Innovation and Development: The Evidence From Innovation Surveys

Latin American Business Review

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 219-261

  Bogliacino, Francesco ^a   Perani, Giulio ^b   Pianta, Mario ^c   Supino, Stefano ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b ITALIAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STATISTICS   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF URBINO   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CASSINO AND SOUTHERN LAZIO   (Italy)

Author keywords

emerging countries; innovation surveys; patterns of innovation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868679192     PISSN: 10978526     EISSN: 15286932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10978526.2012.730023     Document Type: Review

References (131)

1. Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching-up, forging ahead and falling behind. Journal of Economic History, 46 (2), 385-406.
2. Aghion, P., Harmgart, H., and Weisshaar, N. (2009). A country tailored approach to growth policy implications for new member states [Working Paper INCOM 22.1.-23.1]. Presented at Innovation for Competitiveness Conference for Research on Innovation, Research and Development, Prague, Czech Republic.
3. Aghion, P., and Howitt, P. (2006). Appropriate growth policy: A unifying framework. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4 (2-3), 269-314.
4. Alcorta, L., Urem, B., and Tongliang, A. (2008). Do manufacturing firms in China innovate? Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38 (4), 560-590.
5. Altenburg, T., Schmitz, H., and Stamm, A. (2008). Breakthrough? China's and India's transition from production to innovation. World Development, 36 (2), 325-344.
6. Alvarez, R. (2001). External sources of technological innovation in Chilean manufacturing industry. Estudios de Economía, 28 (1), 53-68.
7. Amsden, A. H., and Mourshed, M. (1997). Scientific publications, patents and technological capabilities in late-industrializing countries. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 9(3), 343-359.
8. Anlló, G. (2003). La medición de la innovación en América Latina: ¿porqué el manual de Oslo no es suficiente?. (Tesis de Maestría). Instituto de Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia y la Technología, Universidad Nacional de Quilmés, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
9. Anlló, G. (2006). An overview of Latin America innovation surveys. In Blankley, W., Scerre, M., Molotja, N., & Saloojee, I. (Eds.). Measuring innovation in OECD and non-OECD countries (Chap. 10, pp. 141-162). Cape Town, South Africa: HSRC Press.
10. Antonelli, C., Barbiellini, F. A., Giannetti, R., Gomellini, M., Pastorelli, S., and Pianta, M. (2007). Innovazione tecnologica e sviluppo industriale nel secondo dopoguerra (pp. 359-594). Bari, Italy: Laterza.
11. Aralica, Z., Raĉić, D., and Radić, D. (2008). Innovation propensity in Croatian enterprises: results of the community innovation survey. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 3 (1), 77-88.
12. Archibugi, D., and Coco, A. (2004). A new indicator of technological capabilities for developed and developing countries (ArCo). World Development, 32 (4), 629-654.
13. Archibugi, D., Denni, M., and Filippetti, A. (2009). The technological capabilities of nations: The state of the art of synthetic indicators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76 (7), 917-931.
14. Archibugi, D., and Michie, J. (1997). Technology, globalisation and economic performance (pp. 83-137). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15. Archibugi, D., and Pianta, M. (1996). Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation, 16 (9), 451-468.
16. Arvanitis, R., and Mhenni, H. (2008). Innovation policies in the context of North Africa: New trends in Morocco and Tunisia [Working Paper MPRA n°17939]. University Library of Munich, Munich, Germany.
17. Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (2010). ASEANstats. Retrieved from http://www.aseansec.org/22122.htm
18. Ayadi, M., Rahmouni, M., and Yildizoĝlu, M. (2007). Les modèles sectoriels d'innovations dans un pays en développement: le cas de la Tunisie [Cahiers du GREThA No. 2007-19]. Groupe de Recherche en Économie Théorique et Apliquée, Bordeaux IV, France. Retrieved from http://gretha.u-bordeaux4.fr/cahier-2007-19-les-modeles
19. Ayadi, M., Rahmouni, M., and Yildizoĝlu, M. (2009). Determinants of the innovation propensity in Tunisia: The central role of external knowledge sources [Document de Travail GREQAM No. 2009-05]. Groupement de Recherche en Économie Quantitative d'Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France. Retrieved fromhttp://hal.archivesouvertes.fr/index.php?halsid=aj8rfp9jdnt8n2nuro5k9k6r34&view_this_doc=halshs-00368560&version=1
20. Bell, M., and Pavitt, K. (1993). Technological accumulation and industrial growth: Contrasts between developed and developing countries. Industrial & Corporate Change, 2 (2), 157-210.
