The relationship between vocal accuracy and variability to the level of compensation to altered auditory feedback

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 529, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 128-132

  Scheerer, Nichole E ^a   Jones, Jeffery A ^a,b  

^a WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Auditory feedback; Frequency altered feedback; Fundamental frequency; Sensorimotor control; Speech production; Vocal accuracy

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY FEEDBACK; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SINGING; SPEECH; VOCALIZATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; PITCH PERCEPTION; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); SINGING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867989081     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: 18727972     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.09.012     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bauer J.J., Mittal J., Larson C.R., Hain T.C. Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: an automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 119:2363-2371.
2. Boersma P. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 2001, 5:341-345.
3. 0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1998, 103:3153-3161.
4. 0 responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: a preliminary study. Journal of Voice 1997, 11:202-211.
5. Camacho A., Harris J.G. A sawtooth waveform inspired pitch estimator for speech and music. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2008, 124:1638-1652.
6. Civier O., Tasko S.M., Guenther F.H. Overreliance on auditory feedback may lead to sound/syllable repetitions: simulations of stuttering and fluency-inducing conditions with a neural model of speech production. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2010, 35:246-327.
7. Elliott L., Niemoeller A. The role of hearing in controlling voice fundamental frequency. International Audiology 1970, IX:47-52.
8. Elman J.L. Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1981, 70:45-50.
9. Guenther F.H. Cortical interactions underlying the production of speech sounds. Journal of Communication Disorders 2006, 39:350-365.
10. Hawco C.S., Jones J.A. Control of vocalization at utterance onset and mid-utterance: different mechanisms for different goals. Brain Research 2009, 1276:131-139.
11. Houde J.F., Jordan M.I. Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science 1998, 279:1213-1216.
12. Jones J.A., Keough D. Auditory-motor mapping for pitch control in singers and nonsingers. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 190:269-287.
13. 0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2000, 108:1246-1251.
14. Jones J.A., Munhall K.G. The role of auditory feedback during phonation: studies of Mandarin tone production. Journal of Phonetics 2002, 30:303-320.
15. Jones J.A., Munhall K.G. Remapping auditory-motor representations in voice production. Current Biology 2005, 15:1768-1772.
16. Keough D., Jones J.A. The sensitivity of auditory-motor representations to subtle changes in auditory feedback while singing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2009, 126:837-846.
17. 0 level on the pitch-shift reflex. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2007, 122:3671-3677.
18. Moore R.E., Keaton C., Watts C. The role of pitch memory in pitch discrimination and pitch matching. Journal of Voice 2007, 21:560-567.
19. Natke U., Donath T.M., Kalveram K.T. Control of voice fundamental frequency in speaking versus singing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2003, 113:1587-1593.
20. Proteau L., Marteniuk R.G., Girouard Y., Dugas C. On the type of information used to control and learn an aiming movement after moderate and extensive training. Human Movement Science 1987, 6:181-199.
21. Proteau L., Marteniuk R.G., Levesque L. A sensorimotor basis for motor learning: evidence indicating specificity of practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1992, 44A:557-575.
22. Purcell D.W., Munhall K.G. Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 119:2288-2297.
23. Schmidt R.A., Lee T.D. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis 2005, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL.
24. Watts C., Murphy J., Barnes-Burroughs K. Pitch-matching accuracy of trained singers, untrained subjects with talented singing voices, and untrained subjects with non-talented singing voices in conditions of varying feedback. Journal of Voice 2003, 17:187-196.
25. Yates A.J. Delayed auditory feedback. Psychological Bulletin 1963, 60:213-251.