Socioeconomic status as determinant for participation in mammography screening: Assessing the difference between using women's own versus their partner's

International Journal of Public Health

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 209-215

  Kjellén, Malin ^a   Von Euler Chelpin, My ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Mammography; Mass screening; Participation; Socioeconomic status

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; DENMARK; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; RISK; SOCIAL CLASS; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DENMARK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; SOCIAL CLASS;

EID: 77955891563     PISSN: 16618556     EISSN: 1420911X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00038-010-0137-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Banks E, Beral V, Cameron R, Hogg A, Langley N, Barnes I, Bull D, Reeves G, English R, Taylor S, Elliman J, Harris CL (2002) Comparison of various characteristics of women who do and do not attend for breast cancer screening. Breast Cancer Res 4:R1
2. Baré ML, Montes J, Florensa R, Sentis M, Donoso L (2003) Factors related to non-participation in a population-based breast cancer screening programme. Eur J Cancer Prev 12:487-494
3. Blackwell DL, Martinez ME, Gentleman JF (2008) Women's compliance with public health guidelines for mammograms and pap tests in Canada and the United States: an analysis of data from the Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health. Womens Health Issues 18:85-99
4. Calle EE, Flanders WD, Thun MJ, Martin LM (1993) Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in US women. Am J Public Health 83:53-60
5. Dailey AB, Kasl SV, Holford TR, Calvocoressi L, Jones BA (2007) Neighborhood-level socioeconomic predictors of nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:2293-2303
6. Denmark in figures (2008) http://www.dst.dk/homeuk/statistics/ofs/ Publications/dod.aspx. Accessed 18 Nov 2008
7. European Commission (2006) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 4th edn. European Communities
8. ILO (1983) Bulletin of Labour Statistics, 1983:3. Geneva
9. Jensen A, Olsen AH, von Euler-Chelpin M, Njor SH, Vejborg I, Lynge E (2005) Do nonattenders in mammography screening programmes seek mammography elsewhere? Int J Cancer 113:464-470
10. Katz SJ, Zemencuk JK, Hofer TP (2000) Breast cancer screening in the United States and Canada, 1994: socioeconomic gradients persist. Am J Public Health 90:799-803
11. Krieger N (1991) Women and social class: a methodological study comparing individual, household, and census measures as predictors of black/white differences in reproductive history. J Epidemiol Community Health 45:35-42
12. Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE (1997) Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health 18:341-378
13. Krieger N, Chen JT, Selby JV (1999) Comparing individual-based and household-based measures of social class to assess class inequalities in women's health: a methodological study of 684 US women. J Epidemiol Community Health 53:612-623
14. Lagerlund M, Sparén P, Thurfjell E, Ekbom A, Lambe M (2000) Predictors of non-attendance in a population-based mammography screening programme: socio-demographic factors and aspects of health behaviour. Eur J Cancer Prev 9:25-33
15. Lagerlund M, Maxwell AE, Bastani R, Thurfjell E, Ekbom A, Lamble M (2002) Sociodemographic predictors of non-attendance at invitational mammography screening-a population based register study (Sweden). Cancer Causes Control 13:73-82
16. Luengo-Matos S, Polo-Santos M, Saz-Parkinson Z (2006) Mammography use and factors associated with its use after the introduction of breast cancer screening programmes in Spain. Eur J Cancer Prev 15:242-248
17. Maheswaran R, Pearson T, Jordan H, Black D (2006) Socioeconomic deprivation, travel distance, location of service, and uptake of breast cancer screening in North Derbyshire, UK. J Epidemiol Community Health 60:208-212
18. Nyström L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjöld B, Rutqvist L-E (2002) Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 359:909-919
19. Office for National Statistics (2009) http://www.ons.gov.uk/ aboutstatistics/classifications/current/ns-sec/household-level/index.html. Accessed 17 March 2009
20. Olsen AH, Njor SH, Vejborg I, Schwartz W, Dalgaard P, Jensen MB, Brix Tange U, Blichert-Toft M, Rank F, Mouridsen H, Lynge E (2005) Breast cancer mortality in Copenhagen after introduction of mammography screening: cohort study. BMJ 330:220
21. Osler M, Prescott E, Gronbaek M, Christensen U, Due P, Engholm G (2002) Income inequality, individual income, and mortality in Danish adults: analysis of pooled data from two cohort studies. BMJ 324:13-16
22. Paci E, Ponti A, Zappa M, Patriarca S, Falini P, Delmastro G, Bianchi S, Sapino A, Vezzosi V, Senore C, Crocetti E, Frigerio A, Zanetti R, Roselli del Turco M, Segnan N (2005) Early diagnosis, not differential treatment, explains better survival in service screening. Eur J Cancer 41:2728-2734
23. Parvinen I, Helenius H, Pylkkänen L, Anttila A, Immonen- Räihä P, Kauhava L, Räsänen O, Klemi PJ (2006) Service screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality among elderly women in Turku. J Med Screen 13:34-40
24. Statistics Denmark (2008a) http://www.dst.dk/HomeUK/Guide/ documentation/Varedeklarationer/emnegruppe/emne.aspx?sysrid=000848. Accessed 3 Oct 2008
25. Statistics Denmark (2008b) http://www.dst.dk/publikation.aspx?cid= 4799. Accessed 3 Oct 2008
26. Tabar L, Yen MF, Vitak B, Chen HHT, Smith RA, Duffy SW (2003) Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. Lancet 361:1405-1410
27. Törnberg S, Kemetli L, Svane G, Rosén M, Stenbeck M, Nyström L (2005) Pattern of participation in a cohort aged 50-60 years at first invitation to the service-screening programme with mammography in Stockholm county, Sweden. Prev Med 41:728-733
28. van der Pol M, Cairns J (2001) Assessing the resource implications of extending routine invitation to breast screening to women aged 65-67 years. Eur J Cancer 37:1790-1796
29. von Euler-Chelpin M, Olsen AH, Njor S, Vejborg I, Schwartz W, Lynge E (2006) Women's patterns of participation in mammography screening in Denmark. Eur J Epidemiol 21:203-209
30. von Euler-Chelpin M, Olsen AH, Njor S, Vejborg I, Schwartz W, Lynge E (2008) Socio-demographic determinants of participation in mammography screening. Int J Cancer 122:418-423
31. Willis K (2008) "I come because I am called": recruitment and participation in mammography screening in Uppsala, Sweden. Health Care Women Int 29:135-150
32. Zackrisson S, Andersson I, Manjer J, Janzon L (2004) Non-attendance in breast cancer screening is associated with unfavourable socioeconomic circumstances and advanced carcinoma. Int J Cancer 108:754-760
33. Zackrisson S, Lindstrom M, Moghaddassi M, Andersson I, Janzon L (2007) Social predictors of non-attendance in an urban mammographic screening programme: a multilevel analysis. Scand J Public Health 35:548-554