Ophthalmological factors influencing visual asthenopia as a result of viewing 3D displays

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 96, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1391-1394

  Wee, Sung Wook ^a   Moon, Nam Ju ^a   Lee, Won Ki ^b   Jeon, Sohee ^b  

^a Chung Ang University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASTHENOPIA; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL FEATURE; EYE DISCOMFORT; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; LACRIMATION; MALE; NEAR POINT OF ACCUMULATION; NEAR POINT OF CONVERGENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADULT; ASTHENOPIA; COMPUTER TERMINALS; CONVERGENCE, OCULAR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; REFERENCE VALUES; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 84868103517     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: 14682079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301690     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Blehm C, Vishnu S, Khattak A, et al. Computer vision syndrome. Surv Ophthalmol 2005;50:253-62.
2. Lambooij M, IJsselsteijn W, Fortuin M, et al. Visual discomfort and visual fatigue of stereoscopic displays: a review. J Imaging Sci Technol 2009;53:1-14.
3. Hoffman DM, Girshick AR, Akeley K, et al. Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. J Vis 2008;8:1-30.
4. Suzuki Y, Onda Y, Katada S, et al. Effects of an eyeglass-free 3-D display on the human visual system. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2004;48:1-6.
5. Fujikado T. Asthenopia from the viewpoint of visual information processing - effect of watching 3D images (in Japanese). J Eye 1997;14:1295-319.
6. Iwasaki T, Tawara A. Effects of viewing distance on accommodative and pupillary responses following a three-dimensional task. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002;22:113-18.
7. Matsuda T, Suzuki Y. Three-dimensional virtual images modify the waveform of pupillary near response. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2008;52:79-83.
8. Sharma P, Saxena R, Narvekar M, et al. Evaluation of distance and near stereoacuity and fusional vergence in intermittent exotropia. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008;56:121-5.
9. Krachmer H, Mannis J, Holland J. Cornea. 3rd edn. Mosby, 2011:431.
10. Sheedy JE, Hayes JN, Engle J. Is all asthenopia the same? Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:732-9.
11. Stathacopoulos RA, Rosenbaum AL, Zanoni D, et al. Distance stereoacuity: assessing control in intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology 1993;100:495-500.
12. Beneish R, Flanders M. The role of stereopsis and early postoperative alignment in long-term surgical results of intermittent exotropia. Can J Ophthalmol 1994;29:119-24.
13. Toda I, Fujishima H, Tsubota K. Ocular fatigue is the major symptom of dry eye. Acta Ophthalmol 1993;71:347-52.
14. Seo YW, Kim KH, Kang SY, et al. The objective methods to evaluate ocular fatigue associated with computer work. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2010;51:1327-32.
15. Galassi F, Giambene B, Corvi A, et al. Evaluation of ocular surface temperature and retrobulbar haemodynamics by infrared thermography and colour Doppler imaging in patients with glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:878-81.
16. Sodi A, Giambene B, Falaschi G, et al. Ocular surface temperature in central retinal vein occlusion: preliminary data. Eur J Ophthalmol 2007;17:755-9.
17. Maeda F, Tabuchi K, Kani K, et al. Influence of three-dimensional image viewing on visual function. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2011;55:175-82.