Externalities from extraction of aggregates regulation by tax or land-use controls

Resources Policy

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 77-86

  Willis, K G ^a   Garrod, G D ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Externalities; Land use controls; Quarries; Stated preference; Tax

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; LAND USE; QUARRYING; TAX SYSTEM;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0032741415     PISSN: 03014207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4207(99)00012-4     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Adamowicz W.L., Boxall P., Williams M., Louviere J.J. Stated preference approaches to measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 80:1998;64-75.
2. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P., Leamer, E., Radner, R., Schuman, H., 1993. Report of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register 58 (10), 4016-4614, 15 January.
3. Bates, R., 1998. Taxing times ahead for quarrymen. Planning 23 January.
4. Bovenberg A.L., van der Ploeg F. Consequences of environmental tax reform for unemployment and welfare. Environmental and Resource Economics. 12(2):1998;137-150.
5. Burrows P. The Economics of Pollution Control. 1979;Martin Robertson, Oxford.
6. The Environmental Costs and Benefits of the Supply of Aggregates. Report by London Economics. 1998;DETR, London.
7. Minerals Planning Guidance 1: General Considerations and the Development Plan System. 1998;HMSO, London.
8. Minerals Planning Guidance 2: Applications, Permissions and Conditions. 1988;HMSO, London.
9. Minerals Planning Guidance 11: The Control of Noise at Surface Minerals Workings. 1993;HMSO, London.
10. County Durham Minerals Local Plan. 1997;Durham County Council, Durham.
11. Blue Print for a Green Budget. 1997;FoE, London.
12. Garrod G.D., Willis K.G. Economic Valuation of the Environment. 1999;Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
13. Hanemann W.M. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 66:1984;332-341.
14. HM Treasury, 1999. Reducing the Environmental Impact of Quarrying. http:/www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/budget99/nr/hmt8.txt.
15. Johansson P.-O. Cost Benefit Analysis of Environmental Change. 1993;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. London Economics, 1999. The Environmental Costs and Benefits of the Supply of Aggregates. Report to the Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions. DETR, London.
17. McConnell K.E. Consumer surplus from discrete choice models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 29:1995;263-270.
18. Oates W.E. Green taxes - can we protect the environment and improve the tax system at the same time. Southern Economic Journal. 61(4):1995;915-922.
19. O'Riordan T. Ecotaxation. 1997;Earthscan, London.
20. Schob R. Evaluating tax reforms in the presence of externalities. Oxford Economic Papers. 48(4):1996;537-555.
21. Spackman M. Hypothecation; a view from the Treasury. O'Riordan T. Ecotaxation. 1997;45-51 Earthscan, London.
22. Turner R.K., Perrings C., Folke C. Ecological economics: paradigm or perspective. van den Bergh J.C.J.M., van der Straaten J. Economy and Ecosystems in Change. 1997;25-49 Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.