21. Benavente, J. M. (2005a). Investigación y desarrollo, innovación y productividad: Un análisis econométrico a nivel de la firma. Estudios de Economía, 32(1), 39-67.
22. Benavente, J. M. (2005b). Innovación tecnológica en Chile: Donde estamos y qué se puede hacer. Revista Economía, 8 (1), 53-74.
23. Benavente, J. M. (2006). The role of research and innovation in promoting productivity in Chile. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15 (4-5), 301-315.
24. Benavente, J.-M., Mello, L., and Mulder, N. (2005). Fostering innovation in Chile [Working Paper OECD n°454]. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France. Retrieved fromhttp://search.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?doclanguage=en&cote=eco/wkp%282005%2941
25. Blankley, W., and Kaplan, D. (2006). South Africa's first survey of innovation in the manufacturing sector and recommendations for the next survey. In Blankley, W., Scerri, M., Molotja, N., & Saloojee, I. (Eds.). Measuring innovation in OECD and non-OECD countries: Selected seminar papers (pp. 217-226). Cape Town, South Africa: HSRC Press.
26. Blankley, W., and Moses, C. (2009). Main results of the South African innovation survey 2005, a survey undertaken on behalf of DST by CeSTII. Cape Town, South Africa: HSRC Press.
27. Blankley, W., Scerri, M., Molotia, N., and Saloojee, I. (2006). Measuring innovation in OECD and non-OECD countries. Cape Town, South Africa: HSRC Press.
28. Bogliacino, F., and Naranjo, A. J. (2008). Optimal intellectual property rights protection: The case of Colombia. Economics Bulletin, 15 (20), 1-15.
29. Castellani, D., and Zanfei, A. (2006). Multinational firms, innovation and productivity. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
30. Chadha, A. (2009). Product cycles, innovation, and exports: A study of Indian pharmaceuticals. World Development, 37 (9), 1478-1483.
31. Chaminade, C., Intarakumnerd, P., and Sapprasert, K. (2008). Measuring systemic failures in innovation systems in developing countries using innovation survey data: The case of Thailand [Mimeo]. Lund, Sweden: Lund University.
32. Chang, H.-J. (2001). Intellectual property rights and economic development: Historical lessons and emerging issues. Journal of Human Development, 2 (2), 287-309.
33. Chudnovsky, D., López, A., and Pupato, G. (2006). Innovation and productivity in developing countries: A study of Argentine manufacturing firms' behavior (1992-2001). Research Policy, 35 (2), 266-288.
34. Cimoli, M., Dosi, G., and Stiglitz, J. E. (Eds.). (2009). Industrial policy and development: The political economy of capabilities accumulation (Series The initiative for policy dialogues series). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
35. Correa, A. O. (2005). Intensidad innovadora, permanencia exportadora, y destino de las exportaciones: análisis para una muestra de empresas de Cali. Economía, Gestión y Desarrollo, 3, 9-20. Retrieved fromhttp://revistaeconomia.puj.edu.co/html/articulos/Numero_3/2.pdf
36. Costa, I., and S. Robles, R. Q. (2002). Foreign direct investment and technological capabilities in Brazilian industry. Research Policy, 31 (8-9), 1431-1443.
37. Crépon, B., Duguet, E., and Mairesse, J. (1998). Research and development, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7 (2), 115-158.
38. Crespi, G., and Peirano, F. (2007a). Innovation surveys in Latin America: An overview of the experience in Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Uruguay [Mimeo].
