Linking stream flow and groundwater to avian habitat in a desert riparian system

Ecological Applications

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1973-1988

  Merritt, David M ^a,b   Bateman, Heather L ^c  

^a Natural Resources Research Center   (United States)

^b Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Avian; Bird; Environmental flows; Groundwater; Habitat index; Instream flow; Populus fremontii; Riparian; Stream; Stream flow; Tamarix ramosissima

Indexed keywords

GROUND WATER;

AVIFAUNA; BIRD; DECIDUOUS TREE; DESERT; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; HABITAT MANAGEMENT; HABITAT STRUCTURE; MIGRATORY SPECIES; RIPARIAN VEGETATION; STREAMFLOW; VEGETATION COVER;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIRD; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DESERT CLIMATE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; RIVER; TIME; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; ARIZONA; BIRDS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DESERT CLIMATE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GROUNDWATER; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANTS; RIVERS; TIME FACTORS;

ARIZONA; CHERRY CREEK RESERVOIR; COLORADO; SALT RIVER; SONORAN DESERT; UNITED STATES;

AVES; PLATANUS WRIGHTII; POPULUS FREMONTII; SALIX GOODDINGII; TAMARIX RAMOSISSIMA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84868523254     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/12-0303.1     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Arnold, G. W. 1988. The effects of habitat structure and floristics on the densities of bird species in Wandoo Woodland. Australian Wildlife Research 15:499-510.
2. Bateman, H. L., M. J. Harner, and A. Chung-MacCoubrey. 2008. Abundance and reproduction of toads (Bufo) along a regulated river in the southwestern United States: importance of flooding in riparian ecosystems. Journal of Arid Environments 72:1613-1619.
3. Bibby, C. J., B. N. Phillips, and A. J. E. Seddon. 1985. Birds of restocked conifer plantations in Wales. Journal of Applied Ecology 22:619-633.
4. Boggs, K., and T. Weaver. 1994. Changes in vegetation and nutrient pools during riparian succession. Wetlands 14:98-109.
5. Brand, L. A., J. C. Stromberg, D. C. Goodrich, M. D. Dixon, K. Lansey, D. Kang, D. S. Brookshire, and D. J. Cerasale. 2011. Projecting avian response to linked changes in groundwater and riparian floodplain vegetation along a dryland river: a scenario analysis. Ecohydrology 4:130-142.
6. Brand, L. A., J. C. Stromberg, and B. R. Noon. 2010. Avian density and nest survival on the San Pedro River: importance of vegetation type and hydrologic regime. Journal of Wildlife Management 74:739-754.
7. Brand, L. A., G. C. White, and B. R. Noon. 2008. Factors influencing species richness and community composition of breeding birds in a desert riparian corridor. Condor 110:199-210.
8. Braun-Blanquet, J. 1965. Plant sociology: the study of plant communities. C. D. Fuller and H. S. Conard, translators and editors. Hafner, London, UK.
9. Brenowitz, G. L. 1978. Gila Woodpecker agonistic behavior. Auk 95:49-58.
10. Busch, D. E., N. L. Ingraham, and S. D. Smith. 1992. Water uptake in woody riparian phreatophytes of the southwestern United States: a stable isotope study. Ecological Applications 2:450-459.
11. Busch, D. E., and S. D. Smith. 1995. Mechanisms associated with decline of woody species in riparian ecosystems of the southwestern U.S. Ecological Monographs 65:347-370.
12. Canterbury, G. E., T. E. Martin, D. R. Petit, L. J. Petit, and D. F. Bradford. 2000. Bird communities and habitat as ecological indicators of forest condition in regional monitoring. Conservation Biology 14:544-558.
13. Carothers, S. 1974. Breeding ecology and time-energy budget of male Vermilion Flycatchers and comments on the social organization of southwestern riparian birds. Dissertation. University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
