|
Volumn 29, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 460-461
|
How can we explain the gap between randomised studies and 'real life' practice in postoperative transfusion triggers Do we need to change recommended thresholds for transfusion
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
HEMOGLOBIN;
ANEMIA;
ANESTHESIA COMPLICATION;
ANESTHESIOLOGICAL PROCEDURE;
ANESTHETIC RECOVERY;
BLEEDING;
BLOOD BANK;
BLOOD TRANSFUSION;
CAUSE OF DEATH;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
CLINICAL RESEARCH;
CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT;
EDITORIAL;
ELECTIVE SURGERY;
ERYTHROCYTE TRANSFUSION;
HEART INFARCTION;
HEMOGLOBIN DETERMINATION;
HIP FRACTURE;
HUMAN;
ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE;
KIDNEY FAILURE;
LABORATORY TEST;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MEDICAL DEVICE;
MORTALITY;
ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY;
PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
POINT OF CARE TESTING;
POSTOPERATIVE CARE;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);
SURGICAL PATIENT;
ANESTHESIA;
BLOOD TRANSFUSION;
ERYTHROCYTES;
HEMORRHAGE;
HUMANS;
INTENSIVE CARE;
KINETICS;
POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;
RISK;
VIRUS DISEASES;
|
EID: 84868540222
PISSN: 02650215
EISSN: 13652346
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328356073c Document Type: Editorial |
Times cited : (9)
|
References (8)
|