Climate change, nuclear power, and nuclear proliferation: Magnitude matters

Science and Global Security

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 130-165

  Goldston, Robert J ^a  

^a PRINCETON PLASMA PHYSICS LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRICAL ENERGY; ENERGY SOURCE; FUSION ENERGY; INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT; LOW-CARBON; MINOR ACTINIDE; NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION; PROLIFERATION RISKS; REACTOR TECHNOLOGY; RISK MITIGATION; STOCKS AND FLOWS;

NUCLEAR ENERGY; PLUTONIUM; URANIUM;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

EID: 79960882397     PISSN: 08929882     EISSN: 15477800     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08929882.2011.589223     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. R. H. Williams and H. A. Feiveson, "Diversion-Resistance Criteria for Future Nuclear Power, " Energy Policy July/August (1990): 543.
2. H. Feiveson, Nuclear Proliferation and Diversion, Elsevier Encyclopedia of Energy 4 (Amsterdam: Elsevier, Acad. Press, 2004).
3. E. Schneider and W. C. Sailor, "Nuclear Fission, " Science & Global Security 14 (2006): 183.
4. H. Feiveson, A. Glaser, M. Miller, and L. Scheinman, "Can Future Nuclear Power Be Made Proliferation Resistant?" CISSM Working Paper, Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland, University of Maryland (July 2008).
5. R. H. Socolow and A. Glaser, "Balancing Risks: Nuclear Energy & Climate Change, " Daedalus, Fall (2009).
6. A. Feiveson, Civilian Nuclear Power in a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World, in B. M. Blechman and A. K. Bollfrass, Elements of a Nuclear Disarmament Treaty (Washington, D.C.: Henry L. Stimson Center, 2010).
7. 2 Emissions Mitigation, " Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 7 (2006): 175.
8. L. Clarke, J. Edmonds, V. Krey, R. Richels, S. Rose, and M. Tavoni, "International Climate Policy Architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios, " Energy Economics 31 (2009): S64.
9. One model appeared to have a miscalibration, providing results for year 2000 electricity production low by more than by a factor of three, and was not included (accessed 7 December 2009).
10. J. B. Blanford, R. G. Richels, and T. E. Rutherford, "Feasible Climate Targets: The Roles of Economic Growth, Coalition Development and Expectations, " Energy Economics 31 (2009): S82.
11. 2 Equivalent in the 21st Century, " Energy Economics 31 (2009): S107.
12. K. Calvin, P. Patel, A. Fawcett, L. Clarke, K. Fisher-Vanden, J. Edmonds, S. H. Kim, R. Sands, and M. Wise, "The Distribution and Magnitude of Emissions Mitigation Costs in Climate Stabilization under Less Than Perfect International Cooperation: SGM Results, " Energy Economics 31 (2009): S187.
13. A. Gurney, H. Ahammad, and M. Ford, "The Economics of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation: Insights from Illustrative Global Abatement Modelling, " Energy Economics 31 (2009): S174.
14. V. Krey and K. Riahi, "Implications of Delayed Participation and Technology Failure for the Feasibility, Costs, and Likelihood of Staying Below Temperature Targets-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Scenarios for the 21st Century, " Energy Economics 31 (2009): S94.
15. R. Loulou, M. Labriet, and A. Kanudia, "Deterministics and Stochastic Analysis of Alternative Climate Targets under Differentiated Cooperation Regimes, " Energy Economics 31 (2009): S131.
16. P. Russ and T. van Ierland, "Insights on Different Participation Schemes to Meet Climate Goals, " Energy Economics 31 (2009): S163.
17. J. van Vliet, M. G. J. den Elzen, and D. P. van Vuuren, "Meeting Radiative Forcing Targets under Delayed Participation, " Energy Economics 31 2009: S152.
18. S. H. Kim and J. Edmonds, "The Challenges and Potential of Nuclear Energy for Addressing Climate Change, " Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PNNL-17037 (2007).
