Assessment research and school psychology: Introduction to the special topic

School Psychology Review

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 243-245

  Burns, Matthew K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868640772     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (18)

1. Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. F. ( 1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. ( 1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
3. Fadel, C., Honey, M., & Pasnik, S. ( 2007, May 18). Assessment in the age of innovation [Commentary]. Education Week, 26( 38), 34, 40.
4. Garb, H. N., Wood, J. M., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Nezworski, M. T. (2002). Effective use of projective techniques in clinical practice: Let the data help with selection and interpretation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 454-463. (Pubitemid 38422046)
5. Herman, K. C., Chris Riley-Tillman, T., & Reinke, W. M. ( 2012). The role of assessment in a prevention science framework. School Psychology Review, 41( 3), 306-314.
6. January, S. A., & Ardoin, S. P. ( 2012). The impact of context and word type on students' Maze task accuracy. School Psychology Review, 41( 3), 262-271.
7. Kane, M. T. ( 2001). Concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 319-342.
8. Kane, M. T. ( 2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement ( 4th ed., pp. 17-64). Westport, CT: American Council on Education/ Praeger.
9. Messick, S. ( 1989). Validity, in R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement ( 3rd ed.; pp. 13-103). National Council on Measurement in Education, American Council on Education. New York, NY: MacMillan.
10. Messick, S. ( 1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
11. Pitoniak, M. J., Young, J. W., Martiniello, M., King, T. C., Buteux, A., & Ginsburgh, M. ( 2009). Guidelines for the assessment of English language learners. Princeton, NJ: ETS.
12. Rikoon, S. H., McDermott, P. A., & Fantuzzo, J. W. ( 2012). Approaches to learning among Head Start alumni: Structure and validity of the Learning Behaviors Scale. School Psychology Review, 41( 3), 272-294.
13. Shapiro, E. S., & Gebhardt, S. N. ( 2012). Comparing computer-adaptive and curriculum-based measurement methods of assessment. School Psychology Review, 41( 3), 295-305.
14. Stiggins, R. ( 2005). From formative assessment to assessment FOR learning: A path to success in standardsbased schools. Phi Delia Kappan, 87, 324-328.
15. Swets, J. A., Dawes, R. M., & Monahan, J. ( 2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 1-26.
16. van den Broek, P., & Espin, C. A. ( 2012). Connecting cognitive theory and assessment: Measuring individual differences in reading comprehension. School Psychology Review, 41( 3), 315-325.
17. Volpe, R. J., & Briesch, A. M. ( 2012). Generalizability and dependability of single-item and multiple-item direct behavior rating scales for engagement and disruptive behavior. School Psychology Review, 41( 3), 246261.
18. Ysseldyke, J., Burns, M., Dawson, P., Kelley, B., Morrison, D., Ortiz, S., & Telzrow, C. ( 2006). School psychology: A blueprint for training and practice III. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.