Newer challenges to restore hemiparetic upper extremity after stroke: HANDS therapy and BMI neurorehabilitation

Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 83-92

  Liu, Meigen ^a   Fujiwara, Toshiyuki ^a   Shindo, Keiichiro ^a   Kasashima, Yuko ^a   Otaka, Yohei ^a   Tsuji, Tetsuya ^a   Ushiba, Junichi ^b  

^a KEIO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Electrical stimulation; Electroencephalography; Neural plasticity

Indexed keywords

ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN MACHINE INTERFACE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONSTRAINT INDUCED THERAPY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; HYBRID ASSISTIVE NEUROMUSCULAR DYNAMIC STIMULATION; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROFEEDBACK; NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SPASTICITY;

EID: 84868671054     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10137025     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.hkpj.2012.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Hendricks H.T., van Limbeek J., Geurts A.C., Zwarts M.J. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002, 83:1629-1637.
2. Duncan P.W., Lai S.M., Keighley J. Defining post-stroke recovery: implications for design and interpretation of drug trials. Neuropharmacology 2000, 39:835-841.
3. Nakayama H., Jorgensen H.S., Raaschou H.O., Olsen T.S. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994, 75:394-398.
4. Nudo R.J., Milliken G.W. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol 1996, 75:2144-2149.
5. Biernaskie J., Chemenko G., Corbett D. Efficacy of rehabilitative experience declines with time after focal ischemic brain injury. J Neurosci 2004, 24:1245-1254.
6. Kwakkel G., van Peppen R., Wagenaar R.C., Wood Dauphinee S., Richards C., Ashbum A., et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2004, 35:2529-2539.
7. Langhorne P., Coupar F., Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2009, 8:741-754.
8. Dean C.M., Shepherd R. Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Stroke 1997, 28:722-728.
9. Jang Sung H.C.A., Kim Yun-Hee, Cho Sang-Hyun, Lee Jin-Hee, Park Ji-Won, Kwon Yong-Hyun Cortical reorganization induced by task-oriented training in chronic hemiplegic stroke patients. Neuro Report 2003, 20:137-141.
10. Whitall J., McCombe Waller M.S., Silver K.H.C., Macko R.F. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 2000, 31:2390-2395.
11. Luft Andreas R., McCombe-Waller S., Whitall J., Forrester L.W., Macko R., Sorkin J.D., et al. Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004, 292:1853-1861.
12. Dromerick A.W., Edwards D.F., Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke?. Stroke 2000, 31:2984-2988.
13. Sterr A., Elbert T., Berthold I., Kolbel S., Rockstroh B., Taub E. Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002, 83:1374-1377.
14. Wolf S.T., Winstein C.J., Miller J.P., Taub E., Uswatte G., Morris D., et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006, 296:2095-2214.
15. Meilink A., Hemmen B., Seelen H.A., Kwakkel G. Impact of EMG-triggered neuromuscular stimulation of the wrist and finger extensors of the paretic hand after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil 2008, 22:291-305.
16. de Kroon J.R., Ijzerman M.J., Chae J., Lankhorst G.J., Zilvoid G. Relation between stimulation characteristics and clinical outcome in studies using electrical stimulation to improve motor control of the upper extremity in stroke. J Rehabil Med 2005, 37:65-74.
17. Thrasher T.A., Zivanovic V., McIlroy W., Popovic M.R. Rehabilitation of reaching and grasping function in severe hemiplegic patients using functional electrical stimulation therapy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008, 22:706-714.
18. Mangold S., Schuster C., Keller T., Zimmermann-Schlatter A., Ettlin T. Motor training of upper extremity with functional electrical stimulation in early stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009, 23:184-190.
19. Chan M.K., Tong R.K., Chung K.Y. Bilateral upper limb training with functional electric stimulation in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009, 23:357-365.