14. Cleverly, J. R., S. D. Smith, A. Sala, and D. A. Devitt. 1997. Invasive capacity of Tamarix ramosissima in a Mojave desert floodplain: the role of drought. Oecologia 111:12-18.
15. Cody, M. L. 1981. Habitat selection in birds: the roles of vegetation structure, competitors and productivity. BioSci-ence 31:107-113.
16. Curtis, R. O., and D. D. Marshall. 2000. Why quadratic mean diameter? Western Journal of Applied Forestry 15:137-139.
17. Davis, M. A., et al. 2005. Vegetation change: a reunifying concept in plant ecology. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics 7:69-76.
18. Dewine, J. M., and D. J. Cooper. 2008. Canopy shade and the successional replacement of Tamarisk by native box elder. Journal of Applied Ecology 45:505-514.
19. Doyle, A. T. 1990. Use of riparian and upland habitats by small mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 71:14-23.
20. Ellis, L. M. 1995. Bird use of saltcedar and cottonwood vegetation in the Middle Rio Grande Valley of New Mexico, U.S.A. Journal of Arid Environments 30:339-349.
21. Emmerich, J. M., and P. A. Vohs. 1982. Comparative use of four woodland habitats by birds. Journal of Wildlife Management 46:43-49.
22. Finch, D. M. 1989. Habitat use and habitat overlap of riparian birds in three elevational zones. Ecology 70:866-880.
23. Freemark, K. E., and H. G. Merriam. 1986. Importance of area and habitat heterogeneity to bird assemblages in temperate forest fragments. Biological Conservation 36:115-141.
24. Gore, J. A., and F. D. Shields. 1995. Can large rivers be restored? BioScience 45:142-152.
25. Haney, J. A., D. S. Turner, A. E. Springer, J. C. Stromberg, L. E. Stevens, P. A. Pearthree, and V. Supplee. 2008. Ecological implications of Verde River flows. A report by the Arizona Water Institute, The Nature Conservancy, and the Verde River Basin Partnership, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
26. Hawkins, T. W., and A. W. Ellis. 2010. The dependence of streamflow on antecedent subsurface moisture in an arid climate. Journal of Arid Environments 74:75-86.
27. Hill, M. O., and P. Smilauer. 2005. TWINSPAN for Windows version 2.3. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology and University of South Bohemia, Huntingdon, UK and Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
28. Horton, J. L., and J. L. Clark. 2001. Water table decline alters growth and survival of Salix gooddingii and Tamarix chinensis seedlings. Forest Ecology and Management 140:239-247.
29. Horton, J. L., T. E. Kolb, and S. C. Hart. 2001a. Physiological response to groundwater depth varies among species and with river flow regulation. Ecological Applications 11:1046-1059.
30. Horton, J. L., T. Kolb, and S. C. Hart. 2001b. Leaf gas exchange characteristics differ among Sonoran desert riparian tree species. Tree Physiology 21:233-241.
31. Horton, J. L., T. E. Kolb, and S. C. Hart. 2001c. Responses of riparian trees to interannual variation in ground water depth in a semi-arid river basin. Plant Cell and Environment 24:293-304.
32. Hutto, R. L., S. M. Pletschet, and P. Hendricks. 1986. A fixed-radius point count method for nonbreeding and breeding season use. Auk 103:593-602.
33. IPCC. 2007. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averiyt, M. Tignor, H. L. Miller, editors. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
34. Jones, C. G., J. H. Lawton, and M. Shachak. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373-386.
35. Kirkpatrick, C., C. J. Conway, and D. LaRoche. 2009. Surface water depletion and riparian birds. Final report submitted to Arizona Game and Fish Department by USGS Arizona Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
36. Kissling, W. D., R. Field, and K. Boehning-Gaese. 2008. Spatial patterns of woody plant and bird diversity: functional relationships or environmental effects? Global Ecology and Biogeography 17:327-339.
37. Knopf, F. L., R. R. Johnson, T. Rich, F. B. Samson, and R. C. Szaro. 1988. Conservation of riparian ecosystems in the United States. Wilson Bulletin 100:272-284.
