The individual in interaction: Why cognitive and discourse-level pragmatics need not conflict

Intercultural Pragmatics

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 517-542

  Wedgwood, Daniel ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80455178760     PISSN: 1612295X     EISSN: 1613365X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/IPRG.2011.024     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Arundale, Robert B. 1999. An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory. Pragmatics 9. 119-154.
2. Arundale, Robert B. 2008. Against (Gricean) intentions at the heart of human interaction. Intercul-tural Pragmatics 5(2). 229-258.
3. Attardo, Salvatore. 1998. Are socio-pragmatics and (Neo)-Gricean pragmatics incompatible? Journal of Pragmatics 30(5). 627-636.
4. Barr, Dale J. & Boaz Keysar. 2005. Making sense of how we make sense: The paradox of egocen-trism in language use. In H. L. Colston & A. N. Katz (eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural infuences, 21-41. Mahwaw, N.J.: Erlbaum.
5. Cappelen, Herman & Ernie Lepore. 2005. Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell.
6. Cappelen, Herman & Ernie Lepore. 2007. Relevance theory and shared content. In Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), Pragmatics, 115-135. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
7. Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Carston, Robyn. 2004. Explicature and semantics. In Steven Davis & Brendan S. Gillon (eds.),Semantics: A Reader, 817-845. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Clark, Herbert H. 1997. Dogmas of understanding. Discourse Processes 23. 567-598.
11. Cram, David & Paul Hedley. 2005. Pronouns and procedural meaning: The relevance of spaghetticode and paranoid delusion. Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics 10. 187-210.
12. Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. 2001. Intentions as emergent products of social interactions. In Bertram F.Malle, Louis J. Moses, & Dare A. Baldwin (eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition, 105-122. Cambridge, MA.: M.I.T. Press.
13. Gil, José María. 2011. Relevance theory and unintended transmission of information. Intercultural Pragmatics 8(1). 1-40.
14. Grice, H. P. 1957. Meaning. Philosophical Review 66. 377-388.
15. Reprinted in Steinberg, D. and Jakobovits. L., 1971, Semantics: an interdisciplinary reader, 53-59. Cambridge University Press
16. and in Grice (1989): 213-223.
17. Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Speech Acts(Syntax and Semantics 3), 41-58. New York: Academic Press.
18. Reprinted in Grice (1989):22-40.
19. Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Haugh, Michael. 2008. The place of intention in the interactional achievement of implicature. In Istvan Kecskes & Jacob Mey (eds.), Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, 45-85. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
21. Haugh, Michael. 2009. Intention(ality) and the conceptualization of communication in pragmatics.Australian Journal of Linguistics 29(1). 91-113.
22. Hauser, Marc. 1996. The Evolution of Communication. Cambridge, MA.: M.I.T. Press.
23. Horn, Laurence. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
24. Jary, Mark. 1998. Is relevance theory asocial? Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 157(11).157-169.
25. Kecskes, I. 2010. The paradox of communication: Socio-cognitive approach to pragmatics. Pragmatics and Society 1(1). 50-73.
26. Kecskes, I. & F. Zhang. 2009. Activating, seeking and creating common ground: A socio-cognitive approach. Pragmatics and Cognition 17(2). 331-355.
27. Kjøll, Georg. 2010. Content similarity and communicative success. International Review of Pragmatics 2(1). 21-45.
28. Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
30. Levinson, Stephen C. 2006. Cognition at the heart of human interaction. Discourse Studies 8. 85-93.
31. Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, second edition.
32. Mey, Jacob L. & Mary Talbot. 1988. Computation and the soul. Journal of Pragmatics 12(5/6).743-789.
33. Nuyts, Jan. 2000. Intentionality. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman & J. Blommaert (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics: Quintessence, 1-17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
34. Nuyts, Jan. 2003. Refections on the intentionality of linguistic behavior. In G. Preyer, G. Peter, & M. Ulkan (eds.), Concepts of meaning, 39-59. Dordrecht: Kluwer
35. Sanders, Robert E. 1987. Cognitive Foundations of Calculated Speech. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
36. Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Toward an empirical base in pragmatics (review article). Language in Society 16. 381-396.
37. Scott-Phillips, Thomas C. 2009. The social evolution of pragmatic behaviour. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.
38. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1986(1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
39. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1997. Remarks on relevance theory and the social sciences. Mul-tilingua 16. 145-151.
40. Wardlow Lane, Liane & Victor Ferreira. 2008. Speaker-external versus speaker-internal forces on utterance form: Do cognitive demands override threats to referential success? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 34. 1466-1481.
41. Wedgwood, Daniel. 2007. Identifying inferences in focus. In Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Win-kler (eds.), On Information Structure, Meaning and Form, Amsterdam/?Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
42. Wedgwood, Daniel. 2011. Dissimilarities in perspective: A reply to Kjøll. International Review of Pragmatics 3(2). 292-303.
43. NN" and "showing": Relevance-theoretic and Gricean intentions. Intercultural Pragmatics 5(2). 131-152.
44. Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45. Žegarac, Vlad & Billy Clark. 1999a. Phatic communication and relevance theory: A reply to Ward & Horn. Journal of Linguistics 35(3). 565-577.
46. egarac, Vlad & Billy Clark. 1999b. Phatic interpretations and phatic communication. Journal of Linguistics 35(2). 321-346.