A review of social sustainability considerations among EU-approved voluntary schemes for biofuels, with implications for rural livelihoods

Energy Policy

Volumn 51, Issue , 2012, Pages 765-778

  German, Laura ^a   Schoneveld, George ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Biofuels; Certification; Renewable Energy Directive (RED)

Indexed keywords

BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; CERTIFICATION; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; CRITICAL ISSUES; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; EUROPEAN UNION; FEEDSTOCK PRODUCTION; RAPID EXPANSION; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; RURAL LIVELIHOOD; SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABILITY CRITERIA; SUSTAINABILITY POLICY;

BIOFUELS;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ALTERNATIVE FUEL; BIOFUEL; ENERGY POLICY; EUROPEAN UNION; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; RURAL ENERGY; SUSTAINABILITY;

EUROPE;

EID: 84868206402     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.022     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Abengoa Bioenergy, 2011. RED Bioenergy Sustainability Assurance Scheme. Online: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/biofuels/sustainability_%20schemes_en.htm.
2. Afionis S., Stringer L.C. European Union leadership in biofuels regulation: Europe as a normative power?. Journal of Cleaner Production 2012, 32(2012):114-123.
3. AU/AfDB/UNECA Framework and Guidelines for Land Policy in Africa 2009, African Union, African Development Bank and UN Economic Commission for Africa.
4. Atanasiu S. The Role of Bioenergy in the National Renewable Energy Action Plans: A First Identification of Issues and Uncertainties 2010, IEEP, London.
5. Baker D.C., McLelland J.N. Evaluating the effectiveness of British Columbia's environmental assessment process for first nations' participation in mining development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2003, 23(5):581-603.
6. Barrientos S., Smith S. Do workers benefit from ethical trade? Assessing codes of labor practice in global production systems. Third World Quarterly 2007, 28(4):713-729.
7. BBSVS, 2011. 2BSvs Biomass Biofuels Sustainability Voluntary Scheme. Online: http://ec.europa.eu/%20energy/%20renewables/biofuels/sustainability_schemes_en.htm.
8. Benoît, C., Vickery-Niederman, G., 2010. Social Sustainability Assessment Literature Review. Sustainability Consortium White Paper #102. The Sustainability Consortium, Arizona State University and University of Arkansas. Tempe, Arizona Fayetteville, Arkansas.
9. BMZ, 2009. Development Policy Stance on the Topic of Land Grabbing-The Purchase and Leasing of Large Areas of Land in Developing Countries. Discourse 015. Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, Bonn and Berlin.
10. Bonsucro, 2011. Bonsucro Production Standard (Version 3.0), Including Bonsucro EU Production Standard. Online: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/biofuels/sustainability_schemes_en.htm.
11. Bowyer, C., 2010. Anticipated Indirect Land Use Change Associated With Expanded Use of Biofuels and Bioliquids in the EU-An Analysis of the National Renewable Energy Action Plans. IEEP, London.
12. Cashmore M., Richardson T., Hilding-Ryedvik T., Emmelin L. Evaluating the effectiveness of impact assessment instruments: theorising the nature and implications of their political constitution. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2010, 30(6):371-379.
13. Cashore B., Auld G., Bernstein S., McDermott C. Can non-state governance 'ratchet up' global environmental standards? Lessons from the forest sector. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 2007, 16(2):158-172.
14. CCJDP, 2006. Growing Poverty: The Impact of Out-Grower Schemes on Poverty in Zambia. The Catholic Centre for Justice, Development and Peace, Lusaka.
15. Charnovitz, S., Earley, J., Howse, R., 2008. An Examination of Social Standards in Biofuels Sustainability Criteria. IPC Discussion Paper-Standards Series. International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council, Washington, D.C.
16. Colchester M. Self-determination or environmental determinism for indigenous peoples in tropical forest conservation?. Conservation Biology 2000, 14(5):1365-1367.
17. European Commission-EC, 2008. Staff Working Document-Annex to Impact Assessment. SEC(2008) 85. European Commission, Brussels.
18. Cotula, L., Dyer, N., Vermeulen, S., 2008. Fuelling Exclusion? The Biofuels Boom and Poor People's Access to Land. IIED, London and FAO, Rome.
19. De Schutter O. Large-scale Land Acquisitions and Leases: A Set of Core Principles and Measures to Address the Human Rights Challenge 2009, UN Economic Commission for Africa, Addis Ababa.
20. Eba'a Atyi, R., Simula, M., 2002. Forest Certification: Pending Challenges for Tropical Timber. ITTO Technical Series 19.
21. European Commission, 2004. EU Land Policy Guidelines. EU Task Force on Land Tenure. European Commission, Brussels.
22. European Commission Renewable Energy Road Map; Renewable Energies in the 21st Century: Building a More Sustainable Future 2007, European Commission, Brussels.
23. European Commission, 2009. Directive 2009/28/EC of The European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources and Amending and Subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/%20LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:140:0016:0062:EN:PDF.