38. Knopf, F. L., and F. B. Samson. 1994. Scale perspectives on avian diversity in western riparian ecosystems. Conservation Biology 8:669-676.
39. Kolb, T. E., S. C. Hart, and R. Amundson. 1997. Boxelder water sources and physiology at perennial and ephemeral stream sites in Arizona. Tree Physiology 17:151-160.
40. Kondolf, G. M. 1997. Hungry water: effects of dams and gravel mining on river channels. Environmental Management 21:533-551.
41. Legendre, P., and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical ecology. Second English edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
42. Lesica, P., and S. Miles. 2001. Tamarisk growth at the northern margin of its naturalized range in Montana, USA. Wetlands 21:240-246.
43. Lite, S. J., and J. C. Stromberg. 2005. Surface water and ground-water thresholds for maintaining Populus-Salix forests, San Pedro River, Arizona. Biological Conservation 125:153-167.
44. MacArthur, R. H. 1964. Environmental factors affecting bird species diversity. American Naturalist 98:387-397.
45. MacArthur, R. H., and J. W. MacArthur. 1961. On bird species-diversity. Ecology 42:594-605.
46. MacNally, R. 1990. The roles of floristics and physiognomy in avian community composition. Australian Journal of Ecology 15:321-327.
47. Mahoney, J. M., and S. B. Rood. 1998. Streamflow requirements for cottonwood seedling recruitment\an integrative model. Wetlands 18:634-645.
48. Marshall, R. M., M. D. Robles, D. R. Majka, and J. A. Haney. 2010. Sustainable water management in the southwestern United States: reality or rhetoric? PLoS One 5.
49. Martin, K., and J. M. Eadie. 1999. Nest webs: a community-wide approach to the management and conservation of cavity-nesting forest birds. Forest Ecology and Management 115:243-257.
50. McElhinny, C., P. Gibbons, C. Brack, and J. Bauhus. 2005. Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: its definition and measurement. Forest Ecology and Management 218:1-24.
51. Merritt, D. M., H. L. Bateman, and C. D. Peltz. 2010. Instream flow requirements for maintenance of wildlife habitat and riparian vegetation: Cherry Creek, Tonto National Forest, Arizona. Report prepared for Tonto National Forest, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
52. Merritt, D. M., and N. L. Poff. 2010. Shifting dominance of riparian Populus and Tamarix along gradients of flow alteration in western North American rivers. Ecological Applications 20:135-152.
53. Molles, M. C., C. S. Crawford, L. M. Ellis, H. M. Valett, and C. N. Dahm. 1998. Managed flooding for riparian ecosystem restoration. BioScience 48:749-756.
54. Naiman, R. J., S. E. Bunn, C. Nilsson, G. E. Petts, G. Pinay, and L. C. Thompson. 2002. Legitimizing fluvial ecosystems as users of water: an overview. Environmental Management 30:455-467.
55. Nilsson, C., and K. Berggren. 2000. Alterations of riparian ecosystems caused by river regulation. BioScience 50:783-792.
56. Palmer, G. C., and A. F. Bennett. 2006. Riparian zones provide for distinct bird assemblages in forest mosaics and south-east Australia. Biological Conservation 130:447-457.
57. Pockman, W. T., and J. S. Sperry. 2000. Vulnerability to xylem cavitation and the distribution of Sonoran desert vegetation. American Journal of Botany 87:1287-1299.
58. Poff, N. L., D. J. Allen, M. A. Palmer, D. D. Hart, B. D. Richter, A. H. Arthington, K. H. Rogers, and J. A. Stanford. 2003. River flows and water wars: emerging science for environmental decision making. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:298-306.
59. Powell, B. F., and R. J. Steidl. 2000. Nesting habitat and reproductive success of Southwestern riparian birds. The Condor 102:823-831.
60. Powell, B. F., and R. J. Steidl. 2002. Habitat selection by riparian songbirds breeding in southern Arizona. Journal of Wildlife Management 66:1096-1103.
61. Roth, R. R. 1976. Spatial heterogeneity and bird species-diversity. Ecology 57:773-782.
62. Sabo, J. L., R. Sponseller, M. Dixon, K. Gade, T. Harms, J. Heffernan, A. Jani, G. Katz, C. Soykan, J. Watts, and A. Welter. 2005. Riparian zones increase regional species richness by harboring different, not more, species. Ecology 86:56-62.
