Properties of surface-cross-linked micelles probed by fluorescence spectroscopy and their catalysis of phosphate ester hydrolysis

Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

Volumn 390, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 151-157

  Chadha, Geetika ^a   Zhao, Yan ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Catalysis; Cross linking; Hydrolysis; Hydrophobic interactions; Micelles; Nanoparticles

Indexed keywords

2-NAPHTHOLS; ACTIVATED PHOSPHATE ESTER; AMMONIUM SURFACTANTS; AQUEOUS PHASE; CETYLTRIMETHYLAMMONIUM BROMIDE; CROSSLINKER; CTAB MICELLE; EXCITED-STATE PROTON TRANSFER; HYDROPHOBIC INTERACTIONS; HYDROPHOBIC PROBES; NEUTRAL PH; NON-POLAR; PHOSPHATE ESTER HYDROLYSIS; POLYANIONICS; PYRANINE; SOLVENT EXPOSURE; SURFACE BASICITY; WATER-SOLUBLE NANOPARTICLES;

ALKALINITY; AMMONIUM COMPOUNDS; CATALYSIS; ESTERIFICATION; ESTERS; EXCITED STATES; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; HYDROLYSIS; HYDROPHOBICITY; NANOPARTICLES; PHENOLS; PROBES;

MICELLES;

BENZOCAINE PLUS CETRIMIDE PLUS HEXACHLOROPHENE PLUS MEPYRAMINE MALEATE; ORGANOPHOSPHATE; POLYANION;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CATALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CROSS LINKING; EXCITED STATE PROTON TRANSFER; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; HYDROLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE CROSS LINKED MICELLE; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 84868472079     PISSN: 00219797     EISSN: 10957103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.09.042     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Rosen M.J. Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena 1989, Wiley, New York. second ed.
2. Myers D. Surfactant Science and Technology 1992, VCH, New York. second ed.
3. Clint J.H. Surfactant Aggregation 1992, Chapman and Hall, New York.
4. Larrabee C.E., Sprague E.D. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Let. Ed. 1979, 17:749.
5. Paleos C.M., Stassinopoulou C.I., Malliaris A. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87:251.
6. Fendler J.H., Tundo P. Acc. Chem. Res. 1984, 17:3.
7. Tajima K., Aida T. Chem. Commun. 2000, 2399.
8. Summers M., Eastoe J. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 100:137.
9. Kline S.R. Langmuir 1999, 15:2726.
10. Hamid S., Sherrington D. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1986, 936.
11. Hamid S.M., Sherrington D.C. Polymer 1987, 28:332.
12. Cochin D., Zana R., Candau F. Macromolecules 1993, 26:5765.
13. Zhang S., Zhao Y. Macromolecules 2010, 43:4020.
14. Rostovtsev V.V., Green L.G., Fokin V.V., Sharpless K.B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41:2596.
15. Peng H.-Q., Chen Y.-Z., Zhao Y., Yang Q.-Z., Wu L.-Z., Tung C.-H., Zhang L.-P., Tong Q.-X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51:2088.
16. Zhang S., Zhao Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132:10642.
17. Li X., Zhao Y. Langmuir 2012, 28:4152.
18. Lakowicz J.R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy 1999, Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York. second ed.
19. Tsang J.S.W., Neverov A.A., Brown R.S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125:1559.
20. Kosower E.M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1982, 15:259.
21. Bardez E., Goguillon B.T., Keh E., Valeur B. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88:1909.
22. Ireland J.F., Wyatt P.A.H. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1976, 12:131.
23. Arnaut L.G., Formosinho S.J. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 1993, 75:1.
24. Tolbert L.M., Solntsev K.M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35:19.
25. Slavík J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1982, 694:1.
26. Rubalcava B., Martinez de Munoz D., Gitler C. Biochemistry 1969, 8:2742.
27. Bunton C.A., Nome F., Quina F.H., Romsted L.S. Acc. Chem. Res. 1991, 24:357.
28. Abou-Al Einin S., Zaitsev A.K., Zaitsev N.K., Kuzmin M.G. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 1988, 41:365.
29. Kosower E.M., Dodiuk H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96:6195.
30. Weber L.D., Tulinsky A., Johnson J.D., El-Bayoumi M.A. Biochemistry 1979, 18:1297.
31. Dodiuk H., Kanety H., Kosower E.M. J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83:515.
32. The gradual decrease of the intensity with increasing SCM concentration mostly resulted from the weakening of the emission from the nonpolar excited state of ANS, as revealed from peak fitting. This change was most likely due to a slightly lower binding affinity of the SCM for the nonpolar state than for the polar state. As the concentration of the SCM increases, more binding sites became available. As more of the ANS probes occupied the polar binding sites, the overall emission intensity decreased gradually.
33. Politi M.J., Fendler J.H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106:265.
34. Lawrence M., Marzzacco C.J., Morton C., Schwab C., Halpern A.M. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95:10294.
35. Solntsev K.M., Ilichev Y.V., Demyashkevich A.B., Kuzmin M.G. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 1994, 78:39.
36. Ilichev Y.V., Demyashkevich A.B., Kuzmin M.G. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95:3438.
37. Bhattacharyya K. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 36:95.
38. Einin S.A., Zaitsev A.K., Zaitsev N.K., Kuzmin M.G. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 1988, 41:365.
39. Roy D., Karmakar R., Mondal S.K., Sahu K., Bhattacharyya K. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 399:147.
40. Mukerjee P., Banerjee K. J. Phys. Chem. 1964, 68:3567.
41. Fernandez M.S., Fromherz P. J. Phys. Chem. 1977, 81:1755.
42. Lukac S. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87:5045.
43. Kimura E., Hashimoto H., Koike T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118:10963.
44. Moss R.A., Ragunathan K.G. Langmuir 1999, 15:107.
45. Moss R.A., Jiang W.G. Langmuir 2000, 16:49.
46. Menger F.M., Portnoy C.E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89:4698.
47. Menger F.M., Whitesell L.G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107:707.
48. Catalan J., Elguero J. Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 1987, 41:187.
49. Zhang S., Zhao Y. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48:9998.