Effects of stream flow patterns on riparian vegetation of a semiarid river: Implications for a changing climate

River Research and Applications

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 712-729

  Stromberg, J C ^a   Lite, S J ^a   Dixon, M D ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b W O Farber Center for Civic Leadership   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Flood disturbance; Populus; Riparian vegetation; Semiarid; Stream intermittency; Tamarix

Indexed keywords

BASEFLOW; CLIMATE CHANGE; DECIDUOUS TREE; FLOOD FREQUENCY; FLOODING; FLOW PATTERN; HYDROLOGY; RIPARIAN VEGETATION; SEMIARID REGION; SPATIAL VARIATION; STREAMFLOW;

ARIZONA; SAN PEDRO RIVER; UNITED STATES;

BACCHARIS; POPULUS; SALIX; TAMARIX;

EID: 77954471511     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: 15351467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rra.1272     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Amlin NM, Rood SB. 2002. Comparative tolerances of riparian willows and cottonwoods to water-table decline. Wetlands 22: 338-346.
2. Arnell NW. 2003. Effects of IPCC SRES emissions scenarios on river runoff: a global perspective. Hydrology and Earth Systems Sciences 7: 619-641.
3. Auble GT, Scott ML, Friedman JM. 2005. Use of individualistic streamflow-vegetation relations along the Fremont River, Utah, USA to assess impacts of flow alteration on wetland and riparian areas. Wetlands 25: 143-154.
4. Bagstad KJ, Stromberg JC, Lite SJ. 2005. Response of herbaceous riparian plants to rain and flooding on the San Pedro River, Arizona, USA. Wetlands 25: 210-223.
5. Baillie MN, Hogan JF, Ekwurzel B, Wahi AK, Eastoe CJ. 2007. Quantifying water sources to a semiarid riparian ecosystem, San Pedro River, Arizona. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences 112 (G3): S02.
6. Baird K, Stromberg J, Maddock T. 2005. Linking riparian dynamics and groundwater: an eco-hydrologic approach to modeling groundwater and riparian vegetation. Environmental Management 36: 551-564.
7. Baker WL. 1989. Macro-and micro-scale influences on riparian vegetation in western Colorado. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 79: 65-78.
8. Baker WL, Egbert SL, Frazier GF. 1991.A spatial model for studying the effects of climatic change on the structure of landscapes subject to large disturbances. Ecological Modelling 56: 109-125.
9. Barnett TP, Pierce DW, Hidalgo HG, Bonfils C, Santer BD, Das T, Bala G, Wood AW, Nozawa T, Mirin AA, Cayan DR, Dettinger MD. 2008. Human-induced changes in the hydrology of the western United States. Science 319: 1080-1083.
10. Bendix J. 1994. Among-site variation in riparian vegetation of the southern California transverse ranges. American Midland Naturalist 132: 136-151.
11. Bendix J. 1999. Stream power influence on southern Californian riparian vegetation. Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 243-252.
12. Bendix J, Hupp CR. 2000. Hydrological and geomorphological impacts on riparian plant communities. Hydrological Processes 14: 2977-2990.
13. Bloschl G, Ardoin-Bardin S, Bonell M, Dorninger M, Goodrich D, Gutknecht D, Matamoros D, Merz B, Shand P, Szolgay J. 2007. At what scales do climate variability and land cover change impact on flooding and low flows? Hydrological Processes 21: 1241-1247.
14. Boggs K, Weaver T. 1994. Changes in vegetation and nutrient pools during riparian succession. Wetlands 14: 98-109.
15. Braatne JH, Rood SB, Heilman PE. 1996. Life history, ecology, and conservation of riparian cottonwoods in North America. In Biology of Populus and Its Implications for Management and Conservation, Steller RF (ed.). National Research Council of Canada, NRC Research Press: Ottawa; 57-85.
16. Burgess TL. 1995. Desert grassland, mixed shrub savanna, shrub steppe, or semidesert scrub? The dilemma of coexisting growth forms. In The Desert Grassland. McClaren MP, Van Devender TR (eds). University of Arizona Press: Tucson; 31-67.
17. Castelli RM, Chambers JC, Tausch RJ. 2000. Soil-plant relations along a soil-water gradient in great basin riparian meadows.Wetlands 20: 251-266.
18. Chapin FS,Walker BH, Hobbs RJ, Hooper DU, Lawton JH, Sala OE, Tilman D. 1997. Biotic control over the functioning of ecosystems. Science 277: 500-504.
