The evolution of policy attitudes in France

European Union Politics

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 293-316

  Stimson, James A ^a   Thiébaut, Cyrille ^b   Tiberj, Vincent ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 1 PANTHÉON SORBONNE   (France)

^c SCIENCES PO   (France)

Author keywords

dimension; ideology; opinion; preference; structure

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868665238     PISSN: 14651165     EISSN: 17412757     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1465116512436703     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adorno T,Frenkel-Brunswick D,Levinson D,Sanford NThe Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper & Row; 1950:.
2. Andersen R,Evans J.Identifying Europe?.Politique Européenne. 2005;2:53-79.
3. Bartle J,Dellepiani S,Stimson JA.The moving centre: Policy preferences in Britain, 1950-2005.British Journal of Political Science. 2011;41:259-285.
4. Brouard S,Tiberj V.The French referendum: The not so simple act of saying nay.PS: Political Science and Politics. 2006;39:261-268.
5. Carmines EG,Stimson JAIssue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1989:.
6. Chiche J,Le Roux B,Perrineau P,Rouanet H.L'espace politique des électeurs français à la fin des années 1990. Nouveaux et anciens clivages, hétérogéneité des électorats.Revue française de science politique. 2000;50:463-488.
7. De Vries CE,Hobolt SB.When dimensions collide: The electoral success of issue entrepreneurs.European Union Politics. 2012;13 (2): 246-268.
8. Duverger MPolitical Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Taylor & Francis; 1963:.
9. Gould SJThe Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press; 2002:.
10. Gould SJPunctuated Equilibrium. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press; 2007:.
11. Grunberg G,Schweisguth ÉL'électeur français en question. Paris: Presses de la FNSP; 1990:45-70.
12. Grunberg G,Schweisguth ÉL'électeur a ses raisons. Boy DMeyer N, ed. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po; 1997:179-218.
13. Grunberg G,Schweisguth É.French political space: Two, three or four blocs?.French Politics. 2003;1:331-347.
14. Houtman D,Achterberg P,Derks AFarewell to the Leftist Working Class. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers; 2008:.
15. Kriesi HP,Grande E,Lachat R,Dolezal M,Bornschier S,Frey TWest European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006:.
16. Laver M,Benoit K,Sauger N.Policy competition in the 2002 French legislative and presidential elections.European Journal of Political Research. 2006;45:667-697.
17. Lipset SM,Rokkan SParty Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. Lipset SMRokkan S, ed. New York: Free Press; 1967:1-64.
18. Martin PComprendre les évolutions électorales. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po; 2000:.
19. Riker WHLiberalism against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman; 1982:.
20. Roux G.Quelle évolution de la xénophobie en France?.Futuribles. 2006;319:19-42.
21. Stimson JAPublic Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1991:.
22. Stimson JATides of Consent: How Public Opinion Shapes American Politics. New York and London: Cambridge University Press; 2004:.
23. Tiberj VLa crispation hexagonale: France fermée contre France plurielle, 2001-2007. Paris: Foundation Jean Jaurès 2008:.
24. Wlezien C.The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending.American Journal of Political Science. 1995;39:981-1000.
25. Zaller JRThe Nature and Origins of Mass Opinions. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1992:.