19. S. H. Kim and J. Edmonds, "The Potential of Nuclear Energy for Addressing Climate Change, " GNEP-SYSA-PMO-MI-DV-2008-000179 (2008).
20. MiniCam has now been renamed GCAM, http://www.globalchange.umd.edu/ models/minicam/.
21. An electric power equivalent of nuclear production of hydrogen is included in this total value for a very few of the models. The contribution is small relative to the nuclear electricity produced even in those cases; personal communication, L. E. Clarke, 2010.
22. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, World Meteorological Organization, and United Nations Environment Programme, "IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage final draft, " WMO; United Nations Environment Programme, http://www.ipcc.ch/activity/srccs/index.htm.
23. 9s, of metric tonnes.
24. Using the 3-reservoir model in the RICE-99 spreadsheet, http://www.econ. yale.edu/%7Enordhaus/homepage/dice section V.html (accessed on 25 January 2010).
25. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report: Summary for Policymakers (2007).
26. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007, Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report: Summary for Policymakers.
27. 2 Emissions Mitigation and Technological Advance: An Analysis of Advanced Technology Scenarios (Scenarios Updated January 2009), " Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PNNL-18075 (2008).
28. The on-line appendix to "Climate Change, Nuclear Power and Nuclear Proliferation: Magnitude Matters" can be found at http://www.princeton.edu/sgs/ publications/sgs/archive.
29. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, World Meteorological Organization, and United Nations Environment Programme, "IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage final draft, " WMO; United Nations Environment Programme, http://www.ipcc.ch/activity/srccs/index.htm.
30. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, World Meteorological Organization, and United Nations Environment Programme, "IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage final draft, " WMO; United Nations Environment Programme, http://www.ipcc.ch/activity/srccs/index.htm.
31. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, "The Future of Coal, " (2007).
32. R. H. Socolow, "Can We Bury Global Warming?" Scientific American July (2005): 33-40.
33. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, World Meteorological Organization, and United Nations Environment Programme, "IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage final draft, " WMO; United Nations Environment Programme, http://www.ipcc.ch/activity/srccs/index.htm.
34. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, "The Future of Coal, " (2007).
35. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2007 Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group III Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
36. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, World Meteorological Organization, and United Nations Environment Programme, "IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage final draft, " WMO; United Nations Environment Programme, http://www.ipcc.ch/activity/srccs/index.htm.
37. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007, Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report: Summary for Policymakers.
38. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, "The Future of Geothermal Energy, " (2006).
39. J. Traube, L. Hansen, B. Palmintier, and J. Levine, "Spatial and Temporal Interactions of Wind and Solar in the Next Generation Utility, " Presented at WINDPOWER 2008 Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas (3 June 2008).
40. U.S. Department of Energy, "20%Wind Energy by 2030: IncreasingWind Energy's Contribution to U.S. Electricity Supply, " DOE/G0-102008-3567 (July 2008).
41. A. Reeves and F. Beck, "Wind Energy for Electric Power, " Renewable Energy Policy Project (July 2003).
42. 2 Emissions Mitigation and Technological Advance: An Analysis of Advanced Technology Scenarios (Scenarios Updated January 2009), " Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PNNL-18075 (2008).
43. DESERTEC Foundation, http://www.desertec.org.
44. International Atomic Energy Agency, 2005b. Thorium Fuel cycle-Potential Benefits and Challenges, IAEA-TECDOC-1450 (May 2005).
45. H. Feiveson, Nuclear Proliferation and Diversion, Elsevier Encyclopedia of Energy 4 (Amsterdam: Elsevier, Acad. Press, 2004).
46. H. Feiveson, A. Glaser, M. Miller, and L. Scheinman, "Can Future Nuclear Power Be Made Proliferation Resistant?" CISSM Working Paper, Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland, University of Maryland (July 2008).
47. H. Feiveson, A. Glaser, M. Miller, and L. Scheinman, "Can Future Nuclear Power Be Made Proliferation Resistant?" CISSM Working Paper, Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland, University of Maryland (July 2008).
48. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, and International Atomic Energy Agency, Uranium 2007: Resources, Production and Demand (Paris: Nuclear Energy Agency, 2008).
49. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, and International Atomic Energy Agency, Forty Years of Uranium Resources, Production and Demand in Perspective: "The Red Book Retrospective" (Paris: OECD, 2006).
50. K. S. Deffeyes and L. D. MacGregor, "World Uranium Resources, " Scientific American January (1980): 66.
51. E. A. Schneider and W. C. Sailor, "Long-Term Uranium Supply Estimates, " Nuclear Technology 162 (2008): 379.
52. N. Seko, A. Katakai, S. Hasegawa, M. Tamada, N. Kasai, H. Takeda, T. Sugo, and K. Saito, "Aquaculture of Uranium in Seawater by a Fabric-adsorbent Submerged System, " Nuclear Technology 144 (2003): 274.
53. D. Albright and L. Barbour, "Separated Neptunium 237 and Americium, " in The Challenges of Fissile Material Control, D. Albright and K. O'Neill, eds., Institute of Science and International Security Reports (1999).
54. Gen IV International Forum, The Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection Evaluation Methodology Expert Group of the Generation IV International Forum, "Methodology for Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection, Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems, " GIF/PRPPWF/2006/005 (2006).
55. The 61 nations are: Albania, Algeria, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Belarus, Chile, Ecuador, Egypt, Estonia, Georgia, Ghana, Gulf states, Indonesia, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Libya, Malaysia, Mongolia, Morocco, Namibia, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Syria, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Venezuela, Vietnam, and Yemen.
56. International Atomic Energy Agency, "International Status and Prospects of Nuclear Power, Report by the Director General, " GOV/INF/2010/12-GC(54)/INF/5 (2 September 2010).
57. International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA Safeguards Glossary, International Nuclear Verification Series, No. 3, 2001 Edition (Vienna: IAEA, 2002) 19.
58. "Reactor-grade" plutonium that emerges with a mixture of plutonium isotopes from LWRs is considered by the IAEA to be adequate for the production of nuclear explosives. Only mixtures with greater than 80 percent Plutonium-238 are excluded, and since plutonium is dominantly produced and transmuted by neutron capture starting from Uranium-238, little Plutonium-238 is available in the nuclear fuel cycle.
59. M. Benedict, T. Pigford, and H.W. Levi, Nuclear Chemical Engineering (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981) 667.
60. V. Gilinsky, M. Miller, and H. Hubbard, "A Fresh Examination of the Proliferation Dangers of Light Water Reactors, " The Nonproliferation Policy Education Center (2004).
61. A. Glaser, "Characteristics of Gas Centrifuges for Uranium Enrichment and Their Relevance for Nuclear Weapon Proliferation, " Science & Global Security 16 (2008): 1.
62. V. Gilinsky, M., Miller, H. Hubbard, "A Fresh Examination of the Proliferation Dangers of Light Water Reactors, " The Nonproliferation Policy Education Center (2004).
63. R. H. Socolow and A. Glaser, "Balancing Risks: Nuclear Energy & Climate Change, " Daedalus, Fall (2009).
64. A. Glaser, "The Civilian Nuclear Fuel Cycle in a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World: Challenges and Opportunities, " in B. M. Blechman, and A. K. Bollfrass, Elements of a Nuclear Disarmament Treaty (Washington, D.C.: Henry L. Stimson Center, 2010).
65. International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA Safeguards Glossary, International Nuclear Verification Series, No. 3, 2001 Edition (Vienna: IAEA, 2002), p. 43.
66. R. Bari, "Framework for Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection for Nonproliferation Impact Assessments, " Brookhaven National Laboratory Formal Report, BNL-80083 (March 2008).
67. Gen IV International Forum, The Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection Evaluation Methodology Expert Group of the Generation IV International Forum, "Methodology for Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection, Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems, " GIF/PRPPWF/2006/005 (2006).
68. National Nuclear Security Administration, Office of Nonproliferation and International Security, "Draft Nonproliferation Impact Assessment for the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Programmatic Alternatives, " (December 2008).
