Different growth strategies determine the carbon gain and productivity of aspen collectives to be used in short-rotation plantations

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 46, Issue , 2012, Pages 242-250

  Müller, Annika ^a   Horna, Viviana ^a   Zhang, Chunxia ^b   Leuschner, Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Carbon gain; Genotypic variation; Growth performance; Leaf phaenology; Photosynthesis; Populus tremula

Indexed keywords

ASSIMILATION RATE; CARBOXYLATION EFFICIENCIES; GENOTYPIC VARIATIONS; GROWING SEASON; GROWTH PERFORMANCE; GROWTH POTENTIAL; GROWTH STRATEGY; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; LEAF ABSCISSION; LEAF AREA; LEAF PHAENOLOGY; LEAF WATER POTENTIAL; PHOTOSYNTHETIC CAPACITY; PHYSIOLOGICAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS; POPULUS TREMULA; SHORT ROTATION; TOTAL LEAF AREA; TREE SPECIES; WATER STATUS; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBOXYLATION; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANTS (BOTANY); PRODUCTIVITY; QUANTUM YIELD; TIMBER; WATER SUPPLY;

FORESTRY;

ADAPTATION; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; DECIDUOUS TREE; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; FORESTRY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; GROWING SEASON; LEAF AREA; MORPHOLOGY; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANTATION; SAPLING; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBOXYLATION; FORESTRY; FORESTS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANTS; POPULUS TREMULA; PRODUCTIVITY; WATER SUPPLY;

CENTRAL EUROPE;

POPULUS; POPULUS TREMULA;

EID: 84868503766     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.08.020     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Stanturf J.A., van Oosten C., Netzer D.A., Coleman M.D., Portwood C.J. Ecology and silviculture of poplar plantations. Poplar culture in North America 2001, 153-206. NRC Research Press, Ottawa. D.I. Dickmann, J.G. Isebrands, J.E. Eckenwalder, J. Richardson (Eds.).
2. Hansen E.A. Poplar woody biomass yields - a look to the future. Biomass Bioenerg 1991, 1(1):1-7.
3. Makeschin F. Short rotation forestry in central and northern Europe - introduction and conclusions. For Ecol Manag 1999, 21(1-2):1-7.
4. Dickmann D.I., Kuzovkina J. Poplars and willows of the world, with emphasis on silviculturally important species. Poplars and willows in the world 2008, 3-64. International Poplar Commission Thematic Papers, Rome.
5. Liesebach M., von Wuehlisch G., Muhs H.J. Aspen for short-rotation coppice plantations on agricultural sites in Germany: effects of spacing and rotation time on growth and biomass production of aspen progenies. For Ecol Manag 1999, 121(1-2):25-39.
6. Yu Q.B., Tigerstedt P.M.A., Haapanen M. Growth and phenology of hybrid aspen clones (Populus tremula L. x Populus tremuloides Michx.). Silva Fenn 2001, 35(1):15-25.
7. Marron N., Dillen S.Y., Ceulemans R. Evaluation of leaf traits for indirect selection of high yielding poplar hybrids. Environ Exp Bot 2007, 61(2):103-116.
8. Smulders M.J.M., van der Schoot J., Arens P., Vosman B. Trinucleotide repeat microsatellite markers for black poplar (Populus nigra L.). Mol Ecol Notes 2001, 1(3):188-190.
9. Dayanandan S., Rajora O.P., Bawa K.S. Isolation and characterization of microsatellites in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides). Theor Appl Genet 1998, 96(6-7):950-956.
10. Rahman M.H., Rajora O.P. Microsatellite DNA fingerprinting, differentiation, and genetic relationships of clones, cultivars, and varieties of six poplar species from three sections of the genus Populus. Genome 2002, 45(6):1083-1094.
11. Suvanto L.I., Latva-Karjanmaa T.B. Clone identification and clonal structure of the European aspen (Populus tremula). Mol Ecol 2005, 14(9):2851-2860.
12. Nei M. Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 1972, 106(949):283-292.
13. Peakall R., Smouse P.E. GenAlEx 6: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 2006, 6(1):288-295.
14. Meir P., Levy P.E., Grace J., Jarvis P.G. Photosynthetic parameters from two contrasting woody vegetation types in west Africa. Plant Ecol 2007, 192(2):277-287.
15. Bernacchi C.J., Pimentel C., Long S.P. In vivo temperature response functions of parameters required to model RuBP-limited photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 2003, 26(9):1419-1430.
16. Lenz K.E., Host G.E., Roskoski K., Noormets A., Sober A., Karnosky D.F. Analysis of a Farquhar-von Caemmerer-Berry leaf-level photosynthetic rate model for Populus tremuloides in the context of modeling and measurement limitations. Environ Pollut 2010, 158(4):1015-1022.
17. UPOV International union for the protection of new varieties of plants. Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, homogeneity and stability: poplar (Populus L.) 1981, [TG/21/7]. Geneva, Switzerland.
18. Singh M., Ceccarelli S., Hamblin J. Estimation of heritability from varietal trials data. Theor Appl Genet 1993, 86(4):437-441.
19. Pliura A.S., Zhang Y., MacKay J., Bousquet J. Genotypic variation in wood density and growth traits of poplar hybrids at four clonal trials. For Ecol Manag 2007, 238(1-3):92-106.
20. Lojewski N.R., Fischer D.G., Bailey J.K., Schweitzer J.A., Whitham T.G., Hart S.C. Genetic basis of aboveground productivity in two native Populus species and their hybrids. Tree Physiol 2009, 29(9):1133-1142.
21. Rae A.M., Street N.R., Robinson K.M., Harris N., Taylor G. Five QTL hotspots for yield in short rotation coppice bioenergy poplar: the poplar biomass loci. BMC Plant Biol 2009, 9(1):23-35.
22. Weih M. Genetic and environmental variation in spring and autumn phenology of biomass willows (Salix spp.): effects on shoot growth and nitrogen economy. Tree Physiol 2009, 29(12):1479-1490.
23. Schulze E.D., Beck E., Müller-Hohenstein K. Plant ecology 2002, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg.
24. Rowland D.L. Diversity in physiological and morphological characteristics of four cottonwood (Populus deltoides var. wislizenii) populations in New Mexico: evidence for a genetic component of variation. Can J For Res 2001, 31(5):845-853.
25. Kanaga M.K., Ryel R.J., Mock K.E., Pfreder M.E. Quantitative-genetic variation in morphological and physiological traits within a quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) population. Can J For Res 2008, 38(6):1690-1694.
26. Müller A, Horna V, Kleemann F, Vornam B, Leuschner C. Physiological vs. morphological traits controlling the productivity of six aspen full-sib families. Unpublished results.