20. Fujiwara T., Kasashima Y., Honaga K., Muraoka Y., Tsuji T., Osu R., et al. Motor improvement and corticospinal modulation induced by hybrid assistive neuromuscular dynamic stimulation (HANDS) therapy in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009, 23:125-132.
21. Shindo K., Fujiwara T., Hara J., Oba H., Hotta F., Tsuji T., et al. Effectiveness of ybrid assistive neuromuscular dynamic stimulation (HANDS) therapy in patients with subacute stroke - a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011, 25:830-837.
22. Kakuda W., Abo M., Kobayashi K., Takagishi T., Momosaki R., Yokoi A., et al. Baseline severity of upper limb hemiparesis influences the outcome of low-frequency rTMS combined with intensive occupational therapy in patients who have had a stroke. PMR 2011, 3:516-522.
23. Malcolm M.P., Triggs W.J., Light K.E., Gonzalez Rothi L.J., Wu S., Reid K., et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an adjunct to constraint-induced therapy: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007, 86:707-715.
24. Lindenberg R., Renga V., Zhu L.L., Nair D., Schlaug G. Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology 2010, 24:2176-2184.
25. Hesse S., Werner C., Shonhardt E.M., Bardeleben A., Jenrich W., Kirker S.G. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: a pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007, 25:9-15.
26. Volpe B.T., Krebs H.I., Hogan N., Edelstein L., Diels C., Aisen M. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology 2000, 54:1938-1944.
27. Lum P.S., Burgar C.G., Shor P.C., Majmundar M., Van der Loos M. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002, 83:952-959.
28. Fasoli S.E., Krebs H.I., Stein J., Frontera W.R., Hogan N. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003, 84:477-482.
29. Ziemann U., Corwell B., Cohen L.G. Modulation of plasticity in human motor cortex after forearm ischemic nerve block. J Neurosci 1998, 18:1115-1123.
30. Buch E., Weber C., Cohen lG., Braun C., Dimyan M.A., Ard T., et al. Think to move: a neuromagnetic brain-computer interface (BCI) system for chronic stroke. Stroke 2008, 39:910-917.
31. Daly J.J., Wolpaw J.R. brain-computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol 2008, 7:1032-1043.
32. Subramanian S.K., Massie C.L., Malcolm M.P., Levin M.F. Does provision of extrinsic feedback result in improved motor learning in the upper limb poststroke? A systematic review of the evidence. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010, 24:113-124.
33. Pfurtscheller G., Muller-Putz G.R., Scherer R., Neuper C. Rehabilitation with brain-computer interface systems. Computer 2008, 41:58-65.
34. Broetz D., Braun C., Weber C., Soekadar S.R., Caria A., Birbaumer N. Combination of brain-computer interface training and goal- directed physical therapy in chronic stroke: a case report. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010, 24:674-679.
35. Ang K.K., Guan C., Chua K.S., Ang B.T., Kuah C., Wang C., et al. A clinical study of motor imagery-based brain-computer interface for upper limb robotic rehabilitation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009, 2009:5981-5984.
36. Daly J.J., Cheng R., Rogers J., Litinas K., Hrovat K., Dohring M. Feasibility of a new application of noninvasive brain computer interface (BCI): a case study of training for recovery of volitional motor control after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther 2009, 33:203-211.
37. Shindo K., Kawashima K., Ushiba J., Ohta N., Ito M., Ota T., et al. Effects of neurofeedback training with an electroencephalogram-based brain computer interface for hand paralysis in patients with chronic stroke - a preliminary case series study. J Rehabil Med 2011, 43:951-957.
38. Wolf S.L., Winstein C.J., Miller J.P., Thompson P.A., Taube E., Uswatte G., et al. Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint- induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2008, 7:33-40.
39. Muraoka Y. Development of an EMG recording device from stimulation electrodes for functional electrical stimulation. Frontiers Med Biol Engng 2002, 11:323-333.
40. Fujiwara T., Liu M., Hase K., Tanaka N., Hara Y. Electrophysiological and clinical assessment of a simple wrist-hand splint for patients with chronic spastic hemiparesis secondary to stroke. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2004, 44:423-442.
