Erratum: Expert judgments about RD&D and the future of nuclear energy (Environmental Science and Technology (2012) 41:21 (11497?11504) DOI: 10.1021/es300612c);Expert judgments about RD&D and the future of nuclear energy

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 46, Issue 21, 2012, Pages 11497-11504

  Anadón, Laura D ^a   Bosetti, Valentina ^b   Bunn, Matthew ^a   Catenacci, Michela ^b   Lee, Audrey ^a,c  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FONDAZIONE ENI ENRICO MATTEI   (Italy)

^c SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSTS; HIGH TEMPERATURE REACTORS; NUCLEAR ENERGY; SMALL NUCLEAR REACTORS; SODIUM-COOLED FAST REACTORS; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

FUTURE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY; GOVERNMENT SUPPORTS; IMPROVE PERFORMANCE; NUCLEAR ENERGY SYSTEMS; NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY; PROBABILISTIC ESTIMATES; SMALL MODULAR REACTORS; URANIUM RESOURCES;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

FUEL; SODIUM; URANIUM;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EXPERT SYSTEM; FUTURE PROSPECT; NUCLEAR POWER; NUCLEAR POWER PLANT; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PROBABILITY; RESOURCE USE; SAFETY; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; URANIUM; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ARTICLE; COST; FUNDING; GOVERNMENT; NUCLEAR ENERGY; REACTOR; RESEARCH; SAFETY; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84868538635     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es402904s     Document Type: Erratum

References (39)