19. Cooper DJ, D'Amico DR, Scott ML. 2003. Physiological and morphological response patterns of Populus deltoides to alluvial groundwater pumping. Environmental Management 31: 215-226.
20. Corenblit D, Tabacchi E, Steiger J, Gurnell AM. 2007. Reciprocal interactions and adjustments between fluvial landforms and vegetation dynamics in river corridors: a review of complementary approaches. Earth Science Reviews 84: 56-86.
21. Cosgriff RJ, Nelson JC, Yin Y. 2007. Floodplain forest response to large-scale flood disturbance. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science 100: 47-70.
22. Dahm CN, Molles MC Jr. 1992. Streams in semi-arid regions as sensitive indicators of global climate change. In Global Climate Change and Freshwater Ecosystems, Firth P, Fisher S (eds). Springer-Verlag: New York; 250-260.
23. Dahm CN, Cleverly JR, Coonrod JEA, Thibault JR, McDonnell DE, Gilroy DF. 2002. Evapotranspiration at the land/water interface in a semiarid drainage basin. Freshwater Biology 47: 831-843.
24. Dawson TE. 1996. Determining water use by trees and forests from isotopic, energy balance and transpiration analyses: the roles of tree size and hydraulic lift. Tree Physiology 16: 263-272.
25. Diffenbaugh NS, Pal JS, Trapp RJ, Giorgi F. 2005. Fine-scale processes regulate the response of extreme events to global climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 15774-15778.
26. Dixon MD. 2003. Effects of flow pattern on riparian seedling recruitment on sandbars in the Wisconsin River, Wisconsin, USA. Wetlands 23: 125-139.
27. Dixon MD, Johnson WC. 1999. Riparian vegetation along the middle Snake River, Idaho: zonation, geographical trends, and historical changes. Great Basin Naturalist 59: 18-34.
28. Dixon MD, Stromberg JC, Price JT, Galbraith H, Fremier AK, Larsen EW. 2009. Potential effects of climate change on the upper San Pedro riparian ecosystem. In Ecology and Conservation of the San Pedro River, Stromberg JC, Tellman B (eds). University of Arizona Press: Tucson; 57-72.
29. Elmore AJ, Mustard JF, Manning SJ. 2003. Regional patterns of plant community response to changes in water: Owens Valley, California. Ecological Applications 13: 443-460.
30. Fierke MK, Kauffman JB. 2005. Structural dynamics of riparian forests along a black cottonwood successional gradient. Forest Ecology and Management 215: 149-162.
31. Friedman JM, Auble GT. 1999. Mortality of riparian box elder from sediment mobilization and extended inundation. Regulated Rivers-Research and Management 15: 463-476.
32. Friedman JM, Lee VJ. 2002. Extreme floods, channel change, and riparian forests along ephemeral streams. Ecological Monographs 72: 409-425.
33. Friedman JM, Osterkamp WR, LewisWM Jr. 1996. Channel narrowing and vegetation development following a Great Plains flood. Ecology 77: 2467-2481.
34. Friedman JM, Auble GT, Andrews ED, Kittel G, Madole RF, Griffin ER, Allred TM. 2006. Transverse and longitudinal variation in woody riparian vegetation along a montane river. Western North American Naturalist 66: 78-91.
35. Fukami T,Wardle DA. 2005. Long-term ecological dynamics: reciprocal insights from natural and anthropogenic gradients. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 272: 2105-2115.
36. Garfin G, Lenart M. 2007. Climate change effects on Southwest water resources. Southwest Hydrology 16-17: 34.
37. Gazal R, Scott RL, Goodrich DC,Williams DG. 2006. Controls on transpiration in a semiarid riparian cottonwood forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 137: 56-67.
38. Gitlin AR, Sthultz CM, Bowker MA, Stumpf S, Paxton KL, Kennedy K, Munoz A, Bailey JK, Whitham TG. 2006. Mortality gradients within and among dominant plant populations as barometers of ecosystem change during extreme drought. Conservation Biology 20: 1477-1486.
39. Glenn EP, Nagler PL. 2005. Comparative ecophysiology of Tamarix ramosissima and native trees in western US riparian zones. Journal of Arid Environments 61: 419-446.
40. Grime JP. 1979. Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. John Wiley and Sons: New York; 222.
41. Gyssels G, Poesen J, Bochet E, Li Y. 2005. Impact of plant roots on the resistance of soils to erosion by water: a review. Progress in Physical Geography 29: 189-217.
