Three-dimensional failure criteria for fiber-reinforced laminates

Composite Structures

Volumn 95, Issue , 2013, Pages 63-79

  Catalanotti, G ^a   Camanho, P P ^a   Marques, A T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

A. Polymer matrix composites (PMCs); B. Failure criteria; C. Strength

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL PREDICTIONS; C. STRENGTH; FAILURE CRITERIA; FIBER-REINFORCED LAMINATES; MATERIAL STRENGTH; MULTIAXIAL STRESS STATE; POLYMER COMPOSITE; POLYMERMATRIX COMPOSITES (PMCS); THREE DIMENSIONAL STRESS STATE; TRANSVERSE FAILURE; UNIDIRECTIONAL FIBERS;

FORECASTING; POLYMER MATRIX COMPOSITES; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 84868098268     PISSN: 02638223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.016     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Tsai S.W., Wu E.M. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. J Compos Mater 1971, 5:58-80.
2. Christensen R.M. Stress based yield/failure criteria for fiber composites. Int J Solids Struct 1997, 34:529-543.
3. Hinton M.J., Soden P.D. Failure criteria for composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol 1998, 58:1001-1010.
4. Soden P.D., Hinton M.J., Kaddour A.S. Lamina properties and lay-up configurations and loading conditions of a range fibre reinforced composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol 1998, 58:1011-1022.
5. Puck A., Schürmann H. Failure analysis of frp laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models. Compos Sci Technol 1998, 58:1045-1067.
6. Sun C.T., Tao J.X. Prediction of failure envelopes and stress strain behaviours of composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol 1998, 58:1125-1136.
7. Liu K.S., Tsai S.W. A progressive quadratic failure criterion of a laminate. Compos Sci Technol 1998, 58:1023-1032.
8. Kuraishi A., Tsai S.W., Liu K.K.S. A progressive quadratic failure criterion - part B. Compos Sci Technol 2002, 62:1683-1695.
9. Puck A., Schürmann H. Failure analysis of frp laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models. Compos Sci Technol 2002, 62:1633-1662.
10. Hinton M.J., Kaddour A.S., Soden P.D. A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates, judged against experimental evidence. Compos Sci Technol 2002, 62:1725-1797.
11. Sun C.T., Tao J., Kaddour A.S. Prediction of failure envelopes and stress-strain behavior of composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol 2002, 62:1672-1682.
12. Dávila C.G., Camanho P.P., Rose C.A. Failure criteria for frp laminates. J Compos Mater 2005, 39(4):323-345.
13. Kaddour A, Hinton M. Triaxial failure criteria for polymer composites: part (A) of WWFE-II: comparison between theories. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on composite materials, ICCM18, Jeju Island, Korea, August 21-26; 2011.
14. Maimí P., Camanho P.P., Mayugo J.A., Dávila C.G. A continuum damage model for composite laminates: part I - constitutive model. Mech Mater 2007, 39:897-908.
15. Maimí P., Camanho P.P., Mayugo J.A., Dávila C.G. A continuum damage model for composite laminates: part II - computational implementation and validation. Mech Mater 2006, 39:909-919.
16. Puck A. Calculating the strength of glass fibre/plastic laminates under combined load. Kunstst German Plast 1969, 55:18-19. Original in German.
17. Puck A., Schneider W. On failure mechanism and failure criteria of filamentwound glass-fibre/resin composites. Plast Polym 1969, 33-44. Original in German.
18. Pinho S.T., Iannucci L., Robinson P. Physically-based failure models and criteria for laminated fibre-reinforced composites with emphasis on fibre kinking: part I: development. Composites: Part A 2006, 37:63-73.
19. Knops M. Analysis of failure in fiber polymer laminates. The theory of Alfred Puck 2008, Springer. first ed.
20. Rosen V.W. Mechanics of composite strengthening 1965, Fiber Composite Materials American Society of Metals, Metals Park, OH, p. 37-75.
21. Argon A.S. Fracture of composites in: treatise on material science and technology 1972, Academic Press, New york.
22. Schultheisz C.R., Waas A.M. Compressive failure of composites: part I: testing and micromechanical theories. Prog Aerosp Sci 1996, 32:1-42.
23. Pae K.D. Influence of hydrostatic pressure on the mechanical behavior and properties of unidirectional, laminated, graphite-fibre/epoxy-matrix thick composites. Composites: Part B 1996, 27B:599-611.
24. Koerber H., Camanho P.P. High strain rate characterisation of unidirectional carbon-epoxy im7-8552 in transverse compression and in-plane shear using digital image correlation. Mech Mater 2010, 42:1004-1019.
25. Hine P.J. The effect of hydrostatic pressure on the mechanical properties of glass fiber/epoxy unidirectional composites. Composites: Part A 2005, 36:279-289.
26. Daniel I.M., Luo J.J., Schubel P.M., Werner B.T. Interfiber/interlaminar failure of composites under multi-axial states of stress. Compos Sci Technol 2009, 69:764?-771.
27. Swanson S.R., Messick M.J., Tian Z. Failure of carbon/epoxy lamina under combined stress. J Compos Mater 1987, 21:619-630.
28. Swanson S.R., Qian Y. Multiaxial characterization of T800/3900-2 carbon/epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 1992, 43:197-203.
29. Hashin Z. Failure criteria for unidirectional fibre composites. J Appl Mech 1980, 47:329-334.
30. Camanho P.P., Dávila C.G., Pinho S.T., Iannucci L., Robinson P. Prediction of in-situ strengths and matrix cracking in composites under transverse tension and in-plane shear. Composites: Part A 2006, 37:165-176.
31. Gutkin R, Pinho ST. Practical application of failure models to predict the response of composite structures. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on composite materials, ICCM18, Jeju Island, Korea, August 21-26; 2011.