Cross-ranking of Decision Making Units in Data Envelopment Analysis

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Volumn 37, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 398-405

  Zerafat Angiz, Majid ^a   Mustafa, Adli ^b   Kamali, Mohammad Jalal ^b  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b SCHOOL OF PHYSICS   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Data Envelopment Analysis; Group decision making; Preference aggregation

Indexed keywords

CROSS-EFFICIENCY; DECISION MAKERS; DECISION MAKING UNIT; GROUP DECISION MAKING; MULTIPLE INPUTS; PREFERENCE AGGREGATIONS; RELATIVE EFFICIENCY;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EFFICIENCY;

EID: 84868451308     PISSN: 0307904X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.038     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1978, 2:429-444.
2. Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W. Some methods for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 1984, 30:1078-1092.
3. Adler N., Friedman L., Sinuany-Stern Z. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2002, 140:249-265.
4. Andersen P., Petersen N.C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci 1993, 39:1261-1264.
5. Mehrabian S., Alirezaei M.R., Jahanshahloo G.R. A complete efficiency ranking of decision making units: An application to the teacher training university. Comput. Optim. Appl. 1998, 14:261-266.
6. Saati S., Zarafat M., Memariani A., Jahanshahloo G.R. A model for ranking decision making units in data envelopment analysis. Ricerca Operativa 2001, 31:47-59.
7. Chen Y. Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2005, 161:545-551.
8. Li X.B., Reeves G.R. A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1999, 115:507-517.
9. Bal H., Orkcu H.H., Celebioglu S. A new method based on the dispersion of weights in data envelopment analysis. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2008, 54:502-512.
10. Wang Y.M., Luo Y. A note on a new method based on the dispersion of weights in data envelopment analysis. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2009, 56:1703-1707.
11. Bal H., Orkcu H.H., Celebioglu S. Improving the discrimination power and weights dispersion in the data envelopment analysis. Comput. Oper. Res. 2010, 37:99-107.
12. T.R. Sexton, R.H. Silkman, A. Hogan, Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions, in: R.H. Silkman (Ed.), Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, Publication no. 32 in the series New Direction of Program Evaluation, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, 1986, pp. 73-105.
13. Doyle J., Green R. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1994, 45:567-578.
14. Wang Y.M., Chin K.S. A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension. Exp. Syst. Appl. 2010, 37:3666-3675.
15. Liang L., Wu J., Cook W.D., Zhu J. The DEA game cross-efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium. Oper. Res. 2008, 56:1278-1288.
16. Sinuany-Stern Z., Mehrez A., Hadad Y. An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 2000, 7:109-124.
17. Wu D. Performance evaluation: an integrated method using data envelopment analysis and fuzzy preference relations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2009, 194:227-235.
18. Zerafat Angiz M., Mustafa A., Emrouznejad A. Ranking efficient decision-making units in data envelopment analysis using fuzzy concept. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2010, 59:712-719.
19. Hashimoto A. A ranked voting system using a DEA/AR exclusion model: a note. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1997, 97:600-604.
20. Cook M., Kress A. A data envelopment model for aggregating preference rankings. Manage. Sci. 1990, 36:1302-1310.
21. Llamazares B., Peña T. Preference aggregation and DEA: An analysis of the methods proposed to discriminate efficient candidates. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2009, 197:714-721.
22. Zerafat Angiz M., Emrouznejad A., Mustafa A., Rashidi Komijan A. Selecting the most preferable alternatives in a group decision making problem using DEA. Exp. Syst. Appl. 2009, 36:9599-9602.
23. Zerafat Angiz M., Emrouznejad A., Mustafa A., Al-Eraqi A.S. Aggregating preference ranking with fuzzy data envelopment analysis. Knowledge-Based Syst. 2010, 23:512-519.
24. Wu J., Liang L., Zha Y., Yang F. Determination of cross-efficiency under the principle of rank priority evaluation. Exp. Syst. Appl. 2009, 36:4826-4829.
25. Sherman H.D., Gold F. Bank branch operating efficiency: evaluation with DEA. J. Bank Finance 1985, 9:297-315.
26. Linton J.D., Walsh S.T., Morabito J. Analysis, ranking and selection of R&D projects in a portfolio. R & D Manage. 2002, 32:139-148.
27. Sadhu A., Chakraborty S. Non-traditional machining processes selection using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Exp. Syst. Appl. 2011, 38:8770-8781.
28. Yang H.H., Chang C.Y. Using DEA window analysis to measure efficiencies of Taiwan's integrated telecommunication firms. Telecommun. Policy 2009, 33:98-108.