39. Crespi, G., and Peirano, F. (2007b). Measuring innovation in Latin America: What we did, where we are and what we want to do [Working Paper]. Micro Evidence on Innovation on Developing Economies, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Retrieved fromhttp://www.merit.unu.edu/MEIDE/papers/2007/
40. DeBresson, C., Shiging, X., and Mohnen, P. (2006). Estimating disparities, complementarities and gaps between regions and countries: the case of China and its provinces in 1993. In Blankley, W., Scerri, M., Molotja, N., & Saloojee, I. (Eds.). Measuring innovation in OECD and NON-OECD countries selected seminar papers (pp. 251-280). South Africa: HSRC Press.
41. De Mel, S., McKenzie, D., and Woodruff, C. (2009). Innovative firms or innovative owners? Determinants of innovation in micro, small, and medium enterprises. [Discussion Paper Series N. 3962]. Institute for the Study of Labor. Retrieved fromhttp://ftp.iza.org/dp3962.pdf
42. De Negri, J. A., Salerno, M. S., and Castro, A. B. (2008). Innovations, technological patterns and performance of Brazilian industrial [Working Paper]. Presented at Micro Evidence on Innovation on Developing Economies, Maastricht, 2. The Netherlands. Retrieved fromhttp://www.merit.unu.edu/MEIDE/papers/2008/1201546096_JD.pdf
43. Diyamett, B., and Wangwe, S. (2006). Innovation indicators within Sub-Saharan Africa: A specific case for Tanzania. In Blankley, W., Scerri, M., Molotja, N., and Saloojee, I. (Eds.). Measuring innovation in OECD and NON-OECD countries selected seminar papers (pp. 183-199). South Africa: HSRC Press.
44. Djiofack-Zebaze, C., and Keck, A. (2009). Telecommunications services in Africa: the impact of WTO commitments and unilateral reform on sector performance and economic growth. World Development, 37 (5), 919-940.
45. Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretations of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11, 147-162.
46. Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures and the microeconomic effects of innovations. Journal of Economic Literature, 26 (3), 1120-1171.
47. Encuesta de Desarollo e Innovación Tecnológica. (2005). Innovación y desarrollo tecnológico en la industria manufacturera Colombia 2003-2004. Departamento Nacional de Estadística, Colciencias, Bogotá. Retrieved from http://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/industria/innovacion_tecnol_ind_manufacturera.pdf
48. Encuesta Nacional Sobre Innovación y Conducta Tecnológica. (2005). Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos, Buenos Aires. Retrieved from http://www.indec.gov.ar/nuevaweb/cuadros/16/publicacion-enit-2005.pdf
49. European Statistics. (2008). Science, technology and innovation in Europe [Collection Pocketbooks]. Luxembourg: European Commission. Retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-30-08-148/EN/KS-30-08-148-EN.PDF
50. Fagerberg, J., and Srholec, M. (2009). Innovation systems, technology and development: Unpacking the relationships. In Lundvall, B. A., Joseph, K. J., Chaminade, C., & Vang, J. (Eds.). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries (pp. 337-359). Cheltenham, England: Edward-Elgar.
51. Falvey, R., Folster, N., and Memedovic, O. (2006). The role of intellectual property rights in technology transfer and economic growth: theory and evidence[Working Paper]. United Nations Industrial development Organization, Vienna. Retrieved fromhttp://www.unido.org/fileadmin/import/60030_05_IPR_rights_in_technology_transfer.pdf
52. Figueiredo, P. N. (2008). Industrial policy changes and firm-level technological capability development: evidence from northern Brazil. World Development, 36 (1), 55-88.
53. Freeman, C. (1995). The national system of innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Innovation, 19, 5-24.
54. Freeman, C., and Louçã, F. (2001). As time goes by: from the industrial revolution to the information revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Fridlyanova, S., Gokhberg, L., Gorodnikova, G., Gracheva, G., Kouznetsova, I., et al. (2012). Indicators of innovation in Russian Federation: data Book-M. Moscow: National University Research, Higher School of Economics.
