Control of vocalization at utterance onset and mid-utterance: Different mechanisms for different goals

Brain Research

Volumn 1276, Issue , 2009, Pages 131-139

  Hawco, Colin S ^a   Jones, Jeffery A ^a  

^a WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Auditory feedback; Efference copy; F0; Forward model; Fundamental frequency; Sensorimotor; Speech production; Vocal pitch

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROL STRATEGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTOR CONTROL; NORMAL HUMAN; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARDIZATION; VOCALIZATION; VOICE; VOICE CHANGE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; GOALS; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; TIME FACTORS; VOICE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67349185117     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.04.033     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Boersma P. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot. Int. 5 (2001) 341-345
2. Burnett T.A., Freedland M.B., Larson C.R., and Hain T.C. Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103 (1998) 3153-3161
3. Curio G., Neuloh G., Numminen J., Jousmäki V., and Hari R. Speaking modifies voice-evoked activity in the human auditory cortex. Hum. Brain Mapp. 9 (2000) 183-191
4. Dizio P., and Lackner J.R. Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm. J. Neurophysiol. 74 (1995) 1787-1792
5. Donath T.M., Natke U., and Kalveram K.T. Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on voice F0 contours in syllables. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111 (2002) 357-366
6. Elman J.L. Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions. J Acoust. Soc. Am. 70 (1981) 45-50
7. Hain T.C., Burnett T.A., Kiran S., Larson C.R., Singh S., and Kenney M.K. Instructing subjects to make a voluntary response reveals the presence of two components to the audio-vocal reflex. Exp. Brain Res. 130 (2000) 133-141
8. Hawco, C. S., Jones, J. A., Ferretti, T. R., Keough, D., in press. ERP correlates of online monitoring of auditory feedback during vocalization. Psychophysiology.
9. Heinks-Maldonado T.H., Mathalon D.H., Gray M., and Ford J.M. Fine-tuning of auditory cortex during speech production. Psychophysiology 42 (2005) 180-190
10. Houde J.F., and Jordan M.I. Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science. 279 (1998) 1213-1216
11. Houde J.F., and Jordan M.I. Sensorimotor adaptation of speech I: Compensation and adaptation. J. Speech Lang. Hear Res. 45 (2002) 295-310
12. Houde J.F., Nagarajan S.S., Sekihara K., and Merzenich M.M. Modulation of the auditory cortex during speech: an MEG study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14 (2002) 1125-1138
13. Jones J.A., and Keough D. Auditory-motor mapping for pitch control in singers and nonsingers. Exp. Brain Res. 190 (2008) 279-287
14. Jones J.A., and Munhall K.G. Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation. J Acoust. Soc. Am. 108 (2000) 1246-1251
15. Jones J.A., and Munhall K.G. The role of auditory feedback during phonation: studies of Mandarin tone production. J. Phonetics 30 (2002) 303-320
16. Kalikow D.N., Stevens K.N., and Elliott L.L. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61 (1977) 1337-1351
17. Kudo N., Nakagome K., Kasai K., Araki T., Fukuda M., Kato N., and Iwanami A. Effects of corollary discharge on event-related potentials during selective attention task in healthy men and women. Neurosci. Res. 48 (2004) 59-64
18. Larson C.R. Cross-modality influences in speech motor control: the use of pitch shifting for the study of F0 control. J. Commun. Disord. 31 (1998) 489-502
19. Larson C.R., Burnett T.A., Bauer J.J., Kiran S., and Hain T.C. Comparison of voice F0 responses to pitch-shift onset and offset conditions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110 (2001) 2845-2848
20. Liu H., and Larson C.R. Effects of perturbation magnitude and voice F0 level on the pitch-shift reflex. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122 (2007) 3671-3677
21. Munhall K.G., MacDonald E.N., Byrne S.K., and Johnsrude I. Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not to compensate. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125 (2009) 384-390
22. Näätänen R., Paavilainen P., Rinne T., and Alho K. The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118 (2007) 2544-2590
23. Natke U., and Kalveram K.T. Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on fundamental frequency of long stressed and unstressed syllables. J. Speech Lang. Hear Res. 44 (2001) 577-584
24. Nowak D.A., Topka H., Timmann D., Boecker H., and Hermsdörfer J. The role of the cerebellum for predictive control of grasping. Cerebellum 6 (2007) 7-17
25. Perkell J., Matthies M., Lane H., Guenther F., Wilhelms-Tricarico R., Wozniak J., and Guiod P. Speech motor control: acoustic goals, saturation effects, auditory feedback and internal models. Speech Commun. Special Issue: Speech Production: Models Data 22 (1997) 227-250
26. Pick H.L., Siegel G.M., Fox P.W., Garber S.R., and Kearney J.K. Inhibiting the Lombard effect. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85 (1989) 894-900
27. Purcell D.W., and Munhall K.G. Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119 (2006) 2288-2297
28. Scheidt R.A., and Ghez C. Separate adaptive mechanisms for controlling trajectory and final position in reaching. J. Neurophysiol. 98 (2007) 3600-3613
29. Thoroughman K.A., Fine M.S., and Taylor J.A. Trial-by-trial motor adaptation: a window into elemental neural computation. Prog. Brain Res. 165 (2007) 373-382
30. Wolpert D.M., and Kawato M. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw. 11 (1998) 1317-1329