Comparison of breast tissue measurements using magnetic resonance imaging, digital mammography and a mathematical algorithm

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 57, Issue 21, 2012, Pages 6903-6927

  Lu, Lee Jane W ^a   Nishino, Thomas K ^b   Johnson, Raleigh F ^b   Nayeem, Fatima ^a   Brunder, Donald G ^a   Ju, Hyunsu ^a   Leonard, Morton H ^b   Grady, James J ^a   Khamapirad, Tuenchit ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH   (United States)

^b University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; BREAST TISSUES; COEFFICIENTS OF VARIATIONS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FIBROGLANDULAR TISSUE; GRADIENT ECHO; HISTOGRAM SEGMENTATION; INVERSION RECOVERY; MAMMOGRAPHIC IMAGING; MATHEMATICAL ALGORITHMS; REGRESSION SLOPE; VOLUMETRIC RECONSTRUCTION;

ALGORITHMS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

TISSUE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAST; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84868031237     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/6903     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. ACR 2003 (Reston, VA: American College of Radiology) www.ACR.org
2. ACS 2011 Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2011-2012 (Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society) http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/ @epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-030975.pdf
3. Berg W, Gutierrez L, Nessaiver M, Carter W, Bhargavan M, Lewis R and Ioffe O 2004 Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer Radiology 233 830-49
4. Boston R, Schnall M, Englander S, Landis J and Moate P 2005 Estimation of the content of fat and parenchyma in breast tissue using MRI T1 histograms and phantoms Magn. Reson. Imaging 23 591-9 (Pubitemid 40779246)
5. Boyd N, Byng J, Jong R, Fishell E, Little L, Miller A, Lockwood G, Tritchler D and Yaffe M 1995 Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian national breast screening study J. Natl Cancer Inst. 87 670-5
6. Boyd N et al 2007 Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer N. Engl. J. Med. 356 227-36 (Pubitemid 46143226)
7. Boyd N, Rommens J, Vogt K, Lee V, Hopper J, Yaffe M and Paterson A 2005 Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer Lancet Oncol. 6 798-808
8. Byng J W, Boyd N F, Fishell E, Jong RA and Yaffe M J 1996 Automated analysis of mammographic densities Phys. Med. Biol. 41 909-23 (Pubitemid 26156945)
9. Byrne C, Schairer C, Brinton L, Wolfe J, Parekh N, Salane M, Carter C and Hoover R 2001 Effects of mammographic density and benign breast disease on breast cancer risk (United States) Cancer Causes Control 12 103-10 (Pubitemid 32165267)
10. Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, Parekh N, Salane M, Brinton L, Hoover R and Haile R 1995 Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status J. Natl Cancer Inst. 87 1622-9
11. Eng-Wong J, Orzano-Birgani J, Chow C K, Venzon D, Yao J, Galbo C E, Zujewski J A and Prindiville S 2008 Effect of raloxifene on mammographic density and breast magnetic resonance imaging in premenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 17 1696-701
12. Ertas G, Reed S and Leach M O 2009 Comparison of breast density assessments based on interactive thresholding and automated fast fuzzy c-means clustering in three-dimensional MR imaging Image Processing, Biosignal Processing, Modeling: World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering (Munich, Germany, 7-12 Sept.) (Berlin: Springer) pp 1893-6
13. Graham S J, Bronskill M J, Byng J W, Yaffe M J and Boyd N F 1996 Quantitative correlation of breast tissue parameters using magnetic resonance and x-ray mammography Br. J. Cancer 73 162-8 (Pubitemid 26028329)
14. Gram I, Bremnes Y, Ursin G, Maskarinec G, Bjurstam N and Lund E 2005 Percentage density, Wolfe's and Tabár's mammographic patterns: agreement and association with risk factors for breast cancer Breast Cancer Res. 7 R854-61
15. Holden A, Anderson J, Ives F, Taylor D, Wylie E and Adamson R 1996 Breast MRI: early experience with a 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo sequence in the evaluation of breast lesions Australas. Radiol. 40 391-7 (Pubitemid 27062550)
16. Khazen M et al 2008 A pilot study of compositional analysis of the breast and estimation of breast mammographic density using three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 17 2268-74
17. Klifa C, Carballido-Gamio J, Wilmes L, Laprie A, Lobo C, Demicco E, Watkins M, Shepherd J, Gibbs J and Hylton N 2004 Quantification of breast tissue index from MR data using fuzzy clustering IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 3 1667-70 (Pubitemid 40035720)
18. Klifa C, Carballido-Gamio J, Wilmes L, Laprie A, Shepherd J, Gibbs J, Fan B, Noworolski S and Hylton N 2010 Magnetic resonance imaging for secondary assessment of breast density in a high-risk cohort Magn. Reson. Imaging 28 8-15
