Support for removal of point-of-purchase tobacco advertising and displays: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Canada survey

Tobacco Control

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 555-559

  Brown, Abraham ^a,b   Boudreau, Christian ^c   Moodie, Crawford ^a   Fong, Geoffrey T ^c,d   Li, Grace Y ^c   McNeill, Ann ^b   Thompson, Mary E ^c   Hassan, Louise M ^e   Hyland, Andrew ^f   Thrasher, James F ^g,h   Yong, Hua Hie ⁱ   Borland, Ron ⁱ   Hastings, Gerard ^a   Hammond, David ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^d ONTARIO INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH   (Canada)

^e LANCASTER UNIVERSITY MANAGEMENT SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^f ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^h INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE SALUD PÚBLICA   (Mexico)

ⁱ CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY CENTRE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERTIZING; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CANADA; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEGAL ASPECT; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MARKETING; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SMOKING; TIME; TOBACCO; TOBACCO INDUSTRY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CANADA; COMMERCE; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MARKETING; MIDDLE AGED; SMOKING; TIME FACTORS; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84868119201     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050153     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Wakefield M, Germain D, Durkin S, et al. An experimental study of effects on schoolchildren of exposure to point-of-sale cigarette advertising and pack displays. Health Educ Res 2006;21:338e47.
2. WHO. Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2008: The MPOWER Package. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008.
3. WHO. Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, 2005. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2005.
4. Davis R, Gilpin E, Loken B, et al. Influence of tobacco marketing on smoking behavior. In: Davis R, Gilpin E, Loken B, et al, eds. The Role of the Media in Promoting and Reducing Tobacco Use. Tobacco Control Monograph No.19. Bethesda, Maryland, USA: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 2008:211e91.
5. Carter OB, Mills BW, Donovan RJ. The effect of retail cigarette pack displays on unplanned purchases: Results from immediate postpurchase interviews. Tob Control 2009;18:218e21.
6. Lovato C, Hsu HC, Sabiston CM, et al. Tobacco point-of-purchase marketing in school neighbourhoods and school smoking prevalence: A descriptive study. Can J Pub Health 2007;98:265e70.
7. Brown A, Moodie C. Tobacco marketing influences on smoking intentions via normative beliefs. Health Educ Res 2009;24:721e33.
8. Wakefield M, Germain D, Henriksen L. The effect of retail cigarette pack displays on impulse purchase. Addiction 2008;103:322e8.
9. Carter BL, Robinson JD, Lam CY, et al. A psychometric evaluation of cigarette stimuli used in a cue reactivity study. Nicotine Tob Res 2006;8:361e9.
10. Donovan RJ, Jancey J, Jones S. Tobacco point of sale advertising increases positive brand user imagery. Tob Control 2002;11:191e4.
11. Lovato C, Linn G, Stead L, et al. Impact of tobacco advertising and promotion on increasing adolescent smoking behaviors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(4): CD003439.
12. Paynter J, Edwards R. The impact of tobacco promotion at the point of sale: a systematic review. Nicotine Tob Res 2009;11:322e8.
13. Thomson G, Hoek J, Edwards R, et al. Evidence and arguments on tobacco retail displays: marketing an addictive drug to children? N Z Med J 2008;121:87e98.
14. McNeill A, Lewis S, Quinn C, et al. Evaluation of the removal of point of sale tobacco displays in Ireland. Tob Control 2010;20:137e43.
15. Paynter J, Edwards R, Schluter PJ, et al. Point of sale tobacco displays and smoking amongst 14-15 year olds in New Zealand: cross sectional study. Tob Control 2009;18:268e74.
16. Health Canada. The Tobacco Act 1997, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 2010. http:// www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/tobac-tabac/res/news-nouvelles/act-loi-eng.php
17. Quinn C, Lewis S, Edwards R, et al. Economic evaluation of the removal of tobacco promotion in Ireland. Tob Control 2010;20:151e5.
18. Hickling JA, Miller CL. Cigarette pack and advertising displays at point of purchase: community demand for restrictions. Int J Consum Stud 2008;32:574e8.
19. Fong GT, Cummings KM, Borland R, et al. The conceptual framework of the international tobacco control (ITC) policy evaluation project. Tob Control 2006;15 (Suppl 3):iii3e11.
20. Binson D, Canchola JA, Catania JA. Random selection in a national telephone survey: a comparison of the Kish, next-birthday, and last-birthday methods. J Offic Stat 2000;16:53e60.
21. Thompson ME, Fong GT, Hammond D, et al. Methods of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control 2006;15(suppl III):iii12-18.
22. de Vries H, Mudde AN. Predicting stage transitions for smoking cessation applying the attitude social influence efficacy model. Psych Health 1998;13:369e85.
23. Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Evers K. The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1997:60e84.
24. Borland R, Yong HH, O'Connor RJ, et al. The reliability and predictive validity of the heaviness of smoking index and its two components: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country study. Nicotine Tob Res 2010;12(Suppl 1):S45-50.
25. Hardin JW, Hilbe JM. Generalized Estimating Equations. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2003.
26. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data using generalized linear models. Biomet J 1986;73:13e22.
27. Hedeker DR, Gibbons RD. Longitudinal Data Analysis. New York: Wiley, 2006.
28. Marques-Vidal P, Melich-Cerveira J, Paccaud F, et al. Opinions on tobacco control policies in Lausanne, Switzerland, 2003e2006. Prev Med 2010;51:193e4.
29. California Adult Tobacco Survey (CATS). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health, 2007.
30. Fong GT, Hammond D, Hitchman SC. The impact of pictures on the effectiveness of tobacco warnings. Bull World Health Organ 2009;87:640e3.
31. Hyland A, Hassan LM, Higbee C, et al. The impact of smokefree legislation in Scotland: results from the Scottish ITC Scotland/UK longitudinal surveys. Eur J Pub Health 2009;19:198e205.
32. Harris F, MacKintosh AM, Anderson S, et al. Effects of the 2003 advertising/ promotion ban in the United Kingdom on awareness of tobacco marketing: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control 2006;15(Suppl 3):iii26-33.
33. Ferrence R. Diffusion theory and drug use. Addiction 2001;96:165e73.
34. Borland R, Yong HH, Cummings KM, et al. Determinants and consequences of smoke-free homes: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control 2006;15(Suppl III):iii42-50.
35. Brown A, Moodie C, Hastings G. A longitudinal study of policy effect (smoke-free legislation) on smoking norms: ITC Scotland/United Kingdom. Nicotine Tob Res 2009;11:924e32.
36. Eriksen MP, Cerak RL. The diffusion and impact of clean indoor air laws. Annu Rev Public Health 2008;29:171e85.
37. Germain D, McCarthy M, Wakefield M. Smoker sensitivity to retail tobacco displays and quitting: a cohort study. Addiction 2009;105:159e63.
38. Hoek J, Gifford H, Pirikahu G, et al. How do tobacco retail displays affect cessation attempts? Findings from a qualitative study. Tob Control 2010;19:334e7.