Sport-decision aids and the "CSI-effect": Why cricket uses Hawk-Eye well and tennis uses it badly

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 904-921

  Collins, Harry ^a   Evans, Robert ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

innovation; interaction experts publics; media and science; popularisation of science; public understanding of science; representations of science; studies of science and technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868016523     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: 13616609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662511407991     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Atkinson P,Delamont SThe Process of Schooling. Hammersley MWoods P, ed. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1976:133-142.
2. Bijker WEOf Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995:.
3. Bijker WE.American and Dutch coastal engineering: Differences in risk conception and differences in technological culture.Social Studies of Science. 2007;37 (1): 143-151.
4. Bijker W.How is technology made? - That is the question!.Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2010;34:63-76.
5. Collins HMChanging Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. 1992) Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice, 2nd edn.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1992:.
6. Collins HM.The philosophy of umpiring and the introduction of decision-aid technology.Journal of the Philosophy of Sport. 2010;37 (2): 135-146.
7. Collins HM,Evans RJRethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2007:.
8. Collins HM,Evans RJ.You cannot be serious! Public understanding of technology with special reference to "Hawk-Eye.Public Understanding of Science. 2008;17 (3): 283-308.
9. Collins HM,Pinch TJThe Golem at Large: What You Should Know About Technology. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998:.
10. Driver R,Newton P,Osborne J.Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms.Science Education. 2000;84 (3): 287-312.
11. GowerD (2009) Third umpire strikes back as review system improves. The Sunday Times20December. Available at (accessed 7 April 2010): http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/columnists/david_gower/article6962837.ece.
12. Haddow G,Cunningham-Burley S,Bruce A,Parry S.Generation Scotland: Consulting publics and specialists at an early stage in a genetic database's development.Critical Public Health. 2008;18 (2): 139-149.
13. Hargreaves I,Lewis J,Speers TTowards a Better Map: Science, the Public and the Media. Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council; 2003:.
14. Science and Society: Science and Technology Select Committee, Third Report. London: HMSO; 2000:.
15. Irwin A.Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences.Public Understanding of Science. 2001;10 (1): 1-18.
16. Ley BL,Jankowski N,Brewer PR.Investigating CSI: Portrayals of DNA testing on a forensic crime show and their potential effects.Public Understanding of Science. 2010;:.
17. Marks LA,Kalaitzandonakes N,Wilkins L,Zakharova L.Mass media framing of biotechnology news.Public Understanding of Science. 2007;16 (2): 183-203.
18. Michael MTechnoscience and Everyday Life: The Complex Simplicities of the Mundane. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2006:.
19. Miller D,Kitzinger J,Williams K,Beharrell PThe Circuit of Mass Communication. London: SAGE; 2008:.
20. Mulkay M,Gilbert NOpening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984:.
21. Nelkin DSelling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. 1995) Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology, 2nd edn.New York: W.H. Freeman.New York: W.H. Freeman; 1995:.
22. Philo GMessage Received. Harlow: Longman; 1999:.
23. Pinch TJ,Bijker WThe Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Bijker WEHughes TPPinch TJ, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1987:17-50.
24. Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment. Rip AMisa TJSchot J, ed. London: Pinter Publishers; 1995:.
25. Russell JS.The concept of a call in baseball.Journal of the Philosophy of Sport. 1997;24 (1): 21-37.
26. Stewart CO,Dickerson DL,Hotchkiss R.Beliefs about science and news frames in audience evaluations of embryonic and adult stem cell research.Science Communication. 2009;30:427-452.
27. Wilsdon J,Willis RSee-through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. London: Demos; 2004:.