Divorced and married couples' object relations: A pilot-study with the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale (SCORS);Le relazioni oggettuali di coppie separate e coniugate: Uno studio-pilota con la Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale (SCORS)

Giornale Italiano di Psicologia

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 369-384

  Abbate, Luigi ^a   Laghi, Fiorenzo ^a   Pace, Cecilia Serena ^a   Di Luca, Ilaria ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Conflicting separation; Marital relationship; Multidimensional assessment of TAT stories; Social cognition and object relations (Drew Westen's SCORS)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867939458     PISSN: 03905349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. ABBATE L., MASSARO V. (2007). La valutazione delle relazioni oggettuali e delle rappresentazioni sociali con il TAT. La Social Cognition and Object Relation Scale di Drew Westen. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
2. ACKERMAN S. J., HLLSENROTH M. J., CLEMENCE A. J., WEATHERILL R, FOWLER J. C. (2001). Convergent validity of Rorschach and TAT scales of object relations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77(2), 295-306. (Pubitemid 32977699)
3. BEEBE B., LACHMANN F. M. (2002). Infant research and adult treatment co-constructing interactions. New York: Analytic Press (trad. it. Infant research e trattamento degli adulti. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 2003).
4. BELLAK L., ABRAMS D. (1997). The TAT, CAT and SAT in clinical use (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
5. BONCORI L. (1993). Teorie e tecniche dei test. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
6. BOHANNAN P. (1970). The six stations of divorce. In M. E. Lasswell, T. E. Lasswell (eds.), Love, marriage and family: A developmental approach. Chicago, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
7. BOOTH A., AMATO P. R. (2001). Parental predivorce relations and offspring postdivorce well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 197-212.
8. CAVANNA D. (2009). Crisi e sofferenza nella separazione. In L. Carli, D. Cavanna, G. C. Zavattini (a cura di), Psicologia delle relazioni di coppia. Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 119-152.
9. CLULOW C. (2001). Adult attachment and couple psychotherapy. London: Brunner-Routledge (trad. it. Attaccamento adulto e psicoterapia di coppia. Roma: Borla, 2003).
10. CONKLIN A., WESTEN D. (2001). Thematic Apperception Test. In W. I. Orfman, M. Hersen (eds.), Understanding psycological assessment. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
11. CRAMER P. (1999). Future directions for the Thematic Apperception Test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 72(1), 74-92. (Pubitemid 29169245)
12. CUPACH W. R., SPITZBERG B. H. (2007). The dark side of interpersonal communication (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
13. DICKS H. V. (1967). Marital tension. London: Routledge & Kegan (trad. it. Tensioni Coniugali. Roma: Borla, 2005).
14. EIGUER A., CAREL A., FUSTIER F. A., AUBERTEL F. (2005). Le générationnel: approche en thérapie familiale psychoanalytique. Paris: Dunod.
15. FONAGY P. (2005). Psychoanalytic development theory. In E. S. Person, A. M Cooper, G. O. Gabbard (eds.), The American psychiatric publishing textbook of psychoanalysis. New York: American Psychiatric Publishing, pp. 117-130
16. (trad. it. La teoria evolutiva psicoanalitica. In E. S. PERSON, A. M. COOPER, G. O. GABBARD [a cura di], Psicoanalisi. Teoria-clinica-ricerca. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 2006, pp. 213-236).
17. GREENBERG J. R., MITCHELL S. A. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (trad. it. Le relazioni oggettuali nella teoria psicoanalitica. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1986).
18. GRIER F. (2005). Oedipus and the couple. London: Karnac Press (trad. it. Edipo e la coppia. Roma: Borla, 2007).
19. GRYCH J. H., FLNCHAM F. D. (2001). Interparental conflict and child development: Theory, research and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. GROSSMANN K. E., GROSSMANN K., WATERS E. (eds.) (2005). Attachment from infancy to adulthood. The major longitudinal studies. New York: Guilford Press.
21. HETHERINGTON E. M. (1989). Coping with family transition: Winner, losers and survivors. Child Development, 60, 1-14.
22. HIBBARD S., HILSENROTH M. J., HIBBARD J. K., NASH M. R. (1995). A validity study of two projective object representations measures. Psychological Assessment, 7, 4, 432-439. (Pubitemid 26017341)
23. HOLLINGSHEAD M. (1975). Four factor index of social status. New Haven, CT: Working Paper.
24. HUPRICH S. K., GREENBERG R. P. (2003). Advances in the assessment of the object relations in the 1990s. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 665-698. (Pubitemid 37100983)