69. J. C. Mark, "Explosive Properties of Reactor-Grade Plutonium, " Science & Global Security 4 (1993): 111.
70. National Nuclear Security Administration, Office of Nonproliferation and International Security, "Draft Nonproliferation Impact Assessment for the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Programmatic Alternatives, " (December 2008).
71. R. L. Garwin, "Reactor-Grade Plutonium Can be Used to Make Powerful and Reliable Nuclear Weapons: Separated Plutonium in the Fuel Cycle Must be Protected as if it Were Nuclear Weapons. " The Garwin Archive, Federation of American Scientists (26 August 1998).
72. V. Gilinsky, M. Miller, and H. Hubbard, "A Fresh Examination of the Proliferation Dangers of Light Water Reactors, " The Nonproliferation Policy Education Center (2004).
73. U.S. Department of Energy, Final Nonproliferation and Arms Control Assessment of Weapons-usable Fissile Material Storage and Excess Plutonium Disposition Alternatives (Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Energy, Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation, 1987).
74. L. V. Sigal and J. Wit, "North Korea's Perspectives on the Global Elimination of Nuclear Weapons, " in B. Blechman, Unblocking the Read to Zero (Washington, D.C.: Henry L. Stimson Center, 2009).
75. A. Ehteshami, "Iranian Perspectives on the Global Elimination of Nuclear Weapons, " in B. Blechman, Unblocking the Read to Zero, (Washington, D.C.: Henry L. Stimson Center, 2009).
76. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, Office of Fuel Cycle Management, "Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Strategic Plan, " GNEP-167312 (December 2006) http://www.westgov.org/wieb/meetings/hlwsprg2007/briefing/GNEPsplan.pdf.
77. International Atomic Energy Agency, "Multilateral Approaches to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Expert Group Report Submitted to the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, " INFCIRC 640 (22 February 2005).
78. n = 4A/(A+1)2, where A is the atomic number of the target nucleus. For A » 1 this becomes small. The hydrogen in water is very effective at reducing neutron energy.
79. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, "The Future of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, Summary Report, " (2010).
80. Generation IV International Forum, (2009), http://www.gen-4.org.
81. S. M. Piet, B. W, Dixon, J. J. Jacobson, G. E. Matthern, and D. E. Shropshire, "Lessons Learned from Dynamic Simulations of Advanced Fuel Cycles, " Proceedings of Global 2009, The Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Sustainable Options and Industrial Perspectives, Paris, France (6-11 September 2009).
82. E. A. Hoffman, W. S. Yang, and R. N. Hill, "Preliminary Core Design Studies for the Advanced Burner Reactor over a Wide Range of Conversion Ratios, " Argonne National Laboratory, ANL-AFCI-177 (29 September 2006).
83. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, Science, and Technology, "Report to Congress-Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative: Objectives, Approach, and Technology Summary" (May 2005).
84. B. Dixon, B. Halsey, S. Kim, G. Matthern, S. Piet, and D. Shropshire, "Dynamic Systems Analysis Report for Nuclear Fuel Recycle, " Idaho National Laboratory, AFCISYSA-AI-SS-RT-2009-000053 (December 2008).
85. S. M. Piet, B. W, Dixon, J. J. Jacobson, G. E. Matthern, and D. E. Shropshire, "Lessons Learned from Dynamic Simulations of Advanced Fuel Cycles, " Proceedings of Global 2009, The Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Sustainable Options and Industrial Perspectives, Paris, France (6-11 September 2009).
86. R. A. Wigeland, T. H. Bauer, T. H. Fanning, and E. E. Morris, "Separations and Transmutation Criteria to Improve Utilization of a Geologic Repository, " Nuclear Technology 154 (2006): 95.
87. International Atomic Energy Agency, Scientific and Technical Basis for Geological Disposal of Radioactive Wastes (Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2003), 6.
88. S. Piet, T. Bjornard, B. Dixon, D. Gombert, C. Laws, and G. Matthern, "Which Elements Should be Recycled for a Comprehensive Fuel Cycle?" Proceedings of Global 2007 Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Systems, Boise, Idaho (9-13 September 2007).
