An amperometric enzyme biosensor for real-time measurements of cellobiohydrolase activity on insoluble cellulose

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 109, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 3199-3204

  Cruys Bagger, Nicolaj ^a,b   Ren, Guilin ^a   Tatsumi, Hirosuke ^c   Baumann, Martin J ^b   Spodsberg, Nikolaj ^b   Andersen, Heidi Delcomyn ^a   Gorton, Lo ^d   Borch, Kim ^b   Westh, Peter ^a  

^a ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b NOVOZYMES A S   (Denmark)

^c SHINSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cellobiose dehydrogenase; Cellulase kinetics; Cellulose hydrolysis; Enzyme biosensor

Indexed keywords

A-CARBON; AG/AGCL; AMPEROMETRIC; AMPEROMETRY; BENZOQUINONES; CELLO-OLIGOSACCHARIDES; CELLOBIOHYDROLASE I; CELLOBIOHYDROLASES; CELLOBIOSE; CELLOBIOSE DEHYDROGENASE; CELLULOSE HYDROLYSIS; CELLULOSE SUBSTRATES; CONTINUOUS DETECTIONS; ENZYME ASSAYS; ENZYME BIOSENSORS; FAST RESPONSE TIME; HIGH SENSITIVITY; INITIAL KINETICS; LOW DETECTION LIMIT; MOLECULAR MECHANISM; OXIDATION CURRENTS; PHANEROCHAETE CHRYSOSPORIUM; REAL TIME MEASUREMENTS; REAL-TIME DATA; SEMICRYSTALLINES; TRANSIENT KINETICS; TRICHODERMA REESEI;

BIOASSAY; CELLULOSE; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; KETONES; KINETICS; PHENOLS;

ENZYME ELECTRODES;

BIOETHANOL; BIOFUEL; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE 1,4 BETA CELLOBIOSIDASE; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMPEROMETRY; ARTICLE; BIOMASS; BIOSENSOR; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME KINETICS; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; HYDROLYSIS; MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; PHANEROCHAETE; RENEWABLE ENERGY; TRICHODERMA;

BIOSENSING TECHNIQUES; CARBOHYDRATE DEHYDROGENASES; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE 1,4-BETA-CELLOBIOSIDASE; CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; ELECTRODES; ENZYMES, IMMOBILIZED; FUNGAL PROTEINS; HYDROLYSIS; KINETICS; LIMIT OF DETECTION; PHANEROCHAETE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TRICHODERMA;

HYPOCREA JECORINA; PHANEROCHAETE CHRYSOSPORIUM;

EID: 84868122545     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.24593     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Baker DA, Gough DA. 1996. Dynamic delay and maximal dynamic error in continuous biosensors. Anal Chem 68(8):1292-1297.
2. Claeyssens M, Tomme P, Brewer CF, Hehre EJ. 1990. Stereochemical course of hydrolysis and hydration reactions catalyzed by cellobiohydrolase-I and cellobiosehydrolase-II from Trichoderma reesei. FEBS Lett 263(1):89-92.
3. Higham CW, Gordonsmith D, Dempsey CE, Wood PM. 1994. Direct H1-NMR evidence for conversion of beta-D-cellobiose to cellolactone by cellobiose dehydrogenase from Phanerochaete chrysosprium. FEBS Lett 351(1):128-132.
4. Hildén L, Eng L, Johansson G, Lindqvist S, Pettersson G. 2001. An amperometric cellobiose dehydrogenase-based biosensor can be used for measurement of cellulase activity. Anal Biochem 290:245-250.
5. Hu G, Heitmann JA, Rojas OJ. 2009. Quantification of cellulase activity using the quartz crystal microbalance technique. Anal Chem 81(5):1872-1880.
6. Igarashi K, Wada M, Hori R, Samejima M. 2006. Surface density of cellobiohydrolase on crystalline celluloses - A critical parameter to evaluate enzymatic kinetics at a solid-liquid interface. FEBS J 273(13):2869-2878.
7. Johnson KA. 1992. Transient-state kinetic analysis of enzymes reaction pathways. In: Sigman DS, editor. The enzymes: Mechanisms of catalysis, 3rd edition. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
8. Kabayama MA, Patterson D. 1958. The thermodynamics of mutarotation of some sugars 1. measurement of the heat of mutarotation by microcalorimetry. Canadian J Chem 36(3):557-562.
9. Lindgren A, Stoica L, Ruzgas T, Ciucu A, Gorton L. 1999. Development of a cellobiose dehydrogenase modified electrode for amperometric detection of diphenols. Analyst 124(4):527-532.
10. Ludwig R, Harreither W, Tasca F, Gorton L. 2010. Cellobiose dehydrogenase: A versatile catalyst for electrochemical applications. Chemphyschem 11(13):2674-2697.
11. Murphy L, Baumann MJ, Borch K, Sweeney M, Westh P. 2010. An enzymatic signal amplification system for calorimetric studies of cellobiohydrolases. Anal Biochem 404(2):140-148.
12. Murphy L, Cruys-Bagger N, Damgaard HD, Baumann MJ, Olsen SN, Borch K, Lassen SF, Sweeney M, Tatsumi H, Westh P. 2012. Origin of initial burst in activity for trichoderma reesei endo-glucanases hydrolyzing insoluble cellulose. J Biol Chem 287(2):1252-1260.
13. Nordling M, Elmgren M, Stahlberg J, Pettersson G, Lindquist SE. 1993. A combined cellobiose oxidase glucose-oxidase biosensor for HPLC determination online of glucose and souble cellodextrines. Anal Biochem 214(2):389-396.
14. Praestgaard E, Elmerdahl J, Murphy L, Nymand S, McFarland KC, Borch K, Westh P. 2011. A kinetic model for the burst phase of processive cellulases. FEBS J 278(9):1547-1560.
15. Samejima M, Sugiyama J, Igarashi K, Eriksson KEL. 1998. Enzymatic hydrolysis of bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Res 305(2):281-288.
16. Stoica L, Ruzgas T, Ludwig R, Haltrich D, Gorton L. 2006. Direct electron transfer - A favorite electron route for cellobiose dehydrogenase (CDH) from Trametes villosa. Comparison with CDH from Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Langmuir 22(25):10801-10806.
17. Tatsumi H, Katano H, Ikeda T. 2006. Kinetic analysis of enzymatic hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose by cellobiohydrolase using an amperometric biosensor. Anal Biochem 357(2):257-261.
18. Valjamae P, Sild V, Pettersson G, Johansson G. 1998. The initial kinetics of hydrolysis by cellobiohydrolases I and II is consistent with a cellulose surface - erosion model. Eur J Biochem 253(2):469-475.
19. Zhang YHP, Himmel ME, Mielenz JR. 2006. Outlook for cellulase improvement: Screening and selection strategies. Biotechnol Adv 24(5):452.
20. Zhang YHP, Lynd LR. 2004. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 88(7):797-824.