The stroop task: Comparison between the original paradigm and computerized versions in children and adults

Clinical Neuropsychologist

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1142-1153

  Penner, Iris Katharina ^a,b   Kobel, Maja ^a   Stcklin, Markus ^a   Weber, Peter ^b   Opwis, Klaus ^a   Calabrese, Pasquale ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Adults; Children; Computerized Stroop versions; Interference; Neuropsychology; Stroop task

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; STANDARD; STROOP TEST;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; STROOP TEST; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84868246511     PISSN: 13854046     EISSN: 17444144     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2012.713513     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11, 63-65.
2. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
3. Kindt, M., Bierman, D., & Brosschot, J. F. (1996). Stroop versus Stroop: Comparison of a card format and a single-trial format of the standard color-word Stroop task and the emotional Stroop task. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(5), 653-661.
4. Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological Assessment (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
6. MacLeod, C. M. (2005). The Stroop task in clinical research. In A. Wenzel & D. C. Rubin (Eds.), Cognitive methods and their application to clinical research (pp. 41-62). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
7. MacLeod, C. M., & MacDonald, P. A. (2000). Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: Uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 383-391.
8. Mead, L. A., Mayer, A. R., Bobholz, J. A., Woodley, S. J., Cunningham, J. M., Hammeke, T. A., et al. (2002). Neural basis of the Stroop interference task: Response competition or selective attention? Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 735-742.
9. Regard, M. (1981). Cognitive rigidity and flexibility: A neuropsychological study. Victoria BC, Canada: University of Victoria
10. Shilling, V. M., Chetwynd, A., & Rabbitt, P. M. (2002). Individual inconsistency across measures of inhibition: An investigation of the construct validity of inhibition in older adults. Neuropsychologia, 40, 605-619.
11. Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. Strauss, G. P., Allen, D. N., Jorgensen, M. L., & Cramer, S. L. (2005). Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional Stroop tasks: An investigation of color-word and pictureword versions. Assessment, 12, 330-337.
13. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
14. Zysset, S., Mü ller, K., Lohmann, G., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). Color-word matching Stroop task: Separating interference and response conflict. Neuroimage, 13, 29-36.
15. Cattell, JM. 1886. The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11: 63-65.
16. Cohen, JD, Dunbar, K, and, McClelland, JL. 1990. On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97: 332-361.
17. Kindt, M, Bierman, D, and, Brosschot, JF. 1996. Stroop versus Stroop: Comparison of a card format and a single-trial format of the standard color-word Stroop task and the emotional Stroop task. Personality and Individual Differences, 21 (5): 653-661.
18. Lezak, MD, Howieson, DB, and, Loring, DW. 2004. Neuropsychological Assessment, 4th, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19. MacLeod, CM. 1991. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109: 163-203.
20. MacLeod, CM. 2005. The Stroop task in clinical research. In Cognitive methods and their application to clinical research, Edited by: Wenzel, A and Rubin, DC. 41-62. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. MacLeod, CM, and, MacDonald, PA. 2000. Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: Uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4: 383-391.
22. Mead, LA, Mayer, AR, Bobholz, JA, Woodley, SJ, Cunningham, JM, Hammeke, TA. 2002. Neural basis of the Stroop interference task: Response competition or selective attention?. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8: 735-742.
23. Regard, M. 1981. Cognitive rigidity and flexibility: A neuropsychological study, Victoria BC, Canada: University of Victoria.
24. Shilling, VM, Chetwynd, A, and, Rabbitt, PM. 2002. Individual inconsistency across measures of inhibition: An investigation of the construct validity of inhibition in older adults. Neuropsychologia, 40: 605-619.
25. Spreen, O, and, Strauss, E. 1998. A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26. Strauss, GP, Allen, DN, Jorgensen, ML, and, Cramer, SL. 2005. Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional Stroop tasks: An investigation of color-word and picture-word versions. Assessment, 12: 330-337.
27. Stroop, JR. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18: 643-662.
28. Zysset, S, Mller, K, Lohmann, G, and, von Cramon, DY. 2001. Color-word matching Stroop task: Separating interference and response conflict. Neuroimage, 13: 29-36.