56. Gabsi, F., Mhenni, H., and Koouba, K. (2008). Innovation determinants in emerging countries: an empirical study at the Tunisian firms level [Working Paper n° 17940 MPRA]. Munich University Library, Germany. Retrieved fromhttp://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/17940/1/MPRA_paper_17940.pdf
57. Gerryts, B. A., and Buys, A. J. (2008). R&D as a source of innovation in South Africa [Working Paper]. Presented at Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology Conference 2008: Technology Management for Sustainable Economies, University of Pretoria, Cape Town, South Africa. Retrieved fromhttp://researchspace.csir.co.za/dspace/bitstream/10204/3145/1/Gerryts_2008.pdf
58. Gonçalves, E. J., Lemos, M. B., and Negri, J. A. (2008). Condicionantes de la innovación tecnológica en Argentina y Brasil. CEPAL Review, 94, 75-99.
59. Gu, J., Humphrey, J., and Messner, D. (2008). Global governance and developing countries: the implications of the rise of China. World Development, 36 (2), 274-292.
60. Högselius, P. (2003). Can East European countries innovate?. [Working Paper]. Presented at Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics Academy Winter 2003 PhD Conference, Aalborg, Denmark. Retrieved fromhttp://www.druid.dk/conferences/winter2003/Paper/Hogselius.pdf
61. Human Science Research Council. (2009). South African survey of research and experimental development (R&D) 2007/08: high level Key results booklet 2007-08. Retrieved from http://www.hsrc.ac.za/Media_Release-387.phtml
62. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2005). Pesquisa de Inovação Tecnológica 2005. Rio de Janeiro: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/industria/pintec/2005/default.shtm
63. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas. (2005). Resultados Cuarta Encuesta de Innovación Tecnológica-2005 [Documentos]. Retrieved from http://www.innovamineriaantofagasta.cl/archivos/Resultados_Encuesta_Innovacion_2005.pdf
64. Intarakumnerd, P. (2007). Measuring innovation in catching-up economies: an experience from Thailand [Document]. National Science and Technology Development Agency. Retrieved fromhttp://www.cas.uio.no/research/0708innovation/CASworkshop_Patarapong.pdf
65. Intarakumnerd, P., and Chaminade, C. (2007). Strategy versus practice in innovation systems policy: the case of Thailand. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 15 (2), 197-213.
66. Intarakumnerd, P., Chairatana, P., and Tangchitpiboon, T. (2002). National innovation system in less successful developing countries: the case of Thailand. Research Policy, 31 (8-9), 1445-1457.
67. Johnson, D. K. N. (2002). Learning-by-licensing: R&D and technology licensing in Brazilian invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11 (3), 163-177.
68. Keller, W. (2004). International technology diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature, 42 (3), 752-782.
69. Knell, M., and Srholec, M. (2006). Innovation cooperation and foreign ownership in the Czech Republic [Working Paper]. Presented at 30th EIBA Annual Conference, Ljubljana. Retrieved from http://www.merit.unu.edu/MEIDE/papers/2007/KNELL_SRHOLEC_Innovation%20cooperation%20and%20foreign%20ownership%20in%20the%20Czech%20Republic.pdf
70. Lall, S. (1992). Technological capabilities and industrialisation. World Development, 20 (2), 165-186.
71. Lall, S., and Pietrobelli, C. (2002). Failing to compete: technology development and technology systems in Africa. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.
72. Langebaek, A., and Vasquez, D. E. (2007). Determinantes de la actividad innovadora en la industria manufacturera colombiana. Borradores de Economía 433. Retrieved fromhttp://www.banrep.gov.co/docum/ftp/borra433.pdf
73. Lederman, D., and Saenz, L. (2005). Innovation and development around the world, 1960-2000 [Working Paper n° 3774]. World Bank Policy Research, Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContent Server/WDSP/IB/2005/11/17/000016406_20051117162240/Rendered/PDF/wps3774.pdf
74. Lee, K., and Kang, S.-M. (2007). Innovation types and productivity growth: Evidence from Korean manufacturing firms. Global Economic Review, 36 (4), 343-359.
75. López, R. A. (2008). Foreign technology licensing, productivity, and spillovers. World Development, 36 (4), 560-574.
76. Lugones, G. (2006). The Bogotá Manual: standardising innovation indicators for Latin America and the Caribbean. In Blankley, W., Scerri, M., Molotja, N., & Saloojee, I. (Eds.). Measuring innovation in OECD and NON-OECD countries selected seminar papers (pp. 163-182). South Africa: HSRC Press.
