Externalities, NIMBY syndrome and marble quarrying activity

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 55, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1192-1205

  Pelekasi, T ^a   Menegaki, M ^b   Damigos, D ^b  

^a Mining Engineer Metallurgist   (Greece)

^b NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

contingent valuation; marble quarrying; NIMBY; willingness to accept

Indexed keywords

COMPENSATION SYSTEM; CONTINGENT VALUATION; HUMAN ACTIVITY; MARBLE; NOT IN MY BACK YARD RESPONSE; QUARRYING;

EID: 84868319054     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2011.638047     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Alberini, A. 2007. Paying for permanence: public preferences for contaminated site cleanup. Journal of risk and uncertainty, 34(2): 155-178.
2. Alheim, M. and Bucholz, W. 2000. WTP or WTA-is that the question? Reflections on the difference between 'willingness to pay' and 'willingness to accept'. Zeitschrift für umweltpolitik und umweltrecht, 23: 253-271.
3. Alvarez-Farizo, B. 1999. Estimating the benefits of agri-environmental policy: econometric issues in open-ended contingent valuation studies. Journal of environmental planning and management, 42(1): 23-43.
4. Bateman, I. J. 2002. Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: a manual, Northampton: Edward Elgar.
5. Carson, R. T. and Hanemann, W. M. 2005. "Contingent valuation". In Handbook of environmental economics. Valuing environmental changes, Edited by: Mäler, K. G. and Vincent, J. R. Vol 2, 821-936. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
6. Carson, R. T. 1998. Referendum design and contingent valuation: the NOAA panel's no-vote recommendation. The review of economics and statistics, 80(2): 335-338.
7. ELSTAT. 2010. Statistical Database [online] Available from www.statistics.gr [Accessed July 2010] (in Greek)
8. Ferreira, S. and Gallagher, L. 2010. Protest responses and community attitudes toward accepting compensation to host waste disposal infrastructure. Land use policy, 27(2): 638-652.
9. Frey, B., Oberholzer-Gee, F. and Eichenberger, R. 1996. The old lady visits your backyard: a tale of morals and markets. Journal of political economy, 104(6): 1297-1313.
10. Gayer, T., Hamilton, J. and Viscusi, W. K. 2002. The market value of reducing cancer risk: hedonic housing prices with changing information. Southern economic journal, 69(2): 266-289.
11. Groothuis, P. and Miller, G. 1994. Locating hazardous waste facilities: the influence of NIMBY beliefs. American journal of economics and sociology, 53(3): 335-346.
12. Groothuis, P. A., Groothuis, J. D. and Whitehead, J. C. 2008. Green vs. green: measuring the compensation required to site electrical generation windmills in a viewshed. Energy policy, 36(4): 1545-1550.
13. Haab, T. and McConnell, K. 2002. Valuing environmental and natural resources: the econometrics of non-market valuation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
14. Hackl, E. and Pruckner, G. J. 1999. On the gap between payment card and closed-ended CVM-answers. Applied economics, 31(6): 733-742.
15. Haener, M. and Adamowicz, W. 1998. Analysis of 'don't know' responses to referendum contingent valuation questions. Agricultural and resource economics review, 27(2): 218-230.
16. Halsted, J. M., Luloff, A. E. and Stevens, T. H. 1992. Protest bidders in contingent valuation. Northeastern journal of agricultural and resource economics, 21: 160-169.
17. Hanemann, M. W. 1991. Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ?. American economic review, 81(3): 635-647.
18. Horowitz, J. K. and McConnell, K. E. 2002. A review of WTA/WTP studies. Journal of environmental economics and management, 44(3): 426-447.
19. Imber, D., Stevenson, G. and Wilks, L. A contingent valuation survey of the Kakadu Conservation Zone. RAC Research Paper N.3, February. Canberra: Resources Assessment Commission.
20. Jorgensen, B. S. and Syme, G. J. 2000. Protest responses and willingness to pay: attitude toward paying for stormwater pollution abatement. Ecological economics, 33(2): 251-265.
21. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47(2): 263-291.
22. Kontoleon, A. and Swanson, T. M. 2003. The WTP for property rights for the Giant Panda: can a charismatic species be an instrument for nature conservation?. Land economics, 79(4): 483-499.
23. Kriström, B. 1997. Spike models in contingent valuation. American journal of agricultural economics, 79(3): 1013-1023.
24. Kunreuther, H., Kleindofer, P. and Knez, P. J. 1987. A compensation mechanism for siting noxious facilities: theory and experimental design. Journal of environmental economics and management, 14(4): 371-383.
25. London Economics. 1998. The environmental costs and benefits of the supply of aggregates, Report to the Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions. London: DETR.
26. London Economics. 1999. The environmental costs and benefits of the supply of aggregates (Phase 2), Report to the Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions. London: DETR.
27. Mendonca, A. and Tilton, J. 2000. A contingent valuation study of the environmental costs of mining in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of minerals and energy, 15(1): 21-32.
28. Menegaki, M. and Kaliampakos, D. 2006. Landscape analysis as a tool for surface mining design. Environment and planning B: planning and design, 33(2): 185-196.
29. Milgrom, T. 2008. Environmental aspects of rehabilitating abandoned quarries: Israel as a case study. Landscape and urban planning, 87(3): 172-179.
30. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 1993. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register, 58/10: 4602-4614.
31. Pemberton, C. A., Harris-Charles, E. and Patterson-Andrews, H. 2010. Cultural bias in contingent valuation of copper mining in the Commonwealth of Dominica. Ecological economics, 70(1): 19-23.
32. Reiser, B. and Shechter, M. 1999. Incorporating zero values in the economic valuation of environmental program benefits. Environmetrics, 10(1): 87-101.
33. Schively, C. 2007. Understanding the NIMBY and LULU phenomena: reassessing our knowledge base and informing future research. Journal of planning literature, 21(3): 255-266.
34. Strazzera, E. 2003. The effect of protest votes on the estimates of WTP for use values of recreational sites. Environmental and resource economics, 25(4): 461-476.
35. Venkatachalam, L. 2004. The contingent valuation method: a review. Environmental impact assessment review, 24(1): 89-124.
36. Willis, K. G. and Garrod, G. D. 1999. Externalities from extraction of aggregates-regulation by tax or land-use controls. Resources policy, 25(2): 77-86.