89. S. M. Piet, B. W, Dixon, J. J. Jacobson, G. E. Matthern, and D. E. Shropshire, "Lessons Learned from Dynamic Simulations of Advanced Fuel Cycles, " Proceedings of Global 2009, The Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Sustainable Options and Industrial Perspectives, Paris, France (6-11 September 2009).
90. International Atomic Energy Agency, Scientific and Technical Basis for Geological Disposal of Radioactive Wastes (Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2003), 6.
91. International Panel on Fissile Materials, Global Fissile Material Report 2009, Princeton, N.J. (2009).
92. J. Kang and F. von Hippel "Limited Proliferation-Resistance Benefits from Recycling Unseparated Transuranics and Lanthanides from Light-Water Reactor Spent Fuel, " Science & Global Security 13 (2005): 169.
93. International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA Safeguards Glossary, International Nuclear Verification Series, No. 3, 2001 Edition (Vienna: IAEA, 2002), p. 43.
94. W. J. Nutall, "Fusion as an Energy Source: Challenges and Opportunities. " Institute of Physics Report, (September 2008).
95. F. von Hippel and R. J. Goldston, Nuclear Energy, Fusion in Global Energy Assessment, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, in press.
96. R. J. Hawryluk, "Review of DT Experiments Relevant to Burning Plasma Issues, " Journal of Plasma Fusion Research SERIES 5 (2002): 12.
97. M. Moyer, "Fusion's False Dawn, " Scientific American March (2010): 52.
98. R. Hazeltine, M. Porkolab, S. Prager, and R. Stambaugh, "Letter to the Editor, " Scientific American July (2010).
99. D. Maisonnier, I. Cook, P. Sardain, L. Boccaccini, E. Bogusch, K. Brodin, L. Di Pace, R. Forrest, G. Luciano, S. Hermsmeyer, C. Nardi, P. Norajitra, A. Pizzuto, N. Taylor, and D. Ward, "The European Power Plant Conceptual Study, " Fusion Engineering and Design 75-79 (2005): 1173.
100. F. Najmabadi and the ARIES Team, "The ARIES-AT Advanced Tokamak, Advanced Technology Fusion Power Plant, " Fusion Engineering and Design 80 (2006): 3.
101. Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee, "A Plan for the Development of Fusion Energy, Final Report to FESAC" (March 2003).
102. U.S. Burning Plasma Organization, "Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences, Report of the Research NeedsWorkshop (ReNeW), " Bethesda, Maryland (8-12 June 2009).
103. R. J. Goldston, A. Glaser, and A. F. Ross, "Proliferation Risks of Fusion Energy: Clandestine Production, Covert Production, and Breakout, " 9th IAEA Technical Meeting on Fusion Power Plant Safety, Vienna, Austria (15-17 July 2009).
104. M. B. Kalinowski and L. C. Colschen, "International Control of Tritium to Prevent Horizontal Proliferation and to Foster Nuclear Disarmament, " Science and Global Security 5 (1995): 131.
105. R. E. Rowberg, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, "The Department of Energy's Tritium Production Program, " RL30425 (8 November 2001).
106. U.S. Energy Department, "The National Ignition Facility (NIF) and the Issue of Nonproliferation" U.S. Energy Department Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation, DOE/NN-96007377 (19 December 1995), http://www.osti.gov/news/docs/ nif/front.htm.
107. R. J. Goldston and A. Glaser, "Inertial Confinement Fusion Energy R&D and Nuclear Proliferation: The Need for Direct and Transparent Review, " Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 87 (2011):59.
108. J. Freidberg and P. Finck, "Research Needs for Fusion-Fission Hybrids, Report of the Research Needs Workshop (ReNeW), " (30 January 2010), http://web.mit.edu/fusionfission/.
109. W. M. Stacey, "Georgia Tech Studies of Sub-Critical Advanced Burner Reactors with a D-T Fusion Tokamak Neutron Source for the Transmutation of Spent Nuclear Fuel, " Journal of Fusion Energy 28 (2009): 328.