR. Access to Mammography Facilities and Detection of Breast Cancer by Screening Mammography: A GIS Approach. Int J Canc Prev 2009, 2:403-413. 2902003, 20628557.
32. Lagerlund M, Sparen P, Thurfjell E, Ekbom A, Lambe M. Predictors of non-attendance in a population-based mammography screening programme; socio-demographic factors and aspects of health behaviour. Eur J Cancer Prev 2000, 9:25-33. 10.1097/00008469-200002000-00004, 10777007.
33. Lagerlund M, Hedin A, Sparen P, Thurfjell E, Lambe M. Attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge as predictors of nonattendance in a Swedish population-based mammography screening program. Prev Med 2000, 31:417-428. 10.1006/pmed.2000.0723, 11006068.
34. Von WC, Good A, Whitaker KL, Wardle J. Psychosocial determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation: a conceptual framework. Epidemiol Rev 2011, 33:135-147. 10.1093/epirev/mxq018, 21586673.
35. Jensen A, Olsen AH, von Euler-Chelpin M, Helle NS, Vejborg I, Lynge E. Do nonattenders in mammography screening programmes seek mammography elsewhere?. Int J Cancer 2005, 113:464-470. 10.1002/ijc.20604, 15455383.
36. Simou E, Foundoulakis E, Kourlaba G, Maniadakis N. Factors associated with the use of preventive services by women in Greece. Eur J Public Health 2011, 21:512-519. 10.1093/eurpub/ckq103, 20656691.
37. Wang JH, Mandelblatt JS, Liang W, Yi B, Ma IJ, Schwartz MD. Knowledge, cultural, and attitudinal barriers to mammography screening among nonadherent immigrant Chinese women: ever versus never screened status. Cancer 2009, 115:4828-4838. 10.1002/cncr.24517, 2761518, 19645031.
38. Liang W, Wang J, Chen MY, Feng S, Yi B, Mandelblatt JS. Cultural views, language ability, and mammography use in Chinese American women. Health Educ Behav 2009, 36:1012-1025. 10.1177/1090198109331669, 19233947.