77. Lundin, N., Mannfelt, B., Guan, X., and Deng, Y. (2008). S&T and innovation statistics in China: final project report to Vinnova [Working Paper, Working Party NESTI]. National Experts on Science and Technology Indicators, Paris, France.
78. Mairesse, J., and Mohnen, P. (2008). Innovation surveys and innovation policy [Working Paper]. Presented at the Conference En Route Vers Lisbonne, United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute Of Innovation and Technology, Luxembourg. Retrieved fromhttp://doku.iab.de/fdz/events/2009/Mairesse_Mohnen.pdf
79. Mairesse, J., and Mohnen, P. (2010). Using innovation surveys for econometric analysis [Working Paper n° 15857 UNU-MERIT]. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved fromwww.nber.org/papers/w15857.pdf?new_window=1
80. Mairesse, J., Zhao, Y., and Zhen, F. (2009). Employment growth and innovation in China: a firm level comparison across provinces and city districts [Working Paper]. Presented at the Conference on Micro Evidence on Innovation in Developing Economies, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 3. Retrieved fromhttp://www.merit.unu.edu/MEIDE/papers/2009/1235915501_FZ.pdf
81. Malaysian Science, and Technology Information Centre. (2006). National Survey of Innovation 2002-2004. Malaysia: Author. Retrieved from http://www.mastic.gov.my/web/guest/national-survey-of-innovation-2002-2004
82. Marotta, D., Mark, M., Blom, A., and Thorn, C. (2007). Human Capital and University-Industry linkages' role in fostering firm innovation: an empirical study of Chile and Colombia [Working Paper n° 4443]. World Bank the Policy Research, Washington, DC. Retrieved fromhttp://elibrary.worldbank.org/docserver/download/4443.pdf?expires=1344262255&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=A734265DDB86912348A93A67C83B92CE
83. Masso, J., and Vahter, P. (2008). Technological innovation and productivity in late-transition Estonia: econometric evidence from innovation surveys. The European Journal of Development Research, 20 (2), 240-261.
84. Meschi, E., Taymaz, E., and Vivarelli, M. (2008). Trade openness and the demand for skills: evidence from Turkish microdata [Discussion Paper n° 3887]. Institute for the Study of Labor, Germany. Retrieved fromhttp://ftp.iza.org/dp3887.pdf
85. Morrison, A., Pietrobelli, C., and Rabelotti, R. (2006). Global value chains and technological capabilities: a framework to study industrial innovation in developing countries. Oxford Development Studies, 36 (1), 39-58.
86. Nannan, L., Sjöholm, F., and Qian, J. (2006). The role of small firms in China's technology development [Working paper 227]. Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden. Retrieved fromhttp://swopec.hhs.se/eijswp/papers/eijswp0227.pdf
87. Nelson, R. R. (2006). Economic development from the perspective of evolutionary economic theory [Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics n° 2]. Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn. Retrieved fromhttp://technologygovernance.eu/files/main/2006013112494141.pdf
88. Oerlemans, L. A. G., Pretorius, M. W., and Buys, A. J. (2006) Research design for the South African innovation survey 2001 [Working Paper 01.02]. Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies, The Netherlands. Retrieved fromhttp://alexandria.tue.nl/repository/books/545741.pdf
89. Oerlemans, L. A. G., Pretorius, M. W., Buys, A. J., and Rooks, G. (2003). South African Innovation Survey 2001: for manufacturing and services. Industrial Innovation in South African (Report in South African Innovation Survey for the Period 1998-2000). Retrieved fromhttp://web.up.ac.za/UserFiles/sais2001-1.pdf
90. Oh, I., Han, S., and Heshmati, A. (2007). The relationship between innovation and performance of Korean manufacturing firms [Working Paper]. Presented at the Conference on Micro Evidence on Innovation in Developing Economies, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Retrieved fromhttp://www.merit.unu.edu/MEIDE/papers/2008/1198624264_IO.pdf
91. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation, and Development. (2002). Frascati manual: proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris: Author. Retrieved from http://www.mct.gov.br/index.php/content/view/4639.html
92. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation, and Development. (2005). Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Source OECD Science & Information Technology, 18, 166-167.
93. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation, and Development. (2007). Innovation and growth rationale for an innovation strategy. Paris: Author. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/40908171.pdf
94. Pavitt, K. (1984). Patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343-374.
95. Pérez, C. (1994). Technical change and the new context for development. In Mytelka, L. (Ed.). South and south co-operation in a global perspective (pp. 55-87). Paris: OECD.
96. Pérez, C. (2002). Technological revolutions and financial capital. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
97. Pérez, C. (2008). A vision for Latin America: a resource-based strategy for technological dynamism and social inclusion [Working Paper Series WPG 0804]. Cambridge University, UK. Retrieved fromhttp://dcsh.xoc.uam.mx/eii/globelicswp/wp0804-en.pdf
98. Pianta, M. (2001). Innovation, demand and employment. In Petit, P., Soete, L. (Eds.), Technology and the future of European employment, (Chap. 5, pp. 142-165). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
99. Ping, H., Qian, J., Lundin, N., and Sjöholm, F. (2008). Technology development and job creation in China's manufacturing sector [Working Paper]. Presented at the Conference on Micro Evidence on Innovation in Developing Economies, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 3. Retrieved fromhttp://www.merit.unu.edu/MEIDE/papers/2008/1201748102_PH.pdf
100. Prochnik, V., and Araujo, R. D. (2005). Uma análise do baixo grau de inovação na indústria brasileira a partir do estudo das firmas menos inovadoras. [Mimeo]. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Rio de Janeiro, BR.
101. Radosevic, S. (1999). Patterns of innovative activities in countries of Central and Eastern Europe: an analysis based on comparison of innovation surveys [Working Paper Series n°35 SPRU Electronic]. Brighton, UK: University of Sussex, Science and Technology Policy Research.
102. Radosevic, S. (2004). A two-tier or multi-tier Europe?: assessing the innovation capacities of central and east European countries in the Enlarged EU. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42 (3), 641-666.
103. Radosevic, S. (2006). Innovation surveys in central and eastern Europe: results and policy issues. In Blankley, W., Scerre, M., Molotja, N., and Saloojee, I. (Eds.), Measuring innovation in OECD and non-OECD countries, (Chap. 13, pp. 199-216). South Africa: HSRC Press.
104. Red Iberoamericana de Incicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología Organización de Estados Americanos; Programa Iberoamericano de Ciencia e Tecnología para o Desarrollo; Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Observatorio Colombiano de Ciencia e Tecnología. (2001). Normalización de indicadores de innovación tecnológica en América Latina y el Caribe: manual de Bogotá. Colombia: Authors. Retrieved from http://www.uis.unesco.org/Library/Documents/Bogota%20Manual_Spa.pdf
105. Roud, V. (2007). Firm-level research on innovation and productivity: Russian experience [Working Paper]. Higher School of Economics Moscow, Russian Federation. Retrieved from http://www.merit.unu.edu/MEIDE/papers/2007/ROUD_Firm-level%20research%20on%20innovation%20and%20productivity_Russian%20experience.pdf
106. Roud, V. (2008). Patterns of innovative behaviour of Russian manufacturing firms: analysis of firm- level data [Working Paper]. Presented at the Conference on Micro Evidence on Innovation in Developing Economies, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 2. Retrieved fromhttp://www.merit.unu.edu/MEIDE/papers/2008/1201827040_VR.pdf
107. Salazar, M., and Holbrook, A. (2004). A debate on innovation surveys. Science and Public Policy, 31 (4), 254-266.
108. Sargent, J., and Matthews, L. (2008). Capital intensity, technology intensity, and skill development in post China/WTO maquiladoras. World Development, 36 (4), 541-559.
109. Schumpeter, J. A. (1976). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper.
110. Science, Technology, and Enterprise Plan. (2005). Report on the Korean Innovation Survey 2005: the manufacturing sector. Singapore: Author.
