Agreement between Bayley Scales second and third edition assessments of very low-birth-weight infants

Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

Volumn 166, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1075-1076

  Silveira, Rita C ^a   Filipouski, Gabriela R ^a   Goldstein, Donald J ^b   O'Shea, T Michael ^b   Procianoy, Renato S ^a  

^a HOSPITAL DE CLÍNICAS DE PORTO ALEGRE   (Brazil)

^b WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYLEY SCALES OF INFANT DEVELOPMENT; BIRTH WEIGHT; COGNITION; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; INFANT; LANGUAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL DEVELOPMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR DEVELOPMENT; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SURVIVAL RATE; VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT;

CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; INFANT, VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS;

EID: 84868530598     PISSN: 10724710     EISSN: 15383628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.732     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development. 2nd ed. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp; 1993.
2. Bayley N. Technical Manual of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment Inc; 2006.
3. Acton BV, Biggs WSG, Creighton DE, et al. Overestimating neurodevelopment using the Bayley-III after early complex cardiac surgery. Pediatrics. 2011;128(4):e794-e800.
4. Lowe JR, Erickson SJ, Schrader R, Duncan AF. Comparison of the Bayley II Mental Developmental Index and the Bayley III Cognitive Scale: are we measuring the same thing? Acta Paediatr. 2012;101(2):e55-e58.
5. Moore T, Johnson S, Haider S, Hennessy E, Marlow N. Relationship between test scores using the second and third editions of the Bayley Scales in extremely preterm children. J Pediatr. 2012;160(4):553-558.
6. Msall ME. Measuring outcomes after extreme prematurity with the Bayley-III Scales of infant and toddler development: a cautionary tale from Australia. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(4):391-393.