1. Clarke, L.; Edmonds, J.; Krey, V.; Richels, R.; Rose, S.; Tavoni, M. International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios Energy Economics 2009, 31, S64-S81 Database.
2. Edenhofer, O.; Carraro, C.; Hourcade, J.-C.; Neuhoff, K.; Luderer, G.; Flachsland, C.; Jakob, M.; Popp, A.; Steckel, J.; Strohschein, J.; Bauer, N.; Brunner, S.; Leimbach, M.; Lotze-Campen, H.; Bosetti, V.; de Cian, E.; Tavoni, M; Sassi, O.; Waisman, H.; Crassous-Doerfler, R.; Monjon, S.; Dröge, S.; van Essen, H.; del Río, P.; Türk, A. RECIPE-The Economics of Decarbonization. Report on Energy and Climate Policy in Europe. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Centro Euro-Mediterraneo per I Cambiamenti Climatici, Centre International de Recherche sur lEnvironnement et le Développement, and Electricity Policy Research Group, 2009.
3. Goldston, R. J. Climate change, nuclear energy and nuclear proliferation: Magnitude matters Sci. Global Secur. 2011, 19 (2) 130-165
4. IAEA. Power Reactor Information System; International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna, Austria, 2011.
5. Bunn, M.; Malin, M. B. Enabling a nuclear revival-and managing its risks Innovations 2009, 4 (4) 173-191
6. Grübler, A.; Nakicenovic, N.; Victor, D. G. Dynamics of energy technologies and global change Energy Policy 1999, 27, 247-280
7. National Research Council. Prospective Evaluation of Applied Energy Research and Development at Doe (Phase Two); The National Academies Press: Washington DC, 2007.
8. Morgan, M. G.; Henrion, M. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis; Cambridge University Press: New York, 1990.
9. Cooke, R. Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science; Oxford University Press: New York, United States, 1991.
10. OHagan, A.; Buck, C. E.; Daneshkhan, A.; Eiser, J. R.; Garthwaite, P. H.; Jenkinson, D. J.; Oakey, J. E.; Rakow, T. Uncertain Judgments: Eliciting Experts Probabilities. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, U.K., 2006.
11. Keith, D. W. When is it appropriate to combine expert judgments? Clim. Change 1996, 33, 139-144
12. Clemen, R. T.; Reilly, T. Making Hard Decisions with Decision Tools, Duxbury Thomson Learning; Pacific Grove, CA 2001.
13. Keeney, R. L.; von Winterfeldt, D. Eliciting probabilities from experts in complex technical problems IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 1991, 38, 191-201
14. Meyer, M. A.; Booker, J. M. Eliciting and Analyzing Expert Judgment: A Practical Guide; Academic Press Ldt: London, U.K., 1991.
15. Phillips, L. D. Group elicitation of probability distributions: Are many heads better than one? In Decision Science and Technology: Reactions on the Contributions of Ward Edwards; Shanteau, J.; Mellers, B.; Schum, D. A., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Norwell, MA, 1999.
16. Walls, L.; Quigley, J. Building prior distributions to support Bayesian reliability growth modelling using expert judgement Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2001, 74, 117-128
17. Dalkey, N. C. The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion, RAND Report #RM-5888-PR; Rand Co.: Santa Monica, CA, 1969.
18. Baker, E.; Chon, H.; Keisler, J. Advanced Nuclear Power: Combining Economic Analysis with Expert Elicitations to Inform Climate Policy, 2008, SSRN-id1407048
19. Baker, E.; Chon, H.; Keisler, J. Carbon capture and storage: Combining expert elicitations to inform climate policy Clim. Change 2009, 96 (3) 379-408
20. Baker, E.; Keisler, J. M. Cellulosic biofuels: Expert views on prospects for advancement Energy 2011, 36, 595-605
21. Curtright, A. E.; Morgan, M. G.; Keith, D. W. Expert assessments of future photovoltaic technologies Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 9031-9039
22. Chan, G.; Anadon, L. D.; Chan, M.; Lee, A. Expert elicitation of cost, performance, and RD&D budgets for coal power with CCS Energy Procedia 2011, 4, 2685-2692
23. IPCC. Fourth Assessment Report; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, United States, 2007.
24. IPCC. Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation; Edenhofer, O.; Pichs-Madruga, R.; Sokona, Y.; Seyboth, K.; Matschoss, K.; Kadner, S.; Zwickel, T.; Eickemeier, P.; Hansen, G.; Schloemer, S.; von Stechow, C., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2011.
25. Roman, H. A.; Walker, K. D.; Walsh, T. L.; Conner, L.; Richmond, H. M.; Hubbell, B. J.; Kinney, P. L. Expert judgment assessment of the mortality impact of changes in ambient fine particulate matter in the U.S Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42 (7) 2268-2274
26. Burman, M. A. Environmental Risk and Decision Analysis: For Conservation and Natural Resource Management; Cambridge University Press: London, U.K., 2005.
27. Hora, S. C. Probability judgments for continuous quantities Manage. Sci. 2004, 50 (5) 597-604
28. Zickfeld, K.; Morgan, M. G.; Frame, D. J.; Keith, D. W. Expert judgments about transient climate response to alternative future trajectories of radiative forcing Proce. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107, 12451-12456
29. Du, Y.; Parsons, J. E. Update on the Cost of Nuclear Power, Report 09-004; MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research: Cambridge, MA, May 2009.
30. Koomey, J.; Hultman, E. A reactor level analysis of busbar costs for U.S. nuclear plants, 1979-2005 Energy Policy 2007, 35, 5630-5642
31. Grübler, A. The costs of the French nuclear scale-up: A case of negative learning by doing Energy Policy 2011, 38 (9) 5174-5188
32. Shropshire, D. E.; Williams, K. A.; Hoffman, E. A.; Smith, J. D.; Hebditch, D. J.; Jacobson, J. J.; Morton, J. D.; Phillips, A. M.; Taylor, J. P. Advanced Fuel Cycle economic analysis of symbiotic light-water reactor and fast burner reactor systems. Technical Report from the Idaho National Laboratory, ocument INL/EXT-09-15254; U.S. Department of Energy: Washington DC, January, 2009.
33. Evenson, R. E. International invention: Implications for technology market analysis. In R&D, Patents and Productivity Zvi, G., Ed.; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, United States, 1984.
34. Evenson, R. E.; Kisleve, Y. A stochastic model for applied research J. Political Econ. 1976, 84, 265-281
35. Kortum, S. Research, patenting, and technological change Econometrica 1997, 65 (6) 1389-1419
36. Segerstrom, P. S. Endogenous Growth without Scale Effects American Economic Review 1998, 88 (5) 1290-1310
37. Bosch, M.; Lederman, D.; Maloney, W. F. Patenting and Research and Development: A Global View; The World Bank: Washington DC, 2005.
38. Plous, S. The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1993.
39. Cochran, T. B.; Feiveson, H. A.; Patterson, W.; Pshakin, G.; Ramana, M. V.; Schneider, M.; Suzuki, T.; von Hippel, F. Fast Breeder Reactor Programs: History and Status, Research Report #8. International Panel on Fissile Materials. Princeton Universitys Program on Science and Global Security. Princeton, NJ, February, 2010.