19. Kopans D 2008 Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk Radiology 246 348-53
20. Kriege M et al 2004 Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition N. Engl. J. Med. 351 427-37 (Pubitemid 38988592)
21. Kuhl C 2007 Current status of breast MR imaging: part 2. Clinical applications Radiology 244 672-91 (Pubitemid 47292079)
22. Laidlaw D H, Fleischer K W and Barr A H 1998 Partial-volume Bayesian classification of material mixtures in MR volume data using voxel histograms IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17 74-86 (Pubitemid 128742011)
23. Laude D et al 2004 Comparison of various techniques used to estimate spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (the EuroBaVar study) Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 286 R226-31
24. Lee N, Rusinek H, Weinreb J, Chandra R, Toth H, Singer C and Newstead G 1997 Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of x-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 168 501-6 (Pubitemid 27051997)
25. Lehman C et al 2005 Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging Cancer 103 1898-905 (Pubitemid 40563263)
26. Lu L, Nishino T, Khamapirad T, Grady J, Leonard M J and Brunder D 2007 Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit Phys. Med. Biol. 52 4905-21 (Pubitemid 47232295)
27. Mccormack V and Dos Santos Silva I 2006 Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 15 1159-69
28. Merchant T, Thelissen G, De Graaf P, Nieuwenhuizen C, Kievit H and Den Otter W 1993 Application of a mixed imaging sequence for MR imaging characterization of human breast disease Acta Radiol. 34 356-61 (Pubitemid 23216439)
29. Merchant T, Thelissen G, Kievit H, Oosterwaal L, Bakker C and De Graaf P 1992 Breast disease evaluation with fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging Magn. Reson. Imaging 10 335-40
30. Nie K, Chang D, Chen J H, Shih T C, Hsu C C, Nalcioglu O and Su M Y 2010a Impact of skin removal on quantitative measurement of breast density using MRI Med. Phys. 37 227-33
31. Nie K, Chen J H, Chan S, Chau M K, Yu H J, Bahri S, Tseng T, Nalcioglu O and Su M Y 2008 Development of a quantitative method for analysis of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI Med. Phys. 35 5253-62
32. Nie K, Su M Y, Chau M K, Chan S, Nguyen H, Tseng T, Huang Y, Mclaren C E, Nalcioglu O and Chen J H 2010b Age- and race-dependence of the fibroglandular breast density analyzed on 3D MRI Med. Phys. 37 2770-6
33. Niitsu M, Tohno E and Itai Y 2003 Fat suppression strategies in enhanced MR imaging of the breast: comparison of SPIR and water excitation sequences J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 18 310-4 (Pubitemid 37046511)
34. Orel S and Schnall M 2001 MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer Radiology 220 13-30 (Pubitemid 32577955)
35. Poon C S, Bronskill M J, Henkelman R M and Boyd N F 1992 Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parameters and their relationship to mammographic pattern J. Natl Cancer Inst. 84 777-81
36. Ruan S, Jaggi C, Xue J, Fadili J and Bloyet D 2000 Brain tissue classification of magnetic resonance images using partial volume modeling IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 19 1179-87 (Pubitemid 32870335)
37. Santago P and Gage H D 1995 Statistical models of partial volume effect IEEE Trans. Image Process. 4 1531-40
38. Saslow D et al 2007 American cancer society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography CA Cancer J. Clin. 57 75-89 (Pubitemid 46535708)
39. Sivaramakrishna R, Obuchowski N, Chilcote W and Powell K 2001 Automatic segmentation of mammographic density Acad. Radiol. 8 250-6 (Pubitemid 32666465)
40. Thompson D J et al 2009 Assessing the usefulness of a novel MRI-based breast density estimation algorithm in a cohort of women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: the UK MARIBS study Breast Cancer Res. 11 R80
41. Warner E et al 2004 Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination JAMA 292 1317-25 (Pubitemid 39223222)
42. Wei J, Chan H, Helvie M, Roubidoux M, Sahiner B, Hadjiiski L, Zhou C, Paquerault S, Chenevert T and Goodsitt M 2004 Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images Med. Phys. 31 933-42 (Pubitemid 38508875)
43. Wolfe J 1976a Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 126 1130-7
44. Wolfe J 1976b Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern Cancer 37 2486-92
45. Wright H, Listinsky J, Rim A, Chellman-Jeffers M, Patrick R, Rybicki L, Kim J and Crowe J 2005 Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer in premenopausal women Am. J. Surg. 190 572-5 (Pubitemid 41306078)
46. Yu H, Reeder S B, Mckenzie C A, Brau A C, Shimakawa A, Brittain J H and Pelc N J 2006 Single acquisition water-fat separation: feasibility study for dynamic imaging Magn. Reson. Med. 55 413-22 (Pubitemid 43238111)