Difference in Hip Prosthesis Femoral Offset Affects Hip Abductor Strength and Gait Characteristics During Obstacle Crossing

Orthopedic Clinics of North America

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Chamnongkich, S ^a   Asayama, I ^b   Kinsey, T L ^d,e   Mahoney, O M ^c,f   Simpson, K J ^c  

^a CHIANG MAI UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b Keijin kai Kawasaki Hospital   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^d Clinical Research   (United States)

^e University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^f Athens Orthopedic Clinic PA   (United States)

Author keywords

Abductor strength; Femoral offset; Obstacle clearance; Total hip replacement

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTION; AGED; BODY MASS; BODY POSITION; BONE STRUCTURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; GAIT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; JOINT MOBILITY; MALE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE STRENGTH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PELVIS; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMUR; GAIT; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MUSCLE STRENGTH; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 84868020290     PISSN: 00305898     EISSN: 15581373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2012.07.008     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Brown M., Hislop H.J., Waters R.L., et al. Walking efficiency before and after total hip replacement. Phys Ther 1980, 60:1259-1263.
2. Vissers M.M., Bussmann J.B., Verhaar J.A.N., et al. Recovery of physical functioning after total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Phys Ther 2011, 91(2):615-629.
3. Loizeau J., Allard P., Duhaime M., et al. Bilateral gait patterns in subjects fitted with a total hip prosthesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995, 76:552-557.
4. Tanaka Y. Gait analysis of patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and those with total hip arthroplasty. Biomed Mater Eng 1998, 8:187-196.
5. Tanaka Y. Factors influencing the improvement of gait ability after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010, 25(6):982-985.
6. Kyriazis V., Rigas C. Temporal gait analysis of hip osteoarthritic patients operated with cementless hip replacement. Clin Biomech 2002, 17:318-321.
7. Girard J., Vendittoli P.A., Roy A.G., et al. Mémoire: Analyse de l'influence de l'offset fémoral sur la fonction clinique lors d'une étude prospective randomisée comparant les arthroplasties totales de hanche aux resurfaçages. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2008, 94(4):376-381. [in French].
8. Beaulieu M.L., Lamontagne M., Beaulé P.E. Lower limb biomechanics during gait do not return to normal following total hip arthroplasty. Gait Posture 2010, 32(2):269-273.
9. Sims K.J., Richardson C.A., Brauer S.G. Investigation of hip abductor activation in subjects with clinical unilateral hip osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2002, 61:687-692.
10. MacKinnon C.D., Winter D.A. Control of whole body balance in the frontal plane during human walking. J Biomech 1993, 26:633-644.
11. Asayama I., Naito M., Fujisawa M., et al. Relationship between radiographic measurements of reconstructed hip joint position and the Trendelenburg sign. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17:747-751.
12. Asayama I., Chamnonkich S., Simpson K. Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20(4):414-420.
13. Yamaguchi T., Naito M., Asayama, et al. Total hip arthroplasty: the relationship between posterolateral reconstruction, abductor muscle strength, and femoral offset. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2004, 12(2):164-167.
14. Lecerf G., Fessy M.H., Philippot R. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009, 95(3):210-219.
15. Steinberg B., Harris W.H. The offset problem in total hip arthroplasty. Contemp Orthop 1992, 24:556-562.
16. Sariali E., Lazennec J.Y., Khiami F., et al. Mathematical evaluation of jumping distance in total hip arthroplasty: influence of abduction angle, femoral head offset, and head diameter. Acta Orthop 2009, 80(3):277-282.
17. Incavo S.J., Havener T., McGrory B.J., et al. Efforts to improve cementless femoral stems in THR: 2- to 5-year follow-up of a high-offset femoral stem with distal stem modification (Secur-Fit-Plus). J Arthroplasty 2004, 19(1):61-67.
18. Kurtz W.B., Ecker T.M., Reichmann W.M., et al. Factors affecting bony impingement in hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 25(4):624-634.
19. Matsushita A., Nakashima Y., Jingushi S., et al. Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(4):646-651.
20. McGrory B.J., Morrey B.F., Cahalan T.D., et al. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995, 77B:865-869.
21. Wang X.Z., Xia L.W. Zhongguo Gu Shang 2008, 21(3):184-186. [in Chinese].
22. Wu P., Fu M., Mao Y., et al. Effect of femoral offset reconstruction on pelvic stability during gait after total hip arthroplasty. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. Chinese J Reparative Reconstructive Surg 2011, 25(5):513-516. [in Chinese].
23. Hermens H.J., Freriks B., Disselhorst-Klug C., et al. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2000, 10:361-374.
24. Kadaba M.P., Ramakrishnan H.K., Wootten M.E. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthop Res 1990, 8:383-392.
25. Johanson N.A., Charlson M.E., Szatrowski T.P., et al. A self-administered hip-rating questionnaire for the assessment of outcome after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992, 74:587-597.
26. Austin G.P., Garrett G.E., Bohannon R.W. Kinematic analysis of obstacle clearance during locomotion. Gait Posture 1999, 10:109-120.
27. Abdel-Aziz YI, Karara HM. Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates into object space coordinates in close-range photogrammetry. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Close-Range Photogrammetry. Falls Church: 1971. p. 1-18.
28. Hatze H. High-precision three-dimensional photogrammetric calibration and object space reconstruction using a modified DLT-approach. J Biomech 1998, 21:533-538.
29. Shapiro R. Direct linear transformation method for three-dimensional cinematography. Res Q 1978, 49(2):197-205.
30. Davis R.B., Ounpuu S., Tyburski D. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci 1991, 10:575-587.
31. Grood E.S., Suntay W.J. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 1983, 105:136-144.
32. Winter D.A. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement 2009, Wiley, Hoboken (NJ), p. 84-8. 4th edition.
33. de Leva P. Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters. J Biomech 1996, 29:1223-1230.
34. Sicard-Rosenbaum L., Light K.E., Behrman A.L. Gait, lower extremity strength, and self-assessed mobility after hip arthroplasty. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002, 57:M47-M51.
35. Shih C.H., Du Y.K., Lin Y.H., et al. Muscular recovery around the hip joint after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, 302:115-120.
36. Perron M., Malouin F., Moffet H., et al. Three-dimensional gait analysis in women with a total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 2000, 15:504-515.
37. Patla A.E., Prentice S., Gobbi T. Visual control of obstacle avoidance during locomotion: strategies in young children, young and older adults. Changes in sensory motor behavior in aging 1996, 257-277. Elsevier, Amsterdam. A.M. Ferrandez, N. Teasdale (Eds.).
38. Kovacs C.R. Age-related changes in gait and obstacle avoidance capabilities in older adults: a review. J Appl Gerontol 2005, 24(1):3-20.