Policy competition in the 2002 French legislative and presidential elections

European Journal of Political Research

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 667-697

  Laver, Michael ^a   Benoit, Kenneth ^b   Sauger, Nicolas ^c  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^c Centre for Political Research of Sciences   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745451430     PISSN: 03044130     EISSN: 14756765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00313.x     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Benoit, K. & Laver, M. (2003). Mapping the Irish Policy Space: Voter and Party Spaces in Preferential Elections. Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, 27-31 August.
2. Benoit, K. & Laver, M. (2005). Party policy in modern democracies. London: Routledge.
3. Bruno, J., Jérôme-Speziari, V. & Lewis-Beck, M.S. (2003). Reordering the French election calendar: Forecasting the consequences for 2002. European Journal of Political Research 42(3): 409-424.
4. Chiche J. et al. (2000). L'espace politique des électeurs français à la fin des années 1990. Revue Française de Science Politique 50(3): 463-488.
5. Dow, J.K. (1998). A spatial analysis of the 1989 Chilean presidential election. Electoral Studies 17(1): 61-76.
6. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
7. Enelow, J.M. & Hinich, M. (1984). The spatial theory of voting: An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Enelow, J.M. & Hinich, M. (eds) (1990). Advances in the spatial theory of voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Esquenazi, J.-P. (2003). Lionel Jospin et la campagne de 2002: erreur de communication ou erreur politique? Vingtième siècle 80:101-112.
10. Gaffney, J. (ed.) (2004). The French presidential and legislative elections of 2002. Aldershot: Ashgate.
11. Gemie, S. (2004). An extremism of the center: Jean-Pierre Chevènement, French presidential candidate, 2002. French Politics Culture and Society 22(1): 76-97.
12. Grunberg, G. & Schweisguth, E. (1997). Vers une tripartition de l'espace politique. In D. Boy & N. Mayer (eds), L'électeur a ses raisons. Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po.
13. Hinich, M.J. & Munger, M.C. (1994). Ideology and the theory of political choice. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
14. Hinich, M.J. & Munger, M.C. (1997). Analytical politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Iversen, T. (1994). Political leadership and representation in West European democracies: A test of three models of voting. American Journal of Political Science 38: 45-74.
16. Jaffré, J. (2003). Comprendre l'élimination de Lionel Jospin. In P. Perrineau & C. Ysmal (eds), Le vote de tous les refus. Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po.
17. Knapp, A. (2004). Parties and the party system in France: A disconnected democracy? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Kuhn, R. (2002). The French presidential and parliamentary elections, 2002. Representation 39(1): 44-46.
19. Laver, M. & Schofield, N. (1998). Multiparty government. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
20. Laver, M. & Hunt, B. (1992). Party and policy competition. London: Routledge.
21. Laver, M., Benoit, K. & Garry, J. (2003). Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review 97(2): 311-331.
22. Lewis-Beck, M.S. (ed.) (2003). The French voter. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
23. Merrill, S. III. (1995). Discriminating between the directional and proximity spatial models of electoral competition. Electoral Studies 14: 273-287.
24. Merrill, S. III & Grofman, B. (1999). A unified theory of voting: Directional and proximity spatial models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Parodi, J.-L. (2002). Les effets pervers d'une présélection annoncée. Revue Française de Science Politique 52(5-6): 485-504.
26. Perrineau, P. & Ysmal, C. (eds) (2003). Le vote de tous les refus. Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po.
27. Schofield, N. et al. (1998). Multiparty electoral competition in the Netherlands and Germany: A model based on multinomial probit. Public Choice 97: 257-293.