The learning advantage: Bird species that learn their song show a tighter adjustment of song to noisy environments than those that do not learn

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 2171-2180

  Rios Chelen A A ^a,c   Salaberria, C ^b   Barbosa, I ^a   Macias Garcia C ^a   Gil, D ^b  

^a INSTITUTO DE ECOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

^b MUSEO NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS NATURALES   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bird song; Oscine; Song learning; Song plasticity; Suboscine; Urban noise

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; LEARNING; NOISE; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; SONGBIRD;

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIRD; BRAZIL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; LEARNING; MEXICO; NOISE; PHYSIOLOGY; SINGING; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BIRDS; BRAZIL; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; LEARNING; LINEAR MODELS; MEXICO; NOISE; SELECTION, GENETIC; SINGING; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

BRAZIL; FEDERAL DISTRICT [MEXICO]; MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; MEXICO CITY;

AVES; PASSERI; TYRANNI;

EID: 84868192310     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02597.x     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Amador, A., Goller, F. & Mindlin, G.B. 2008. Frequency modulation during song in a suboscine does not require vocal muscles. J. Neurophysiol. 99: 2383-2389.
2. Aoki, K. 1989. A sexual-selection model for the evolution of imitative learning of song in polygynous birds. Am. Nat. 134: 599-612.
3. Barber, J.R., Crooks, K.R. & Fristrup, K.M. 2010. The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25: 180-189.
4. Barker, F.K., Cibois, A., Schikler, P., Feinstein, J. & Cracraft, J. 2004. Phylogeny and diversification of the largest avian radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101: 11040-11045.
5. Bermúdez-Cuamatzin, E., Ríos-Chelén, A.A., Gil, D. & Macías Garcia, C. 2009. Strategies of song adaptation to urban noise in the house finch: syllable pitch plasticity or differential syllable use? Behaviour 146: 1269-1286.
6. Bermúdez-Cuamatzin, E., Ríos-Chelén, A.A., Gil, D. & Macías Garcia, C. 2011. Experimental evidence for real-time song frequency shift in response to urban noise in a passerine bird. Biol. Lett. 7: 36-38.
7. Björklund, M., Ruiz, I. & Senar, J.C. 2010. Genetic differentiation in the urban habitat: the great tits (Parus major) of the parks of Barcelona city. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 99: 9-19.
8. Brumm, H. 2004. The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird. J. Anim. Ecol. 73: 434-440.
9. Brumm, H. & Slabbekoorn, H. 2005. Acoustic communication in noise. Adv. Study Behav. 35: 151-209.
10. Brumm, H. & Slater, P.J.B. 2006. Ambient noise, motor fatigue, and serial redundancy in chaffinch song. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 60: 475-481.
11. Buskirk, J.V. 1997. Independent evolution of song structure and note structure in American wood warblers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 755-761.
12. Cardillo, M., Mace, G.M., Gittleman, J.L. & Purvis, A. 2006. Latent extinction risk and the future battlegrounds of mammal conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103: 4157-4161.
13. Cardoso, G.C. & Atwell, J.W. 2011. Directional cultural change by modification and replacement of memes. Evolution 65: 295-300.
14. Catchpole, C.K. 1982. The evolution of bird sounds in relation to mating and spacing behavior. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds (D.E. Kroodsma, E.H. Miller & H. Ouellet, eds), pp. 297-319. Academic Press, New York.
15. Catchpole, C.K. & Slater, P.J.B. 2008. Bird Song. Biological Themes and Variations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
16. Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. & Feldman, M.W. 1981. Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
17. Díaz, M., Parra, A. & Gallardo, C. 2011. Serins respond to anthropogenic noise by increasing vocal activity. Behav. Ecol. 22: 332-336.
