Mental Fatigue Affects Visual Selective Attention

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 10, 2012, Pages

  Faber, Léon G ^a,b   Maurits, Natasha M ^b   Lorist, Monicque M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSTHYMIA; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; RESPONSE TIME; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ATTENTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL FATIGUE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84868277609     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048073     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. van der Linden D, Frese M, Meijman TF, (2003) Mental fatigue and the control of cognitive processes: effects on perseveration and planning. Acta Psychol (Amst) 113: 45-65.
2. van der Linden D (2011) The urge to stop: the cognitive and biological nature of acute mental fatigue. In: Ackerman PL, editor. Cognitive fatigue: multidisciplinary perspectives on current research and future applications. Washington: American Psychological Association. 149-164.
3. Meijman TF, (1997) Mental fatigue and the efficiency of information processing in relation to work times. Int J Ind Ergon 20: 31-38.
4. Bartlett FC, (1943) Ferrier lecture: fatigue following highly skilled work. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 131: 247-257.
5. van der Linden D, Eling P, (2006) Mental fatigue disturbs local processing more than global processing. Psychol Res 70: 395-402.
6. Boksem MAS, Meijman TF, Lorist MM, (2005) Effects of mental fatigue on attention: an ERP study. Cognitive brain research 25: 106-117.
7. Eason RG, (1981) Visual evoked potential correlates of early neural filtering during selective attention. Bull Psychon Soc 18: 203-206.
8. Harter MR, Aine CJ (1984) Brain mechanisms of visual selective attention. In: Parasuramaran R, Davies D, editors. Varieties of attention.: Academic Press. 293-321.
9. Hillyard SA, Mangun GR (1987) Commentary: sensory gating as a physiological mechanism for visual selective attention. In: Johnson R, Rohrbaugh J, Parasuramaran R, editors. Current trends in event-related potential research (eeg suppl. 40).: Elsevier. 138-145.
10. Hillyard SA, Vogel EK, Luck SJ, (1998) Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electro-physiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353: 1257-1270.
11. Gazzaley A, Cooney JW, McEvoy K, Knight RT, D'Esposito M, (2005) Top-down enhancement and suppression of the magnitude and speed of neural activity. J Cogn Neurosci 17: 507-517.
12. Kim YJ, Grabowecky M, Paller KA, Muthu K, Suzuki S, (2007) Attention induces synchronization-based response gain in steady-state visual evoked potentials. Nat Neurosci 10: 117-125.
13. Ito M, Gilbert CD, (1999) Attention modulates contextual influences in the primary visual cortex of alert monkeys. Neuron 22: 593-604.
14. McAdams CJ, Maunsel JH, (1999) Effects of attention on orientation-tuning functions of single neurons in macaque cortical area v4. J Neurosci 19: 431-441.
15. Mehta AD, Ulbert I, Schroeder CE, (2000) Intermodal selective attention in monkeys. Distribution and timing of effects across visual areas. Cereb Cortex 10: 343-358.
16. Motter BC, (1993) Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas v1, v2 and v4 in the presence of competing stimuli. J Neurophysiol 70: 909-919.
17. Roelfsema PR, Lamme VA, Spekreijse H, (1998) Object-based attention in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. Nature 395: 376-381.
18. Vidyasagar TR, (1998) Gating of neuronal responses in macaque primary visual cortex by an attentional spotlight. Neuroreport 9: 1947-1952.
19. Brefczynski JA, DeYoe EA, (1999) A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention. Nat Neurosci 2: 370-374.
20. Martínez A, Anllo-Vento L, Sereno MI, Frank LR, Buxton RB, et al. (1999) Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention. Nat Neurosci 2: 364-369.
21. Shulman GL, Corbetta M, Buckner RL, Raichle ME, Fiez JA, et al. (1997) Top-down modulation of early sensory cortex. Cereb Cortex 7: 193-206.
22. Somers DC, Dale AM, Seiffert AE, Tootell RBH, (1999) Functional mri reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 1663-1668.
23. Tootell RBH, Hadjikhani N, Hall EK, Marrett S, Vanduffel W, et al. (1998) The retinotopy of visual spatial attention. Neuron 21: 1409-1422.
24. Di Russo F, Martínez A, Hillyard SA, (2003) Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention. Cereb Cortex 13: 486-499.
25. Martínez A, Di Russo F, Anllo-Vento L, Sereno MI, Buxton RB, et al. (2001) Putting spatial attention on the map: timing and localization of stimulus selection processes in striate and extrastriate visual areas. Vision Res 41: 1437-1457.
26. Jehee JFM, Lamme VAF, Roelfsema PR, (2007) Boundary assignment in a recurrent network architecture. Vision Res 47: 1153-1165.
27. Lamme VAF, (1995) The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 15: 1605-1615.
28. Lamme VAF, Rodriguez-Rodriguez V, Spekreijse H, (1999) Separate processing dynamics for texture elements, boundaries and surfaces in primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. Cereb Cortex 9: 406-413.
29. Roelfsema PR, Lamme VAF, Spekreijse H, Bosch H, (2002) Figure-ground segregation in a recurrent network architecture. J Cogn Neurosci 14: 525-537.
30. Smith AT, Singh KD, Williams AL, Greenlee MW, (2001) Estimating Receptive Field Size from fMRI Data in Human Striate and Extrastriate Visual Cortex. Cereb Cortex 11: 1182-1190.
31. Scholte HS, Jolij J, Fahernfort JJ, Lamme VAF, (2008) Feedforward and recurrent processing in scene segmentation: electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Cogn Neurosci 20: 2097-2109.
32. Eriksen BA, Eriksen CW, (1974) Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nosearch task. Percept Psychophys 16: 143-149.
33. Busch NA, Debener S, Kranczioch C, Engel AK, Herrmann CS, (2004) Size matters: effects of stimulus size, duration and eccentricity on the visual gamma-band response. Clin Neurophysiol 115: 1810-1820.
34. Roelfsema PR, Lamme VAF, Spekreijse H, Bosch H, (2002) Figure-ground segregation in a recurrent network architecture. J Cogn Neurosci 14: 525-537.
35. Ratcliff R, McKoon G, (2008) The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks. Neural Comput 20: 873-922.
36. Aine CJ, Supek S, George JS, Ranken D, Lewine J, et al. (1996) Retinotopic organization of human visual cortex: departures from the classical model. Cereb Cortex 6: 354-361.
37. Clark VP, Fan S, Hillyard SA, (1995) Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses. Hum Brain Mapp 2: 170-187.
38. Zijlstra FRH, Van Doorn L (1985) The construction of a subjective effort scale.
39. Gratton G, Coles MGH, Donchin E, (1983) A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 55: 468-484.
40. Lorist MM, Faber LG (2011) Consideration of the influence of mental fatigue on controlled and automatic cognitive processes and related neuromodulatory effects. In: Phillip L Ackerman, editor. Cognitive fatigue: multidisciplinary perspectives on current research and future applications. Washington: American Psychological Association. 105-126.
41. Kornblum S, Hasbroucq T, Osman A, (1990) Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility- A model and taxonomy. Psychol Rev 97: 253-270.
42. Ridderinkhof KR (1997) Commentary on Lu: A dual-route processing architecture for stimulus-response correspondence effects. In: Hommel B, Prinz W, editors. Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. 119-131.
43. Verleger R, Jaśkowski P, Wascher E, (2005) Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception. J Psychophysiol 19: 165-181.
44. McCarthy G, Donchin E, (1981) A metric for thought: A comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science 211: 77-80.