Patients' access to their health information: A meaningful-use mandate

Journal of Nursing Administration

Volumn 42, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 493-496

  Wilson, Marisa L ^a   Murphy, Lyn Stankiewicz ^a   Newhouse, Robin P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ECONOMICS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MEANINGFUL USE CRITERIA; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; NURSE ADMINISTRATOR; NURSE ATTITUDE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT RIGHT; REIMBURSEMENT; UNITED STATES;

AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT; CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES (U.S.); ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; MEANINGFUL USE; NURSE ADMINISTRATORS; NURSE'S ROLE; PATIENT ACCESS TO RECORDS; REIMBURSEMENT, INCENTIVE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84868649901     PISSN: 00020443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182714538     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Buntin MB, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC, Blumenthal D. The benefits of health information technology: A review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Aff. 2011;30(3):464-471
2. Centers for Medicaid &Medicare Services. EHR incentive programs. CMS.gov Web site. http://www.cms .gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/ Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/ index.html. Updated 2012. Accessed August 2, 2012
3. Center for Advancing Health. A new definition of patient engagement: what is engagement and why is it important? http://cfah.org/resources/publications .cfm. Accessed August 2, 2012
4. Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA). Meaningful use stage 1 clinical qualitymeasure for the safety net community. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Web site. http:// hrsa.gov/healthit/meaningfuluse/mu% 20Stage1%20CQM/index.html. Accessed August 2, 2012
5. PwCHealth Research Institute. Putting patients into meaningful use. http:// www.himss.org/content/files/http pwchealth.com-cgi-local-hregister. cgi-link%3Dreg-putting-patientsinto- meaningful-use.pdf. Accessed August 2, 2012
6. PernaG. TheAHA's controversial position stirs debate. Health Informatics Web site. PublishedMay 4, 2012. http:// www.healthcare-informatics.com/blogs/ gabriel-perna/aha-s-controversial-positionstirs- debate. Accessed August 2, 2012
7. Ahier B. Promoting patient engagement meaningful use. Healthcare IT News Web site. Published April 17, 2012. http://www.healthcareitnews.com/ blog/promoting-patient-engagementmeaningful- use. Accessed August 2, 2012
8. Kaiser Permanente. Nearly 9 million Kaiser Permanente health records securely available on mobile devices. Kaiser Permanente News CenterWeb site. Published January 14, 2012. http://xnet.kp .org/newscenter/pressreleases/nat/ 2012/ 012412kporgmobileoptimized.html. Accessed August 2, 2012
9. Department of Veterans Affairs. My HealtheVet. https://www.myhealth.va .gov/mhv-portal-web/anonymous .portal?-nfpb=true&-nfto=false&-pageLabel= mhvHome. Accessed August 2, 2012
10. Bell H, Bazzoli F. Portals hold promise for patient engagement but challenges remain. iHealthBeatWeb site. Published June 14, 2012. http://www.ihealthbeat .org/perspectives/2012/portals-holdpromise- for-patient-engagementbut- challenges-remain.aspx. Accessed August 2, 2012
11. Demiris G, Afrin LB, Speedie S, et al. Patient-centered applications: use of information technology to promote disease management and wellness. A white paper by the AMIA knowledge in motion working group. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(1):8-13
12. Barnes J. Let the evolution begin. Health Manag Technol. 2012;33(6):24. http:// search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct= true&db=buh&AN= 76244098&site= ehost-live
13. DesRoches CM, Worzala C, Joshi MS, Kralovec PD, Jha AK. Small, nonteaching, and rural hospitals continue to be slow in adopting electronic health record systems. Health Aff. 2012;31(5): 1092-1099
14. Ketikidis P, Dimitrovski T, Lazuras L, Bath PA. Acceptance of health information technology in health professionals: An application of the revised technology acceptance model. Health Inform J. 2012;18(2):124-134
15. Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inform Manage. 2003; 40(3):191-204
16. Moore GC, Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform Syst Res. 1991;2(3):192-222. http://search .ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct= true&db=buh&AN=4431054&site= ehost-live
17. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster; 2003:519
18. Chang S, Tung F. An empirical investigation of students' behavioural intentions to use the online learning course Web sites. Br J Educ Technol. 2008; 39(1):71-83. http://search.ebscohost .com/login.aspx?direct=true&db= aph&AN=28327244&site=ehost-live
19. Hardgrave BC, Davis FD, Riemenschneider CK. Investigating determinants of software developers' intentions to follow methodologies. J Manage Inf Syst. 2003;20(1):123-151. http://search.ebscohost.com/login .aspx?direct= true&db=buh&AN= 10221616&site=ehost-live
20. Lee Y, Hsieh Y, Hsu C. Adding innovation diffusion theory to the technology acceptance model: Supporting employees' intentions to use e-learning systems. J EducTechnol Soc. 2011;14(4):124-137. http://search.ebscohost.com/ login.aspx? di r e c t= true&db= aph&AN= 70269714&site=ehost-live
21. Wu J, Wang S. What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Inform Manage. 2005;42(5): 719-729.
22. Cox A, Illsley M, Knibb W, et al. The acceptability of e-technology tomonitor and assess patient symptoms following palliative radiotherapy for lung cancer. Palliat Med. 2011;25(7):675-681. http://search.ebscohost.com/login .aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN= 66698033&site=ehost-live
23. Labow K. We've got an app for that. HealthManagTechnol. 2011;32(8):24-25. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx? direct=true&db=buh&AN= 64738720& site=ehost-live
24. Fitzsimmons DA, Thompson J, Hawley M, Mountain GA. Preventative telehealth supported services for early stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial pilot. Trials. 2011;12(1):6.