Readability of texts: State of the art

Theory and Practice in Language Studies

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 43-53

  Zamanian, Mostafa ^a   Heydari, Pooneh ^a  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Comprehensibility; Readability; Readability formulas; Text variables; Validity of readability formulas

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868607254     PISSN: 17992591     EISSN: 20530692     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4304/tpls.2.1.43-53     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ardoin, S. P., Suldo, S. M., Witt, J., Ardrich, S., & McDonald, E. (2005). Accuracy of readability estimates' predictions of CBM performance [Electronic version]. School Psychology Quarterly, 20(1), 1-22. Retrieved December 23, 2007, from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=818687841&sid=2&Fmt=4&clientld=46449&RQT=309&VName=PQD
2. Bailin, A., & Grafstein, A. (2001). The linguistic assumptions underlying readability formulae: A critique. Language & Communication, 21, 285-301.
3. Bertram, B., & Newman, S. (1981). Why readability formulas fail (Report No. 28). Illinois University, Urbana: Center for the Study of Reading. (Eric Document Service No. ED205915)
4. Brown, J. D. (1998). An EFL readability index. JALT Journal, 20, 7-36.
5. Carrell, P. (1987). Readability in ESL. Reading in a Foreign Language, 4, 21-40.
6. Catalano, K. (1990). On the wire: How six news services are exceeding readability standards. Journalism Quarterly, 67(1), 97-103.
7. Chall, J. S. (1958). Readability: An appraisal of research and application. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Bureau of Educational Research.
8. Chall, J. S., & Dale, E. (1995). Readability revisited, the new Dale-Chall readability formula. Cambridge, MA: Bookline Books.
9. Chen, W. S. (1986). A comparison of seven computerized readability formulas as applied to elementary social studies textbooks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University College, U.S. Retrieved November 10, 2008, from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=771892981&sid=9&Fmt=4&clientld=46449&RQT=309&VName=PQD
10. Connaster, B. R. (1999). Last rites for readability formulas in technical communication [Electronic version]. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 29(3). Retrieved December 23, 2007, from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=46774455&sid=2&Ftm=2&clientld=46449&RQT=309&VName=PQD
11. Dale, E. & Chall, J. S. (1949). The concept of readability. Elementary English, 26, 23.
12. Davison, A., & Kantor, R. N. (1982). On the future of readability formulas to define readable texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 187-209.
13. Dreyer, L. G. (1984). Readability and responsibility. Journal of Reading, 32, 334-338.
14. Drury, A. (1985). Evaluating readability [Electronic version]. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC28(4), 11-15. Retrieved October 13, 2008, from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=11355684&sid=3&Fmt=4&clientld=46449&RQT=309&VName=PQD
15. DuBay, W. H. (2004). The principles of readability. Retrieved February 12, 2008, from http://www.nald.ca/fulltext/readab/readab.pdf
16. Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221-233.
17. Frase, L. T., Rubin, A., Starr, K., & Plung, D. L. (1981). Readability formulas: Used or abused? [Electronic version]. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC24 (1), 48-54. Retrieved December 23, 2007, from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1135513&sid=9&Ftm=2&clientld=46449&RQT=309&VName=PQD
18. Froese, V. (1971). Cloze readability versus the Dale-Chall formula. Paper presented at the Meeting of the International Reading Association, Atlantic City, NJ.
19. Fry, E. B. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11, 513-516.
20. Fry, E. B. (1989). Reading formulas-maligned but valid. Journal of Reading, 32 (4), 292-297.
21. Graesser, G. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 193-202.
22. Greenfield, G. R. (1999). Classic readability formulas in an EFL context: Are theyvalid for Japanese speakers? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Temple, U.S.
23. Gunning, R. (1952). The technique of clear writing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. Hamsik, M. J. (1984). Reading, readability, and the ESL reader. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Florida University, U.S. Retrieved December 23, 2007, from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=749006291&sid=1&ftm=2&clientld=46449&RQT=309&VName=PQD
25. Hargis, G. (2000). Readability and computer documentation. ACM Journal of Computer Documentation, 24(3), 122-131.
