A multidimensional PageRank algorithm of literatures

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 308-315

  Yu, Kun ^a   Chen, Xiaobing ^a   Chen, Jianhong ^a  

^a HUAIYIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Impact Factor; Literature Evaluation; PangRank; Reputation Evaluating

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS;

CENTRALIZED ALGORITHMS; COMMUNICATION COST; COMPLEX RELATIONSHIPS; CONVERGENCE CONDITIONS; EVALUATION ALGORITHM; EVALUATION SCHEME; GOOGLE PAGERANK; IMPACT FACTOR; ITS EVALUATION; LITERATURE DATABASE; LITERATURE EVALUATION; P2P SYSTEM; PAGERANK; PAGERANK ALGORITHM; PANGRANK; REPUTATION EVALUATING;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84868525767     PISSN: 19928645     EISSN: 18173195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Slavin. R. E, Cooperative learning: Theory research and practice (Boston Ally & Bacon,1995).
2. Kumara. V. S, Assessing process in CSCL: An ontological approach, Computers in human behavior, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 825-834, 2010.
3. Abdul-Rahman. A, Hailes. S, Supporting trust in virtual communities, Proceedings Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Page: 4-7 Year of Publication: 2000 ISBN: 0-7695-0493-0).
4. Marsh. S, Formalising Trust as a computational concept, PhD Thesis, Dept. of Math. and Comp., University of Stirling, UK, 1994.
5. Kaltenborn. KF, Kuhn. K, The journal impact factor as a parameter for the evaluation of researchers and research, Rev Esp Enferm Dig, Vol. 98, No. 3, pp. 153-169, 2003.
6. Brumback. RA, "Worshiping false idols: The impact factor dilemma": Correcting the record, Journal of Child Neurology, Vol. 23, No. 9, pp. 1092-1094, 2008.
7. Castelnuovo. G, Limonta. D, A More Comprehensive Index in the Evaluation of Scientific Research: The Single Researcher Impact Factor Proposal, Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 109-114, 2010.
8. Graczynski MR, Personal impact factor: the need for speed, Med Sci Monit, Vol. 14, No. 10, pp. ED1-2, 2008.
9. http://www.researcherid. com/
10. Banks. M. A, Dellavalle. R, Emerging alternatives to the impact factor, OCLC Systems Services, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 167-173, 2008.
11. Soualmia. LF, Darmoni. SJ, Web impact factor: a bibliometric criterion applied to medical informatics societies' web sites, Stud Health Technol Inform, No. 90, pp. 178-183, 2002.
12. Page. L, Brin. S, Motwani. R, and Winograd. T, The Pagerank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web, Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, 1998.
13. Srivastava. J, Cooley. R, Deshpande. M, Tan. P, Web Usage Mining: Discovery and Applications of Usage Patterns from Web Data, SIGKDD Explorations, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 12-23,2000.
14. Bollen. J, Rodrigues. MA, PageRank for impact ranking, Scientometrics, vol. 69, n. 3, pp. 669-687, 2006.
15. Kamvar. S. D, Schlosser. M. T, and Mollina. H. G, The Eigen Trust Algorithm for Reputation Management in P2P Networks, Proccedings of The 12th International World Wide Web Conference (Page: 640-651 Year of Publication: 2003 ISBN: 1-58113-680-3).
16. Aykanat. C, Turk. A, Site-Based Partitioning and Repartitioning Techniques for Parallel PageRank Computation, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 786-802, 2011.
17. Wang. Y, Dewitt. D. J, Computing PageRank in a Distributed Internet Search System, Proceedings of the 30th VLDB Conference(Page: 420-431 Year of Publication: 2004 ISBN: 0-12-088469-0).