42. Hereford H, Betancourt JL. 2009. Historic geomorphology of the San Pedro River: archival and physical evidence. In Ecology and Conservation of the San Pedro River, Stromberg JC, Tellman B (eds). University of Arizona Press: Tucson; 232-250.
43. Hirschboeck KK. 2009. Flood flows of the San Pedro River. In Ecology and Conservation of the San Pedro River. Stromberg JC, Tellman B (eds). University of Arizona Press: Tucson. Horton JL, Clark JL. 2001. Water table decline alters growth and survival of Salix gooddingii and Tamarix chinensis seedlings. Forest Ecology and Management 140: 239-247.
44. Horton JL, Kolb TE, Hart SC. 2001. Physiological response to groundwater depth varies among species and with river flow regulation. Ecological Applications 11: 1046-1059.
45. Horton JL, Hart SC, Kolb TE. 2003. Physiological condition and water source use of Sonoran Desert riparian trees at the Bill Williams River, Arizona, USA. Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies 39: 69-82.
46. Hughes FMR. 1997. Floodplain biogeomorphology. Progress in Physical Geography 21: 501-529.
47. Jacobs KL, Garfin GM, Morehouse BJ. 2005. Climate science and drought planning: the Arizona experience. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 41: 437-445.
48. Johansson ME, Nilsson C. 2002. Responses of riparian plants to flooding in free-flowing and regulated boreal rivers: an experimental study. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 971-986.
49. Johnson WC. 1992. Dams and riparian forests: case study from the upper Missouri River. Rivers 3: 229-242.
50. Kearney TH, Peebles RH. 1960. Arizona Flora. University of California Press: Berkeley.
51. Leenhouts JM, Stromberg JC, Scott RL. 2006. Hydrologic requirements of and consumptive ground-water use by riparian vegetation along the San Pedro River, Arizona. USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2005. 5163.
52. Li LJ, Zhang L, Wang H,Wang J, Yang JW, Jiang DJ, Li JY, Qin DY. 2007. Assessing the impact of climate variability and human activities on streamflow from the Wuding River basin in China. Hydrological Processes 21: 3485-3491.
53. Lite SJ, Stromberg JC. 2005. Surface water and ground-water thresholds for maintaining Populus-Salix forests, San Pedro River, Arizona. Biological Conservation 125: 153-167.
54. Lite SJ, Bagstad KJ, Stromberg JC. 2005. Riparian plant species richness along lateral and longitudinal gradients of water stress and flood disturbance, San Pedro River, Arizona, USA. Journal of Arid Environments 63: 785-813.
55. Lopez-Moreno JI, Begueria S, Garcia-Ruiz JM. 2006. Trends in high flows in the central Spanish Pyrenees: response to climatic factors or to land-use change? Hydrological Sciences Journal 51: 1039-1050.
56. Lytle DA, Merritt DM. 2004. Hydrologic regimes and riparian forests: a structured population model for cottonwood. Ecology 85: 2493-2503.
57. Mahoney JM, Rood SB. 1998. Streamflow requirements for cottonwood seedling recruitment-an integrative model. Wetlands 18: 634-645.
58. Merigliano MF. 2005. Cottonwood understory zonation and its relation to floodplain stratigraphy. Wetlands 25: 356-374.
59. Merkel DL, Hopkins HH. 1957. Life history of salt cedar (Tamarix gallica L.). Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 60: 360-369.
60. Micheli ER, Kirchner JW. 2002. Effects of wet meadow riparian vegetation on streambank erosion: remote sensing measurements of streambank migration and erodibility. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 27: 627-639.
61. Miller SN, Kepner WG, Mehaffey MH, Hernandez M, Miller RC, Goodrich DC, Devonald KK, Heggem DT, Miller WP. 2002. Integrating landscape assessment and hydrologic modeling for land cover change analysis. Journal of the AmericanWater Resources Association 38: 915-929.
62. Nagler P, Scott R,Westenburg C, Cleverly J, Glenn E, Huete A. 2005. Evapotranspiration on western U.S. rivers estimated using the Enhanced Vegetation Index from MODIS and data from eddy covariance and Bowen ratio flux towers. Remote Sensing of Environment 97: 337-351.
63. Nanson GC, Tooth S, Knighton AD. 2002. A global perspective of dryland rivers: perceptions, misconceptions, and distinctions. In Bull LL, Kirkby MJ (eds). Dryland Rivers: Hydrology and Geomorphology of Semi-arid Channels. Wiley Press: Chichester; 17-54.
64. Palmer MA, Liermann CAR, Nilsson C, Floerke M, Alcamo J, Lake PS, Bond N. 2008. Climate change and the world's river basins: anticipating management options. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 81-89.