41. Fujiwara T., Liu M., Kasashima Y., Uemura O. Treatment of upper extremity dysfunction in hemiparetic stroke. Jpn J Rehabil Med 2006, 43:743-746. [in Japanese].
42. Chino N., Sonoda S., Domen K., Saitoh E., Kimura A. Stroke impairment assessment set (SIAS). Functional evaluation of stroke patients 1995, 19-31. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo. N. Chino, J.L. Melvin (Eds.).
43. Tsuji T., Liu M., Sonoda S., Domen K., Chino N. The stroke impairment assessment set: its internal consistency and predictive validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000, 81:863-868.
44. Liu M., Liu M., Chino N., Tsuji T., Masakado Y., Hase K., et al. Psychometric properties of the stroke impairment assessment set (SIAS). Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002, 16:339-351.
45. SPSS Answer Tree V3.0 Win App., Tokyo: SPSS Japan Inc.
46. Bohannon R.W., Smith M.B. Interrater reliability of a modified ash- worth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 1987, 67:206-207.
47. Day B.L., Marsden C.D., Obeso J.A., Rothwell J.C. Reciprocal inhibition between the muscles of the human forearm. J Physiol 1984, 349:519-534.
48. Kujirai T., Caramia M.D., Rothwell J.C., Day B.L., Thompson P.D., Ferbert A., et al. Cortico-cortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol 1993, 471:501-519.
49. Fugl-Meyer A.R., Jääskö L., Leyman I., Olsson S., Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975, 7:13-31.
50. Yozbatiran N., Der-Yeghianian L., Cramer S.C. A standard approach to performing the action research arm test. Neurorehabil Nerual Repair 2008, 22:78-90.
51. Li C., Liu T., Inoue Y., Shibata K. Evaluation of a bimanual-coordinated upper-limbs training system based on the near infrared spectroscopic signals on brain. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010, 6625-6628.
52. Yanagisawa T., Hirata M., Saitoh Y., Kato A., Shibuya D., Kamitani Y., et al. Neural decoding using gyral and intrasulcal electrocorticograms. Neuroimage 2009, 45:1099-1106.
53. Uswatte G., Taub E., Morris D., Vignolo M., McCulloch K. Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity motor activity log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke 2005, 36:2493-2496.
54. Matsumoto J., Fujiwara T., Takahasi O., Liu M., Kimura A., Ushiba J. Modulation of mu rhythm desynchronization during motor imagery by transcranial direct current stimulation. J Neuro Eng Rehabil 2010, 7:27.
55. Kasahima Y., Fujiwara T., Matsushika Y., Tsuji T., Hase K., Ushiyama J., et al. Modulation of event related desynchronization during motor imagery with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in patients with chronic hemiparetic stroke. Exp Brain Res 2012, 221:263-268.
56. Mulder T. Motor imagery and action observation: cognitive tools for rehabilitation. J Neural Transm 2007, 114:1265-1278.
57. Zimmermann-Schlatter A., Schuster C., Puhan M.A., Siekierka E., Steurer J. Efficacy of motor imagery in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2008, 14:5-8.
58. Caramia M.D., Palmieri M.G., Giacomini P., Iani C., Dally L., Silvestrini M. Ipsilateral activation of the unaffected motor cortex in patients with hemiparetic stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 2000, 111:1990-1996.
59. Woldag H., Lukhaup S., Renner C., Hummelsheim H. Enhanced motor cortex excitability during ipsilateral voluntary hand activation in healthy subjects and stroke patients. Stroke 2004, 35:2556-2559.
60. Marshall R.S., Perera G.M., Lazar R.M., Krakauer J.W., Constantine R.C., DeLaPaz R.L. Evolution of cortical activation during recovery from corticospinal tract infarction. Stroke 2000, 31:656-661.
61. Lindberg P., Schmitz C., Forssberg H., Engardt M., Borg J. Effects of passive-active movement training on upper limb motor function and cortical activation in chronic patients with stroke: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med 2004, 36:117-123.
62. Sharma N., Baron J.C., Rowe J.B. Motor imagery after stroke: relating outcome to motor network connectivity. Ann Neurol 2009, 66:604-616.
63. Bakhei A.M.O., Thilmann A.F., Ward A.B., Poewe W., Wissel J., Muller J., et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study to compare the efficacy and safety of three doses of botulinum toxin type A (Dysport) with placebo in upper limb spasticity after stroke. Stroke 2000, 31:2402-2406.