18. Ericson, P.G.P., Irestedt, M. & Johansson, U.S. 2003. Evolution, biogeography, and patterns of diversification in passerine birds. J. Avian Biol. 34: 3-15.
19. Feduccia, A. 1999. The Origin and Evolution of Birds. Yale University Press, New Haven.
20. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125: 1-15.
21. Fernández-Juricic, E., Poston, R., De Collibus, K., Morgan, T., Bastain, B., Martin, C. et al. 2005. Microhabitat selection and singing behavior patterns of male house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) in urban parks in a heavily urbanized landscape in the Western US. Urban Habitats 3: 49-69.
22. Francis, C.D., Ortega, C.P. & Cruz, A. 2011a. Different behavioural responses to anthropogenic noise by two closely related passerine birds. Biol. Lett. 7: 850-852.
23. Francis, C.D., Ortega, C.P. & Cruz, A. 2011b. Vocal frequency change reflects different responses to anthropogenic noise in two suboscine tyrant flycatchers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 278: 2025-2031.
24. Francis, C.D., Ortega, C.P. & Cruz, A. 2011c. Noise pollution filters bird communities based on vocal frequency. PLoS One 6: e27052.
25. Fuller, R.A., Warren, P.H. & Gaston, K.J. 2007. Daytime noise predicts nocturnal singing in urban robins. Biol. Lett. 3: 368-370.
26. Gahr, M. 2000. Neural song control system of hummingbirds: comparison to swifts, vocal learning (songbirds) and nonlearning (suboscines) passerines, and vocal learning (budgerigars) and nonlearning (dove, owl, gull, quail, chicken) nonpasserines. J. Comp. Neurol. 426: 182-196.
27. Gaunt, A.S. 1983. An hypothesis concerning the relationship of ryringeal structure to vocal abilities. Auk 100: 853-862.
28. Gross, K., Pasinelli, G. & Kunc, H.P. 2010. Behavioral plasticity allows short-term adjustment to a novel environment. Am. Nat. 176: 456-464.
29. Halfwerk, W. & Slabbekoorn, H. 2009. A behavioural mechanism explaining noise-dependent frequency use in urban birdsong. Anim. Behav. 78: 1301-1307.
30. Hanna, D., Blouin-Demers, G., Wilson, D.R. & Mennill, D.J. 2011. Anthropogenic noise affects song structure in red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). J. Exp. Biol. 214: 3549-3556.
31. Hansen, P. 1979. Vocal learning: Its role in adapting sound structures to long-distance propagation, and a hypothesis on its evolution. Anim. Behav. 27: 1270-1271.
32. Hu, Y. & Cardoso, G.C. 2009. Are bird species that vocalize at higher frequencies preadapted to inhabit noisy urban areas? Behav. Ecol. 20: 1268-1273.
33. Kirschel, A.N.G., Blumstein, D.T., Cohen, R.E., Buermann, W., Smith, T.B. & Slabbekoorn, H. 2009. Birdsong tuned to the environment: green hylia song varies with elevation, tree cover, and noise. Behav. Ecol. 20: 1089-1095.
34. Krebs, J.R. & Davies, N.B. 1993. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology, 3rd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, London, UK.
35. Kroodsma, D.E. 1982. Learning and the ontogeny of sound signals in birds. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds. (D.E. Kroodsma, E.H. Miller & H. Ouellet, eds), pp. 1-23. Academic Press, New York.
36. Kroodsma, D.E. 2004. The diversity and plasticity of birdsong. In: Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong (P. Marler & H. Slabbekoorn, eds), pp. 108-131. Elsevier, San Diego.
37. Lachlan, R.F. & Slater, P.J.B. 1999. The maintenance of vocal learning by gene-culture interaction: the cultural trap hypothesis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 701-706.
38. Luther, D. & Baptista, L. 2010. Urban noise and the cultural evolution of bird songs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 277: 469-473.
39. McCracken, K.G. & Sheldon, F.H. 1997. Avian vocalizations and phylogenetic signal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 3833-3836.
40. Mockford, E.J., Marshall, R.C. & Dabelsteen, T. 2011. Degradation of rural and urban great tit song: testing transmission efficiency. PLoS One 6: e28242.
41. Morton, E.S. 1996. Why songbirds learn songs: an arms race over ranging? Poult. Avian Biol. Rev. 7: 65-71.
