Cognitive processes underlying spatial belief revision

Expanding the Space of Cognitive Science - Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 3477-3482

  Bucher, Leandra ^a   Krumnack, Antje ^a   Nejasmic, Jelica ^a   Knauff, Markus ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

belief revision; mental models; relational reasoning; spatial cognition; Spatial reasoning; spatial relations

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

'CURRENT; BELIEF REVISION; COGNITIVE PROCESS; MENTAL MODEL; REASONERS; RELATIONAL REASONING; SPATIAL COGNITION; SPATIAL MODELLING; SPATIAL REASONING; SPATIAL RELATIONS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84868249319     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Byrne, R. M. J. (1998). Spatial mental models in counterfactual thinking about what might have been. Kognitionswissenschaft, 7, 19-26.
2. DeVooght, G, & Vandierendonck, A. (1998). Spatial mental models in linear reasoning. Kognitionswissenschaft, 7, 5-10.
3. Gärdenfors, P. (1984) Epistemic importance and minimal changes of belief. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 62, 136-157.
4. Goodwin, G and Johnson-Laird, P.N. (2005) Reasoning about relations. Psychological Review, 112, 468-493.
5. Harman, G. (1986). Change in view: Principles of reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Johnson-Laird, P. N, Legrenzi, P., & Girotto, V. (2004). How we detect logical inconsistencies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 41-45.
7. Klauer, K. C. (1998). Visuelle und räumliche Interferenzen beim Schlussfolgern. Kognitionswissenschaft, 7, 11-18.
8. Knauff, M., Rauh, R, & Schlieder, C. (1995). Preferred mental models in qualitative spatial reasoning: A cognitive assessment of Allen's calculus. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 200-205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Knauff, M., Rauh, R., Schlieder, C, & Strube, G (1998). Continuity Effect and Figurai Bias in Spatial Relational Inference. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 573-578). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Mam, K, & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). The mental representation of spatial descriptions. Memory & Cognition, 10, 181-187.
11. Mller, G.A. & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1976). Language and Perception. Cambridge: Havard University Press.
12. Payne, S. J., & Baguley, T. (2006). Memory for the process of constructing an integrated mental model. Memory & Cognition, 34, 817-825.
13. Payne, S. J. (1993). Memory for mental models of spatial descriptions: An episodic construction trace account. Memory & Cognition, 21, 591-603.
14. Ragm, M., Knauff, M., & Nebel, B. (2005). A computational model for spatial reasoning with mental models. In: B. Bara, B. Barsalou, and M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Cognitive Science Conference (pp. 1064-1070). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Rauh, R., Schlieder, C, & Knauff, M. (1997). Präferierte mentale Modelle beim räumlich-relationalen Schließen: Empirie und kognitive Modellierung. Kognitionswissenschaft, 6, 21-34.
16. Schaeken, W., Girotto, V., & Johnson Laird, P. N. (1998). The effect of an irrelevant premise on temporal and spatial reasoning. Kognitionswissenschaft, 7, 27-32.
17. Wolf, A. G & Knauff, M. (2008). The strategy behind belief revision: A matter of judging probability or the use of mental models? In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 831-836). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.