Innovation and productivity in developing countries: A study of Argentine manufacturing firms' behavior (1992-2001)

Research Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 266-288

  Chudnovsky, Daniel ^a   López, Andrés ^b   Pupato, Germán ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN ANDRÉS   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Innovation; Productivity; R and D; Technology acquisition

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

INNOVATION; PAYOFFS; TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION;

PRODUCTIVITY;

EID: 33644542751     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. D. Archibugi, and G. Sirilli The direct measurement of technological innovation in business in innovation and enterprise creation: statistics and indicators Proceedings of the Conference held at Sophia Antipolis November 2000
2. Baldwin, J., Hanel, P., Sabourin, D., 2002. Determinants of innovative activity in Canadian manufacturing firms. In: Kleinknecht, A., Mohnen, P. (Eds.), Innovation and Firm Performance. Econometric Explorations of Survey Data. Palgrave, New York.
3. Benavente, J.M., in press. The role of research and innovation in promoting productivity in Chile. Economics of Innovation and New Technology.
4. Chudnovsky, D., López, A., Pupato, G., 2003. Innovation inputs and outputs in Argentine manufacturing firms in bad times prepared for the First GLOBELICS Conference on Innovation Systems and Development: Strategies for the Third Millennium, Rio de Janeiro, November.
5. W. Cohen, and S. Klepper A reprise of size and R and D The Economic Journal 106 437 1996 925 951
6. B. Crepon, E. Duguet, and I. Kabla Schumpeterian conjectures: a moderate support from various innovation measures A. Kleinknecht Determinants of Innovation. The Message from New Indicators 1996 Macmillan London (Chapter 3)
7. Crepon, B., Duguet, E., Mairesse J., 1998. Research, innovation and productivity: an econometric analysis at the firm level, NBER Working Paper 6696.
8. Duguet E., 2002. Innovation height, spillovers and TFP growth at the firm level: evidence from French manufacturing. Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques, EUREQua 2002.73.
9. C. Edquist Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations 1997 Pinter Publishers/Cassell Academic London
10. Galia, F., Legros, D., 2002. Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: empirical study on a French data set, paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference 2003 on Industrial dynamics of the New and Old Economy - who is embracing whom? June 2003.
11. Guerrieri, P., Milana, C., 1989. L' industria italiana nel commercio mondiale, Ed. Il Mulino, Bologna.
12. J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error Econometrica 47 1 1979 153 162
13. Hu, A., Jefferson, G., Jinchang, Q., 2003. R and D and technology transfer. Firm-level evidence from Chinese industry (mimeo).
14. INDEC-SECYT, 1998. Encuesta sobre la conducta tecnológica de las empresas industriales argentinas, Serie Estudios, No. 31, Buenos Aires.
15. INDEC-SECYT-CEPAL, 2003. Segunda Encuesta Nacional de Innovación y Conducta Tecnológica de las Empresas Argentinas, Serie Estudios No. 38, Buenos Aires.
16. Jefferson, G., Huamao, B., Xioajing, G., Xiaoyun, Y., in press. R and D Performance in Chinese Industry, Economics of Innovation and New Technology.
17. M. Kamien, and N. Schwartz Market Structure and Innovation 1982 Cambridge University Press New York
18. Kemp, R., Folkeringa, M., De Jong, J., Wubben, E., 2003. Innovation and firm performance, scale. Scientific analysis of entrepreneurship and SMEs, Research Report H200207.
19. A. Kleinknecht P. Mohnen Innovation and Firm Performance. Econometric Explorations of Survey Data 2002 Palgrave New York
20. S. Kline, and N. Rosenberg An overview of innovation R. Landau N. Rosenberg The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth 1986 National Academic Press Washington, DC 275 306
21. Long, S., 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. In: Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences, vol. 7. Sage Publications, pp. 148-186.
22. H. Lööf, and A. Heshmati Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity: a firm-level innovation study International Journal of Production Economics 76 1 2002 61 85
23. Lööf, H., Heshmati, A., in press. On the relationship between innovation and performance: a sensitivity analysis, economics of innovation and new technology.
24. Lööf, H., Heshmati, A., Asplund, R., Naas, S., 2001. Innovation and performance in manufacturing industries: a comparison of the Nordic countries. SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, No. 457.
25. Mairesse, J., Mohnen, P., 2003. R and D and productivity: a reexamination in light of the innovation surveys, paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference 2003 on Creating, Shearing and Transferring Knowledge. The role of Geography, Institutions and Organizations.
26. OECD The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data (Oslo Manual) 1997 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Paris
27. Parisi, M.L., Schiantarelli F., Sembenelli, A., 2002. Productivity, innovation creation and absorption, and R and D: micro evidence for Italy. Boston College Working Papers in Economics 526/Boston College Department of Economics.
28. Pavitt, K., 1984. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy 13 (6), 343-373.
29. RICYT, 2001. Standardization of indicators of technological innovation in Latin American and Caribbean countries (Bogotá Manual). Iberoamerican network of science and technology indicators (RICYT). March.
30. F.M. Scherer Schumpeter and plausible capitalism Journal of Economic Literature 1992 30
31. J.A. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy 1942 Harper New York
32. Van Leeuwen, G., 2002. Linking innovation to productivity growth using two waves of CIS, STI Working Paper 2002/8, OECD.
33. Van Leeuwen, G., Klomp, L., 2001. On the contribution of innovation to multifactor productivity growth. Research Paper 0201. Methods and Informatics Department, Statistics Netherlands.
34. J.M. Wooldridge Econometric Analysis of Cross-section and Panel Data 2001 MIT Press Cambridge Mass