24. European Commission, 2011a. Summary Report: Second Meeting of the Committee on the Sustainability of Biofuels and Bioliquids. May 27, Brussels.
25. European Commission, 2011b. Memo: Certification Schemes for Biofuels. MEMO/11/522. July 19, Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/11/522&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en.
26. European Commission, 2012. Impact Assessment Accompanying the Document, "Communication from the Commission to The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: 'Renewable energy: a major player in the European energy market'". SWD(2012) 149 Final. European Commission, Brussels.
27. FAO, 2008a. Soaring Food Prices: Facts, Perspectives, Impacts and Actions Required. Document HLC/08/INF/1, Prepared for the 'High-Level Conference on World Food Security: The Challenges of Climate Change and Bioenergy'. 3-5 June, 2008, Rome.
28. FAO The State of Food and Agriculture. Biofuels: Prospects, Risks and Opportunities 2008, FAO, Rome.
29. FAO, 2012. Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
30. FAO/IFAD/UNCTAD/World Bank, 2010. Principles for Responsible Agricultural Investment That Respects Rights, Livelihoods and Resources.
31. Fargione J., Hill J., Tilman D., Polasky S., Hawthorne P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 2008, 319(5867):1235-1238.
32. Foot D.K., Ross S. Social sustainability. Teaching Business Sustainability: From Theory to Practice 2004, 107-125. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK. C. Galea (Ed.).
33. German L.A., Schoneveld G.C., Gumbo D. The local social and environmental impacts of smallholder-based biofuel investments in Zambia. Ecology and Society 2011, 16(4):12. Available at: 〈http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss4/art12/〉 (accessed 25.07.12).
34. German, L., Schoneveld, G., Mwangi, E., 2011b. Contemporary Processes of Large-Scale Land Acquisition by Investors: Cases From Sub-Saharan Africa. CIFOR Occasional Paper no. 68. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
35. German L., Schoneveld G., Pacheco P. The local social and environmental impacts of biofuels: a global comparative assessment and implications for governance. Ecology and Society 2011, 16(4):29. Available at: 〈http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss4/art29/〉 (accessed 25.07.12).
36. Global Reporting Initiative-GRI, 2011. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, Version 3.1 (2000-2011). GRI, Amsterdam. Available at: (accessed 08.09.11). http://www.globalreporting.org/NR/rdonlyres/53984807-9E9B-4B9F-B5E8-77667F35CC83/0/G31GuidelinesinclTechnicalProtocolFinal.pdf.
37. Glover D., Kusterer K. Small Farmers, Big Business: Contract Farming and Rural Development 1990, Macmillan, London.
38. Greenergy, 2011a. Greenergy Bioethanol Sustainability Criteria for Brazilian Sugarcane. Online: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/biofuels/sustainability_schemes_en.htm.
39. Greenergy, 2011b. Greenergy Brazilian Bioethanol Verification Program: System Description. Online: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/biofuels/sustainability_schemes_en.htm.
40. ILO, 1981. Occupational Safety and Health and the Working Environment. ILO, Geneva. Online: http://www.ilo.org/ilolex/cgi-lex/convde.pl?C155.
41. ILO, 1989. Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention. ILO, Geneva. Online: http://www.ilo.org/%20ilolex/cgi-lex/convde.pl?C169.
42. ILO, 1998. Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. International Labor Organization, Rome. Online: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---declaration/documents/publication/wcms_095898.pdf.
43. ISCC, 2011a. ISCC 252: Regulations to Carry out Audits. International Sustainability and Carbon Certification. Online: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/biofuels/sustainability_schemes_%20en.htm.
44. ISCC, 2011b. ISCC 202: Sustainability Requirements for the Production of Biomass. International Sustainability and Carbon Certification. Online: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/biofuels/sustainability_schemes_en.htm.
45. ISCC, 2011c. ISCC 201: System Basics. International Sustainability and Carbon Certification. Online: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/biofuels/sustainability_schemes_en.htm.
46. ISO, 2010. ISO 26 000: Guidance on Social Responsibility. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. Online: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/management_standards/social_responsibility.htm.
47. Janssen R., Rutz D.D. Sustainability of biofuels in Latin America: risks and opportunities. Energy Policy 2011, 39(10):5717-5725.
48. Jay S., Jones C., Slinn P., Wood C. Environmental impact assessment: retrospect and prospect. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2007, 27(4):287-300.
49. Jumbe C.B.L. Biofuels development in Sub-Saharan Africa: are the policies conducive?. Energy Policy 2009, 37(11):4980-4986.
50. Klooster D. Environmental certification of forests in Mexico: the political ecology of a nongovernmental market intervention. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2006, 96(3):541-565.
51. Koh L.P., Wilcove D.S. Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity?. Conservation Letters 2008, 1(2):60-64.
52. Lapola D.M., Schaldacha R., Alcamoa J., Bondeaud A., Kocha J., Koelkinga C., Priess J.A. Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010, 107(8):3388-3393.