25. KELLY J. B. (2000). Children's adjustment in conflicted marriage and divorce: A decade of review research. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 963-973. (Pubitemid 30639783)
26. KELLY J. B. (2006). Children's living arrangements following separation and divorce: Insight from empirical and clinical research. Family Process, 46, 35-52.
27. IsTAT (2008). Evoluzione e nuove tendenze dell'instabilità coniugale. Argomenti, 34.
28. LILIENFELD S. O., WOOD J. M., GARB H. N. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1(2), 27-66.
29. LIS A., STELLA S., ZAVATTINI G. C. (1999). Manuale di psicologia dinamica. Bologna: Il Mulino.
30. LIJBRANO LAVADERA A., MALAGOLI TOGLIATTI M. (2011). Bambini in Tribunale. L'ascolto dei figli "contesi". Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
31. MASINA E., MONTINARI G. (1995). Il conflitto familiare. In M. Malagoli Togliatti e G. Montinari (a cura di), Famiglie divise. Milano: Franco Angeli, pp. 68-79.
32. MATTLAR C. E. (2003). The Rorschach Comprehensive System is reliable, valid, and cost-effective. Unpublisched Manuscript, Kista, Sweden.
33. MITCHELL A. S. (2000). Relationality: From attachment to intersubjctivity. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum (trad. it. Il modello relazionale. Dall'attaccamento all'intersoggettività. Milano: Raffello Cortina, 2002).
34. MITCHELL A. S. (2002). Can love last? Fate of romance over time. New York: Norton (trad. it. L'amore può durare? Il destino dell'amore romantico. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 2003).
35. NORSA D., ZAVATTINI G. C. (1997). Intimità e collusione. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
36. PETERS E. J., HILSENROTH M. J., EUDELL-SIMMONDS E. M., BLAGYS M. D., HANDLER L. (2006). Reliability and validity of the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale in clinical use. Psychotherapy Research, 16(5), 617-626. (Pubitemid 44530276)
37. PORCERELLI J., HUPRICH S. K., KARANA D., BINIENDA J. (2006). Object representations and their relationship to psychopathology and physical health status in African-American women in primary care. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 194, 838-844. (Pubitemid 44747906)
38. RUSZCZYNSKI S. (2003). State of mind in perversion and violence. Journal of the British Association of Psychotherapists, 41, 87-100.
39. SAMEROFF A. J., MCDONOUGH S. C., ROSENBLUM K. L. (2004). Treating Parent-Infant Relationship Problems. New York: Guilford Press (trad. it. Il trattamento clinico della relazione genitore-bambino. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2006).
40. SANTONA A., ZAVATTINI G. C. (2009). Intimità, vicinanza e disregolazione. In L. Carli, D. Cavanna, G. C. Zavattini (a cura di), Psicologia delle relazioni di coppia. Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 153-191.
41. SBARRA D. A., EMERY R. E. (2005). Co-parenting conflict, non-acceptance, and depression among divorced adults: Results from 12-year-follow-up study of child custody mediation using multiple imputation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75, 63-75. (Pubitemid 40261730)
42. SBARRA D. A., EMERY R. E. (2008). Deeper into divorce: Using actor-partner analyses to explore systemic differences in co-parenting conflict following custody dispute resolution. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 144-152.
43. STERN D. N. (2005). Intersubjectivity. In E. S. Person, A. M Cooper, G. O. Gabbard (eds.), The American psychiatric publishing textbook of psychoanalysis. New York: American Psychiatric Publishing, pp. 77-92.
44. TRONICK E. Z. (2005). Why is connection with other so critical? The formation of dyadic state of consciousness and the expansion of individual's state of consciousness. Coherence governed selection and co-creation of meaning out of messy meaning. In J. Nadel, D. Muir (eds.), Emotional development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 293-316.
45. VITO A. (2009). La perizia nelle separazioni. Milano: Franco Angeli.
46. WESTEN D. (1985). Self and society: Narcissism, collectivism, and the development of moral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. WESTEN D. (1991a). Clinical assessment of object relations using the TAT. Journal of Personality Assessment, 56(1), 56-74.
48. WESTEN D. (1991b). Social cognition and object relations. Psychological Bulletin, 109(3), 429-455.
49. WESTEN D., LOHR N., SILK K. R., GOLD L., KERBER K. (1990). Object relations and social cognition in borderline, major depressives, and normal: A Thematic Apperception Test analysis. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2(4), 335-364.
50. WESTEN D., LOHR N., SILK K. R., KERBER K. (1985). Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale (SCORS): Manual for coding TAT Data. Unpublished manuscript. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.