26. Hewitt, M. A., & Homan, S. P. (2004). Readability level of standardized test items and student performance: The forgotten validity variable [Electronic version]. Reading Research and Instruction, 43(2), 1-16. Retrieved December 23, 2007, from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=771892981&sid=9&Fmt=4&clientld=46449&RQT=309&VName=PQD
27. Jones, M. J., & Shoemaker, P. A. (1994). Accounting narratives: A review of empirical studies of content and readability. The Journal of Accounting Literature, 13, 142-184.
28. Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2002). Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition. Upper Saddle River: Printice-Hall.
29. Kern, R. P. (1979). Usefulness of readability formulas for achieving army readability objectives: Research and state-of-the-art applied to the army's problem. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http://www.rbainformationdesign.com.au/downloads/Readability%20Formulas.pdf
30. Kintsch, W. (1979). On modeling comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 14, 3-14.
31. Kirkwood, K. J., & Wolfe, R. G. (1980). Matching students and reading materials: A cloze-procedure method for assessing the reading ability of students and the readability of textual materials. Toronto: Ontario Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction in Service No. ED 195 928)
32. Kitson, H. D. (1921). The mind of the buyer. New York: Macmillan.
33. Klare, G. R. (1963). The measurement of readability. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
34. Klare, G. R. (1968). The role of the word frequency in readability. Elementary English, 45, 12-22.
35. Klare, G. R. (1974). Assessing readability. Reading Research Quarterly, 10, 62-102.
36. Klare, G. R. (1980). A manual for readable writing. Glen Burnie, MD: REM Company.
37. Kondur, J. (2006). Using part of speech structure of text in the prediction of its readability. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Texas, Arlington, U.S. Retrieved November 13, 2008, from http://proquest.umi.com/pdqweb?did=1216761731&sid=1&Fmt=2&clientld=46449&PQT=309&VName=PQD
38. Lively, B. A., & Pressey, S. L. (1923). A method for measuring the vocabulary burden of textbooks. Educational Administration and Supervision Including Teacher Training, 9, 389-398.
39. McClure, G. M. (1987). Readability formulas: Useful or useless? [Electronic version]. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC30(1), 12-16. Retrieved December 23, 2007, from http://proquest.umi.com/pdqweb?did=1135713&sid=9&Fmt=2&clientld=46449&PQT=309&VName=PQD
40. McLaughlin, G. H. (1969). SMOG grading: A new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 12(8), 639-646.
41. McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Graesser, A. C. (2002). Coh-Metrix: Automated cohesion and coherence scores to predict text readability and facilitate comprehension. Unpublished Grant proposal, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.
42. Mosenthal, P. B., & Kirsch, I. S. (1998). A new measure for assessing document complexity: The PMOSE/ IKIRSCH document readability formula. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 41(8), 638-658.
43. Powell, K. B., Barry, J. G., & Redish, J. C. (1981). Readability formulas: Used or abused? [Electronic version]. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC24(1), 43-48. Retrieved December 23, 2007, from http://proquest.umi.com/pdqweb?did=1135512&sid=9&Fmt=2&clientld=46449&PQT=309&VName=PQD
44. Rezaei, A. A. (2000). The validity of the "Fog-Index of Readability". Journal of Humanities of Islamic Republic of Iran, 7(4), 17-27.
45. Richards, J. C., Platt, J., & Platt, H. (1992). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. London: Longman.
46. Schriver, K. A. (1989). Evaluating text quality: The continuum from text-focused to reader-focused method. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32(4), 238-255.
47. Sharma, B. C. (1982). Graphic evaluation of readability scores [Electronic version]. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC25(1), 34-36. Retrieved December 23, 2007, from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1135550&sid=9&Fmt=2&clientld=46449&RQT=309&VName=PQD
48. Smith, F. (1982). Understanding reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
49. thed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
50. Thorndike, E. L. (1921). The teacher's workbook. New York, NY: Teacher's College, Columbia University.
51. Wait, S. S. (1987). Textbook readability and the predictive value of the Dale-Call, comprehensive assessment program, and cloze. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, U.S.
52. Wright, J. D. (1982). The effect of reduced readability text materials on comprehension and biology achievement. Science Education, 66, 3-13.