53. Liversage, H., 2011. Responding to 'Land Grabbing' and Promoting Responsible Investment in Agriculture. IFAD Occasional Paper 2. International Fund for Agricultural Development, Rome.
54. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2011. Biofuels: Ethical Issues. Available at: (accessed 03.09.12). http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/biofuels-0.
55. OECD/FAO OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2010-2019 2010, OECD, Paris.
56. Pleven R.J., O'Hare M., Jones A.D., Torn M.S., Gibbs H.K. Greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels' indirect land use change are uncertain but may be much greater than previously estimated. Environmental Science and Technology 2010, 44:8015-8021.
57. Rametsteiner E., Simula M. Forest certification: an instrument to promote sustainable forest management?. Journal of Environmental Management 2003, 67(1):87-98.
58. Rosegrant M.W. Biofuels and Grain Prices: Impacts and Policy Responses 2008, IFPRI, Washington, D.C.
59. RSB, 2010a. Consolidated RSB EU RED Principles and Criteria for Sustainable Biofuel Production. Roundtable for Sustainable Biofuels. Online: http://rsb.epfl.ch/page-24929-en.html.
60. RSB, 2010b. Indicators of Compliance for the RSB EU RED Principles and Criteria. Roundtable for Sustainable Biofuels. Online: http://rsb.epfl.ch/page-24929-en.html.
61. RSB, 2011a. RSB Land Rights Guidelines. Roundtable for Sustainable Biofuels. Online: http://rsb.epfl.ch/page-24929-en.html.
62. RSB, 2011b. RSB Screening Tool. Roundtable for Sustainable Biofuels. Online: http://rsb.epfl.ch/page-24929-en.html.
63. RTRS, 2010. RTRS Standard for Responsible Soy Production, Version 1.0. Online: http://www.responsiblesoy.org/index.php?lang=en.
64. RTRS, 2011a. RTRS EU RED Compliance Requirements for Producers, Version 3.0. Roundtable on Responsible Soy Association. Online: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/biofuels/sustainability_schemes_en.htm.
65. RTRS, 2011b. RTRS EU RED Scheme: System Description, Version 2.0. Roundtable on Responsible Soy Association. Online: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/biofuels/sustainability_schemes_en.htm.
66. Scarlat N., Dallemand J.-F. Recent developments of biofuels/bioenergy sustainability certification: a global overview. Energy Policy 2011, 39(2011):1630-1646.
67. Schut M., Slingerland M., Locke A. Biofuel developments in Mozambique: update and analysis of policy, potential and reality. Energy Policy 2010, 38(9):5151-5165.
68. Taylor M., Bending T. Increasing Commercial Pressure on Land: Building a Coordinated Response 2009, International Land Coalition, Rome.
69. UN Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery, the Slave Trade, and Institutions and Practices Similar to Slavery 1956, United Nations, Geneva.
70. UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966, United Nations, New York.
71. UN International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1966, United Nations, New York.
72. UN Basic Principles and Guidelines on Development-Based Evictions and Displacement. A/HRC/4/18 2007, United Nations, New York.
73. UN (2007b) United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. United Nations, New York.
74. UNEP/SETAC, 2010. Methodological Sheets for 31 Sub-Categories of Impact. UN Environment Program and the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Nairobi and Brussels. Online: http://lcinitiative.unep.fr/default.asp?site=lcinit&page_id=A8992620-AAAD-4B81-9BAC-A72AEA281CB9.
75. U.S. Congress, 2007. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. Online: http://energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=IssueItems.Detail&IssueItem_ID=f10ca3dd-fabd-4900-aa9d-c19de47df2da&Month=12&Year=2007.
76. USDA, 2011. EU-27 Annual Biofuels Report. USDA FAS, The Hague.
77. Vermeulen, S., Cotula, L., 2010. Making the Most of Agricultural Investment: A Survey of Business Models That Provide Opportunities for Smallholders. FAO, Rome and IIED, London.
78. World Bank Environmental Assessment Sourcebook, Volume I: Policies, Procedures and Cross-Sectoral Issues 1991, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
79. World Bank Environmental Assessments and National Action Plans 1996, World Bank, Washington, D.C., Online: 〈http://lnweb90.worldbank.org/oed/oeddoclib.nsf/DocUNIDViewForJavaSearch/1824B4F1BC97439F852567F5005D8DFF〉.
80. World Bank OP 4.01-Environmental Assessment 1999, World Bank, Washington, D.C., Online: 〈http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTS/EXTPOLICIES/EXTOPMANUAL/0, contentMDK:20064724~menuPK:64701633~pagePK:64709096~piPK:64709108~theSitePK:502184, 00.html〉.
81. World Commission on Environment and Development-WCED, 1987. Our Common Future. The Brundtland Report. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
82. Wynne R.D. The emperor's new eco-logos?: a critical review of the scientific certification systems Environmental Report Card and the Green Seal certification mark programs. Virginia Environmental Law Journal 1994, 14:51-149.
83. Yang H., Zhou Y., Liu J. Land and water requirements of biofuel and implications for food supply and the environment in China. Energy Policy 2009, 37(5):1876-1885.
84. Zhang Z.X. Asian energy and environmental policy: promoting growth while preserving the environment. Energy Policy 2008, 36(10):3905-3924.
85. Zhu D., Ru J. Strategic environmental assessment in China: motivations, politics, and effectiveness. Journal of Environmental Management 2008, 88(4):615-626.