65. Patten DT. 1998. Riparian ecosystems of semi-arid North America: diversity and human impacts. Wetlands 18: 498-512.
66. Pfister L, Kwadijk J, Musy A, Bronstert A, Hoffmann L. 2004. Climate change, land use change and runoff prediction in the RhineMeuse basins. River Research and Applications 20: 229-241.
67. Poff NL. 1992. Regional hydrologic response to climate change: an ecological perspective. In Firth P, Fisher S (eds). Global Climate Change and Freshwater Ecosystems. Springer-Verlag: New York; 88-115.
68. Primack AGB. 2000. Simulation of climate-change effects on riparian vegetation in the Pere Marquette River Michigan. Wetlands 20: 538-547.
69. Rood SB, Braatne JH, Hughes FMR. 2003. Ecophysiology of riparian cottonwoods: stream flow dependency, water relations and restoration. Tree Physiology 23: 1113-1124.
70. Rood SB, Goater LA, Mahoney JM, Pearce CM, Smith DG. 2007. Floods, fire, and ice: disturbance ecology of riparian cottonwoods. Canadian Journal of Botany 85: 1019-1032.
71. Rood SB, Pan J, Gill KM, Franks CG, Samuelson GM, Shepherd A. 2008. Declining summer flows of Rocky Mountain rivers: changing seasonal hydrology and probable impacts on floodplain forests. Journal of Hydrology 349: 397-410.
72. Salinas MJ, Casas JJ. 2007. Riparian vegetation of two semi-arid Mediterranean rivers: basin-scale responses of woody and herbaceous plants to environmental gradients. Wetlands 27: 831-845.
73. Schaeffer SM, Williams DG, Goodrich DC. 2000. Transpiration of cottonwood/willow forest estimated from sap flux. Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 105: 257-270.
74. Scott ML, Friedman JM, Auble GT. 1996. Fluvial processes and the establishment of bottomland trees. Geomorphology 14: 327-339.
75. Scott ML, Shafroth PB, Auble GT. 1999. Responses of riparian cottonwoods to alluvial water table declines. Environmental Management 23: 347-358.
76. Scott RL, Shuttleworth WL, Goodrich DC. 2000. The water use of two dominant vegetation communities in a semiarid riparian ecosystem. Journal of Agriculture and Forest Meteorology 105: 241-256.
77. Seager R, Ting M, Held I, Kushnir Y, Lu J, Vecchi G, Huang HP, Harnik N, Leetmaa A, Lau NC, Li C, Velez J, Naik N. 2007. Model projections of a more arid climate in southwestern North America. Science 316: 1181-1184.
78. Serrat-Capdevila A, Valdes JB, Perez JG, Baird K, Mata LJ, Maddock T. 2007. Modeling climate change impacts and uncertainty on the hydrology of a riparian system: the San Pedro Basin (Arizona/Sonora). Journal of Hydrology 347: 48-66.
79. Shafroth PB, Auble GT, Stromberg JC, Patten DT. 1998. Establishment of woody riparian vegetation in relation to annual patterns of streamflow, Bill Williams River, Arizona. Wetlands 18: 577-590.
80. Shafroth PB, Stromberg JC, Patten DT. 2000. Woody riparian vegetation response to different alluvial water table regimes. Western North American Naturalist 60: 66-76.
81. Shafroth PB, Cleverly JR, Dudley TL, Taylor JP, van Riper C III, Weeks EP, Stuart JN, 2005. Control of Tamarix spp. in the western U.S.: implications for water salvage, wildlife use, and riparian restoration. Environmental Management 35: 231-246.
82. Sheppard PR, Comrie AC, Packin GD, Angersbach K, Hughes MK. 2002. The climate of the US Southwest. Climate Research 21: 219-238.
83. Sher AA, Marshall DL, Gilbert SA. 2000. Competition between native Populus deltoides and invasive Tamarix ramosissima and the implications for reestablishing flooding disturbance. Conservation Biology 14: 1744-1754.
84. Smith SD, Wellington AB, Nachlinger JL, Fox CA. 1991. Functional responses of riparian vegetation to streamflow diversion in the eastern Sierra-Nevada. Ecological Applications 1: 89-97.
85. Smith SD, Devitt DA, Sala A, Cleverly JR, Busch DE. 1998.Water relations of riparian plants from warm desert regions.Wetlands 18: 687-696.
86. Sperry JS, Hacke UG, Oren R, Comstock JP. 2002.Water deficits and hydraulic limits to leaf water supply. Plant Cell and Environment 25: 251-263.