42. Moyle, R.G., Chesser, R.T., Prum, R.O., Schikler, P. & Cracraft, J. 2006. Phylogeny and evolutionary history of Old World suboscine birds (Aves: Eurylaimides). Am. Mus. Novit. 3544: 1-22.
43. Müller, J. 1878. On Certain Variations in the Vocal Organs of the Passeres That Have Hitherto Escaped Notice. Macmillan, London.
44. Mundiger, P.C. 1982. Microgeographic and macrogeographic variation in acquired vocalizations of birds. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds (D.E. Kroodsma, E.H. Miller & H. Ouellet, eds), pp 147-208. Academic Press, New York.
45. Nemeth, E. & Brumm, H. 2009. Blackbirds sing higher-pitched songs in cities: adaptation to habitat acoustics or side-effect of urbanization? Anim. Behav. 78: 637-641.
46. Nemeth, E. & Brumm, H. 2010. Birds and anthropogenic noise: are urban songs adaptive? Am. Nat. 176: 465-475.
47. Nottebohm, F. 1972. The origins of vocal learning. Am. Nat. 106: 116-140.
48. Nottebohm, F. 1991. Reassessing the mechanisms and origins of vocal learning in birds. Trends Neurosci. 14: 206-211.
49. Patricelli, G.L. & Blickley, J.L. 2006. Avian communication in urban noise: causes and consequences of vocal adjustment. Auk 123: 639-649.
50. Payne, R.B. 1982. Ecological consequences of song matching: breeding success and intraspecific song mimicry in Indigo Buntings. Ecology 63: 401-411.
51. Podos, J. & Warren, P.S. 2007. The evolution of geographic variation in birdsong Adv. Study. Behav. 37: 403-458.
52. Purvis, A. & Rambaut, A. 1995. Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data. Computer applications in the biosciences: CABIOS 11: 247-251.
53. Rabin, L.A. & Greene, C.M. 2002. Changes to acoustic communication systems in human-altered environments. J. Comp. Psychol. 116: 137-141.
54. Ríos Chelén, A.A., Macías Garcia, C. & Riebel, K. 2005. Variation in the song of a sub-oscine, the vermilion flycatcher. Behaviour 142: 1115-1132.
55. Ríos-Chelén, A.A. 2009. Bird song: the interplay between urban noise and sexual selection. Oecol. Bras. 13: 153-164.
56. Rosenthal, R. 1991. Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. Sage Publications, Inc., Newbury Park, California.
57. Seddon, N. 2005. Ecological adaptation and species recognition drives vocal evolution in neotropical suboscine birds. Evolution 59: 200-215.
58. Slabbekoorn, H. 2004. Singing in the wild: the ecology of birdsong. In: Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong (P. Marler & H. Slabbekoorn, eds), pp. 178-205. Elsevier, San Diego.
59. Slabbekoorn, H. & den Boer-Visser, A. 2006. Cities change the songs of birds. Curr. Biol. 16: 2326-2331.
60. Slabbekoorn, H. & Peet, M. 2003. Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature 424: 267.
61. Smith, W.J. 1988. Patterned daytime singing of the eastern wood-pewee, Contopus virens. Anim. Behav. 36: 1111-1123.
62. Smith, W.J. & Smith, A.M. 1992. Behavioral information provided by two song forms of the Eastern Kingbird, T. tyrannus. Behaviour 120: 90-102.
63. Stutchbury, B.J. & Morton, E.S. 2001. Behavioral Ecology of Tropical Birds. Academic Press, London, UK.
64. Swanson, D.L. & Bozinovic, F. 2011. Metabolic capacity and the evolution of biogeographic patterns in oscine and suboscine passerine birds. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 84: 185-194.
65. Thomas, G.H. 2008. The development of coordinated singing in cooperatively displaying long-tailed manakins. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 275: 2077-2083.
66. Tumer, E.C. & Brainard, M.S. 2007. Performance variability enables adaptive plasticity of 'crystallized' adult birdsong. Nature 450: 1240-1244.
67. Verzijden, M.N., Ripmeester, E.A.P., Ohms, V.R., Snelderwaard, P. & Slabbekoorn, H. 2010. Immediate spectral flexibility in singing chiffchaffs during experimental exposure to highway noise. J. Exp. Biol. 213: 2575-2581.
68. Warren, P.S., Katti, M., Ermann, M. & Brazel, A. 2006. Urban bioacoustics: it's not just noise. Anim. Behav. 71: 491-502.
69. Wood, W.E., Yezerinac, S.M. & Dufty, J.A.M. 2006. Song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) song varies with urban noise. Auk 123: 650-659.