111. Seo, J. W. (2004). Analysis on difference in effects of multiple sources of technological innovation. [Working Paper]. STEP I Innovation Survey, Seoul, Korea.
112. Seo, K. W., and Lee, C. Y. (2004). The hampering factors of technological innovation in Korean firms. Technological Innovation Study, 12(1).
113. Shin, T. Y. (2003). Innovation behaviours of Korea's manufacturing firms: some empirical evidences based on the Korean innovation survey (KIS) dataset [Working Paper n° 6]. STEP I Innovation Survey, Seoul, Korea.
114. Smith, K. (2005). Measuring innovation. In Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., & Nelson, R. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
115. Stiglitz, J. (2008). Economic foundations of intellectual property rights. Duke Law Journal, 57, 1692-1724.
116. Sung, T. K., (2004). Networks, technological opportunity, and innovative activity: evidence from the Korean manufacturing firms [Working Paper]. Singapore, Southeast Asian: Science, Technology & Enterprise Plan.
117. Sung, T. K., and Carlsson, B. (2007). Network effects, technological opportunity, and innovation: evidence from the Korean manufacturing firms. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 15 (1), 91-108.
118. Sutz, J. (2000). Las encuestas de innovación latinoamericanas: un ánalisis comparativo de las formas de indagación. Normalización de Indicadores de Innovación Tecnológica en America Latina [Working paper]. Washington, DC: Organização dos Estados Americanos.
119. Sutz, J. (2007). Innovation surveys: critical assessment of a potentially powerful policy tool [Working Paper]. Presented at Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy 2007, Georgia, Atlanta.
120. Taiwan Council for Economic Planning, and Development. (2009). Taiwan statistical data book. Retrieved from http://www.cepd.gov.tw/encontent/m1.aspx?sNo=0011995
121. Turkish Statistical Institute. (2008). Innovation survey in industry and service. Turkey: Turkish Statistical Institute, 16 (25), 173-194.
122. Turriago, A. H. (2003). Some aspects of technological innovation and activities in Colombia: Comparison with three Latin American countries. Cuadernos de Administración de la Universidad Javeriana. Retrieved fromhttp://redalyc.uaemex.mx/pdf/205/20502508.pdf
123. United Nations Development Programme. (2001). Human development report: making new technologies work for human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
124. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. (2003). Industrial development report 2002-2003: competing through innovation and learning. Vienna: Author.
125. Vahter, P. (2006). Productivity in estonian enterprises: the role of innovation and competition [Working Papers Series n° 7]. Eesti Pank Bank of Estonia, Estonia. Retrieved fromhttp://www.eestipank.info/pub/en/dokumendid/publikatsioonid/seeriad/uuringud/_2006/_7_2006/_wp_706.pdf
126. Wang, H.-T., Mu, T., Chen, L.-K., Lin, T.-M., Chiang, C.-M., et al. (2003). A survey for technological innovation in Taiwan. Journal of Data Science, 1, 337-360.
127. Wong, P.-K., Kiese, M., and Singh, A. (2000). National innovation survey manufacturing sector: final internal report. [Mimeo]. National University of Singapore, Centre for Management of Innovation and Technopreneurship, Singapore.
128. Wong, P.-K., and Singh, A. (2005). From technology adopter to innovator: the dynamics of change in Singapore's national innovation system [Working Papers n°. 16]. National University of Singapore, Entrepreneurship Centre, Singapore. Retrieved fromhttp://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN023983.pdf
129. World Bank. (1999). World development report 1998-1999: knowledge for development. Washington: Author.
130. Wu, S.-H., Shia, B.-C., Chen, L.-K., Huang, W.-J., Cheng, Y.-T., Su, C.-H., Chiang, C.-M. (2008). Taiwan Innovation Survey Overview. 2008 International Conference of Innovation Survey Proceeding (pp. 3-30). Taipei, Taiwan: NCCU.
131. Yegorov, I. (2008). Innovation policy and problems of creation and development of the National Innovation System in Ukraine [Working Paper]. Presented for the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Conference, Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved fromhttp://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/ceci/ppt_presentations/2008/ic/YegorovPaper.pdf