Bilateral ultrastaging of sentinel lymph node in cervical cancer: Lowering the false-negative rate and improving the detection of micrometastasis

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 127, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 462-466

  Cibula, David ^a   Abu Rustum, Nadeem R ^b   Dusek, Ladislav ^c   Slama, Jiri ^a   Zikán, Michal ^a   Zaal, Afra ^d   Sevcik, Libor ^e   Kenter, Gemma ^f   Querleu, Denis ^g   Jach, Robert ^h   Bats, Anne Sophie ⁱ   Dyduch, Grzegorz ^h   Graf, Peter ^e   Klat, Jaroslav ^e   Meijer, Chris J L M ^f   Mery, Eliane ^g   Verheijen, Rene ^d   Zweemer, Ronald P ^d  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^c MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OSTRAVA   (Czech Republic)

^f ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^g INSTITUT CLAUDIUS REGAUD   (France)

^h JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Poland)

ⁱ UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Sentinel lymph node; Staging

Indexed keywords

ADENOSQUAMOUS CARCINOMA; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICROMETASTASIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERUS CARCINOMA;

AGED; COHORT STUDIES; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM MICROMETASTASIS; NEOPLASM STAGING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84868569280     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: 10956859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.035     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. E.D. Euscher, A. Malpica, E.N. Atkinson, C.F. Levenback, M. Frumovitz, and M.T. Deavers Ultrastaging improves detection of metastases in sentinel lymph nodes of uterine cervix squamous cell carcinoma Am J Surg Pathol 32 2008 1336 1343
2. D. Cibula, N.R. Abu-Rustum, L. Dusek, M. Zikan, A. Zaal, and L. Sevcik Prognostic significance of low volume sentinel lymph node disease in early-stage cervical cancer Gynecol Oncol 124 2012 496 501
3. B. Cormier, J.P. Diaz, K. Shih, R.M. Sampson, Y. Sonoda, and K.J. Park Establishing a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm for the treatment of early cervical cancer Gynecol Oncol 122 2011 275 280
4. D. Cibula, D. Kuzel, J. Slama, D. Fischerova, P. Dundr, and P. Freitag Sentinel node (SLN) biopsy in the management of locally advanced cervical cancer Gynecol Oncol 115 2009 46 50
5. X.L. Du, X.G. Sheng, T. Jiang, Q. Li, H. Yu, and C. Pan Sentinel lymph node biopsy as guidance for radical trachelectomy in young patients with early stage cervical cancer BMC Cancer 11 2011 157
6. E. Barranger, C. Coutant, A. Cortez, S. Uzan, and E. Darai Sentinel node biopsy is reliable in early-stage cervical cancer but not in locally advanced disease Ann Oncol 16 2005 1237 1242
7. D. Wydra, S. Sawicki, S. Wojtylak, T. Bandurski, and J. Emerich Sentinel node identification in cervical cancer patients undergoing transperitoneal radical hysterectomy: a study of 100 cases Int J Gynecol Cancer 16 2006 649 654
8. L. Rob, M. Charvata, H. Robova, P. Strnad, M. Pluta, and M. Halaska Sentinel lymph node identification (SLNI) in the management of conservative surgery in early cervical cancer: is it acceptable? Gynecol Oncol 99 2005 S147 S148
9. R. Angioli, I. Palaia, C. Cipriani, L. Muzii, M. Calcagno, and G. Gullotta Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure in cervical cancer: a critical point of view Gynecol Oncol 96 2005 504 509
10. C. Altgassen, H. Hertel, A. Brandstadt, C. Kohler, M. Durst, and A. Schneider Multicenter validation study of the sentinel lymph node concept in cervical cancer: AGO Study Group J Clin Oncol 26 2008 2943 2951
11. F. Lecuru, P. Mathevet, D. Querleu, E. Leblanc, P. Morice, and E. Darai Bilateral negative sentinel nodes accurately predict absence of lymph node metastasis in early cervical cancer: results of the SENTICOL study J Clin Oncol 29 2011 1686 1691
12. G.F. Schwartz, A.E. Giuliano, and U. Veronesi Proceedings of the consensus conference on the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in carcinoma of the breast, April 19-22, 2001, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Cancer 94 2002 2542 2551
13. SPSS. SPSS for Windows. In. 12.0.1.2003 ed. Chicago; 2003.
14. R.G. Newcombe Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods Stat Med 17 1998 857 872
15. M. Plante, M.C. Renaud, B. Tetu, F. Harel, and M. Roy Laparoscopic sentinel node mapping in early-stage cervical cancer Gynecol Oncol 91 2003 494 503
16. C. Coutant, O. Morel, Y. Delpech, S. Uzan, E. Darai, and E. Barranger Laparoscopic sentinel node biopsy in cervical cancer using a combined detection: 5-years experience Ann Surg Oncol 14 2007 2392 2399
17. N. Patani, and K. Mokbel The clinical significance of sentinel lymph node micrometastasis in breast cancer Breast Cancer Res Treat 114 2009 393 402
18. P.J. van Diest, M. de Boer, C.H. van Deurzen, and V.C. Tjan-Heijnen Micrometastases and isolated tumor cells in breast cancer are indeed associated with poorer outcome J Clin Oncol 28 2010 e140 author reply e141-2
19. E. Darai, R. Rouzier, M. Ballester, E. Barranger, and C. Coutant Sentinel lymph node biopsy in gynaecological cancers: the importance of micrometastases in cervical cancer Surg Oncol 17 2008 227 235
20. D. Cibula, I. Pinkavova, L. Dusek, J. Slama, M. Zikan, and D. Fischerova Local control after tailored surgical treatment of early cervical cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 21 4 2011 May 690 698
21. M. Höckel, L.C. Horn, N. Manthey, U.D. Braumann, U. Wolf, and G. Teichmann Resection of the embryologically defined uterovaginal (Müllerian) compartment and pelvic control in patients with cervical cancer: a prospective analysis Lancet Oncol 10 7 2009 Jul 683 692