63. Sanders, T. A., and W. D. Edge. 1998. Breeding bird community composition in relation to riparian vegetation structure in the western United States. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:461-473.
64. SAS. 2011. SAS Stat 9.3. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
65. Scott, M. L., G. C. Lines, and G. T. Auble. 2000. Channel incision and patterns of cottonwood stress and mortality along the Mojave River, California. Journal of Arid Environments 44:399-414.
66. Scott, M. L., P. B. Shafroth, and G. T. Auble. 1999. Responses of riparian cottonwoods to alluvial water table declines. Environmental Management 23:347-358.
67. Sedgwick, J. A. 1997. Sequential cavity use in a cottonwood bottomland. Condor 99:880-887.
68. Shafroth, P. B., J. C. Stromberg, and D. T. Patten. 2000. Woody riparian vegetation response to different alluvial water table regimes. Western North American Naturalist 60:66-76.
69. Sher, A. A., D. L. Marshall, and S. A. Gilbert. 2000. Competition between native Populus deltoides and invasive Tamarix ramosissima and the implications for reestablishing flooding disturbance. Conservation Biology 14:1744-1754.
70. Smith, S. D., A. B. Wellington, J. L. Nachlinger, and C. A. Fox. 1991. Functional responses of riparian vegetation to stream-flow diversion in the eastern Sierra Nevada. Ecological Applications 1:89-97.
71. Stromberg, J. C., K. J. Bagstad, J. M. Leenhouts, S. J. Lite, and E. Makings. 2005. Effects of stream flow intermittency on riparian vegetation of a semiarid region river (San Pedro River, Arizona). River Research and Applications 21:925-938.
72. Stromberg, J. C., J. A. Boudell, and A. F. Hazelton. 2008. Differences in seed mass between hydric and xeric plants influence seed bank dynamics in a dryland riparian ecosystem. Functional Ecology 22:205-212.
73. Stromberg, J. C., S. J. Lite, and M. D. Dixon. 2010. Effects of stream flow patterns on riparian vegetation of a semiarid river: implications for a changing climate. River Research and Applications 26:712-729.
74. Stromberg, J. C., S. J. Lite, R. Marler, C. Paradzick, P. B. Shafroth, D. Shorrock, J. M. White, and M. S. White. 2007. Altered stream-flow regimes and invasive plant species: the Tamarix case. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16:381-393.
75. Stromberg, J. C., R. Tiller, and B. Richter. 1996. Effects of groundwater decline on riparian vegetation of semiarid regions: the San Pedro, Arizona. Ecological Applications 6:113-131.
76. Tews, J., U. Brose, V. Grimm, K. Tielborger, M. C. Wichmann, M. Schwager, and F. Jeltsch. 2004. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. Journal of Biogeography 31:79-92.
77. Tyree, M. T., K. J. Kolb, S. J. Rood, and S. Patino. 1994. Vulnerability to drought induced cavitation of riparian cottonwoods in Alberta: a possible factor in the decline of the ecosystem? Tree Physiology 14:455-466.
78. USGS. 1988. Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency, Bulletin 17-B. Bulletin #17B PB86 157278/AS. United States Geological Survey, Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C., USA.
79. Waddle, T. J., and K. D. Bovee. 2009. Environmental flows studies of the Fort Collins Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey: Cherry Creek, Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, USA.
80. Wiens, J. A. 1974. Habitat heterogeneity and avian community structure in North American grasslands. American Midland Naturalist 91:195-213.
81. Willson, M. F. 1974. Avian community organization and habitat structure. Ecology 55:1017-1029.
82. Woinarski, J. C. Z., H. F. Recher, and J. D. Majer. 1997. Vertebrates of eucalypt formations. Pages 303-341 in J. E. Williams and J. C. Z. Woinarski, editors. Eucalypt ecology: individuals to ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
83. Zar, J. H. 1996. Biostatistical analysis. Third edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.