87. Stanley EH, Fisher SG, Grimm NB. 1997. Ecosystem expansion and contraction in streams. BioScience 47: 427-435.
88. Stella JC, Battles JJ, Orr BK, McBride JR. 2006. Synchrony of seed dispersal, hydrology and local climate in a semi-arid river reach in California. Ecosystems 9: 1200-1214.
89. Stringham TK, Krueger WC, Thomas DR. 2001. Application of non-equilibrium ecology to rangeland riparian zones. Journal of Range Management 54: 210-217.
90. Stromberg JC. 1998. Dynamics of Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii) and saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) populations along the San Pedro River, Arizona. Journal of Arid Environments 40: 133-155.
91. Stromberg JC, Tellman B (eds). 2009. Ecology and Conservation of the San Pedro River. University of Arizona Press: Tucson.
92. Stromberg JC, Tiller R, Richter B. 1996. Effects of groundwater decline on riparian vegetation of semiarid regions: the San Pedro, River, Arizona. Ecological Applications 6: 113-131.
93. Stromberg JC, Fry J, Patten DT. 1997. Marsh development after large floods in an alluvial, arid-land river. Wetlands 17: 292-300.
94. Stromberg JC, Bagstad KJ, Leenhouts JM, Lite SJ, Makings E. 2005. Effects of stream flow intermittency on riparian vegetation of a semiarid region river (San Pedro River, Arizona). River Research and Applications 21: 25-938.
95. Stromberg JC, Beauchamp VB, Dixon MD, Lite SJ, Paradzick C. 2007. Importance of low-flow and high-flow characteristics to restoration of riparian vegetation along rivers in arid southwestern United States. Freshwater Biology 52: 651-679.
96. Stromberg JC, Hazelton AF, White MS. 2009. Plant species richness in ephemeral and perennial reaches of a dryland river. Biodiversity and Conservation 18: 663-677.
97. Tabacchi E, Planty-Tabacchi A, Salinas MJ, Décamps H. 1996. Landscape structure and diversity in riparian plant communities: a longitudinal comparative study. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 12: 367-390.
98. Thorp JH, Thoms MC, Delong MD. 2006. The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time. River Research and Applications 22: 123-147.
99. Tiegs SD, O'Leary JF, Pohl MM, Munill CL. 2005. Flood disturbance and riparian species diversity on the Colorado River Delta. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 1175-1194.
100. Timmermann A, Oberhuber J, Bacher A, Esch M, Latif M, Roeckner E. 1999. Increased El Nin ̃o frequency in a climate model forced by future greenhouse warming. Nature 398: 694-697.
101. Walker LR, Zasada JC, Chapin FS. 1986. The role of life-history processes in primary succession on an Alaskan floodplain. Ecology 67: 1243-1253.
102. Webb RH, Betancourt JL., 1992. Climatic variability and flood frequency of the Santa Cruz River, Pima County, Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2379.
103. Webb RH, Leake SA, Turner RM. 2007. The Ribbon of Green. University of Arizona Press: Tucson; 463.
104. Webster PJ, Holland GJ, Curry JA, Chang HR. 2005. Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment. Science 309: 1844-1846.
105. Whited DC, Lorang MS, Harner MJ, Hauer FR, Kimball JS, Stanford JA. 2007. Climate, hydrologic disturbance, and succession: drivers of floodplain pattern. Ecology 88: 940-953.
106. Wilcox BP, Owens MK, DugasWA, Ueckert DN, Hart CR. 2006. Shrubs, streamflow, and the paradox of scale. Hydrologic Processes 20: 3245-3259.
107. Williams CA, Cooper DJ. 2005. Mechanisms of riparian cottonwood decline along regulated rivers. Ecosystems 8: 382-395.
108. Williams DG, Scott RL. 2009. Vegetation-hydrology interactions: dynamics of riparian plant water use. In Stromberg JC, Tellman B (eds). Ecology and Conservation of the San Pedro River. University of Arizona Press: Tucson.
109. Williams DG, Brunel JP, Schaeffer SM, Snyder KA. 1998. Biotic controls over the functioning of desert riparian ecosystems. In Proceedings from the Special Symposium on Hydrology, Wood EF, Chehbouni AG, Goodrich DC, Seo DJ, Zimmerman JR (eds). American Meteorological Society: Boston; 43-48.
110. Zimmerman RL. 1969. Plant Ecology of an Arid Basin, Tres Alamos-Redington Area. USGS Professional Paper 485-D.